Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Locust and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PFLB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (60.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Locust
Star Rating
(10)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (60.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about LocustOpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(40)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance EngineeringSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional excels in its Test Variety, scoring 9.3, which allows for a wide range of testing scenarios, while Locust, although effective, does not match this level of versatility.
- Reviewers mention that the Ease of Use for Locust is notably higher at 9.3 compared to LoadRunner's 8.3, making it a more user-friendly option for teams looking to quickly adopt performance testing.
- G2 users highlight that LoadRunner's Reporting capabilities are robust, with a score of 9.0, providing detailed insights that are crucial for performance analysis, whereas Locust's reporting features are considered less comprehensive.
- Users on G2 indicate that LoadRunner Professional has a lower Ease of Setup score at 6.7, suggesting that it may require more time and resources to implement compared to Locust, which is often praised for its straightforward setup process.
- Reviewers mention that the Quality of Support for Locust is rated higher at 9.0, indicating a more responsive and helpful support team, while LoadRunner's support is seen as adequate but not as strong.
- Users say that LoadRunner's ability to handle Extreme Cases is rated at 7.4, which some find limiting, while Locust is often favored for its flexibility in handling various load scenarios, making it a preferred choice for dynamic testing environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Locust
No pricing availableOpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No pricing availableFree Trial
Locust
No trial information availableOpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
Not enough data
9.1
23
Ease of Use
9.3
5
8.3
24
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
6.7
9
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.4
9
Quality of Support
9.0
5
7.6
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.8
9
Product Direction (% positive)
Not enough data
8.5
23
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Reporting
Not enough data
9.0
7
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Locust and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering are categorized as Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories
Locust has no unique categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering is categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Locust
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
50.0%
Retail
20.0%
Financial Services
20.0%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
‐
Other
0.0%
Information Technology and Services
47.1%
Computer Software
14.7%
Hospital & Health Care
5.9%
Staffing and Recruiting
2.9%
Sporting Goods
2.9%
Other
26.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Locust has no discussions with answers
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
