Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Locust and OpenText Core Performance Engineering

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Locust
Locust
Star Rating
(10)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (60.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Locust
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(13)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Core Performance Engineering
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Cloud excels in stress testing with a score of 9.3, highlighting its ability to simulate a large number of users effectively, while Locust, although strong, has a slightly lower focus on extreme cases with a score of 9.4, which some users feel limits its scalability in high-demand scenarios.
  • Reviewers mention that the reporting capabilities of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud are robust, scoring 9.3, with features like detailed performance metrics and customizable dashboards, whereas Locust, while offering good reporting, does not match the depth and user-friendliness of LoadRunner's reporting tools.
  • G2 users indicate that OpenText LoadRunner Cloud has a higher ease of setup score of 9.1, with many reviewers appreciating its guided setup process, while Locust users report a steeper learning curve, which can be challenging for new users.
  • Users on G2 highlight that OpenText LoadRunner Cloud's quality of support is rated at 8.8, with many praising the responsiveness and expertise of the support team, compared to Locust's 9.0, where users mention that while support is good, it can sometimes be slower due to the community-driven nature of the product.
  • Reviewers say that OpenText LoadRunner Cloud has a strong product direction with a perfect score of 10.0, indicating confidence in its future development, while Locust, although well-regarded, does not have the same level of assurance in its ongoing enhancements.
  • Users report that both products have high ease of use ratings, with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud at 9.2 and Locust at 9.3, but many users of LoadRunner mention that its intuitive interface makes it easier for teams to adopt quickly compared to Locust's more technical setup.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Locust
No pricing available
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
No pricing available
Free Trial
Locust
No trial information available
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
Not enough data
9.5
11
Ease of Use
9.3
5
9.2
11
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.2
8
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.0
8
Quality of Support
9.0
5
8.8
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.6
8
Product Direction (% positive)
Not enough data
10.0
10
Features by Category
Not enough data
9.4
10
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
10
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Reporting
Not enough data
9.3
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Locust
Locust
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
Locust and OpenText Core Performance Engineering are categorized as Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories
Locust
Locust has no unique categories
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Locust
Locust
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
30.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
60.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
10.0%
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
23.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
53.8%
Reviewers' Industry
Locust
Locust
Computer Software
50.0%
Retail
20.0%
Financial Services
20.0%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Other
0.0%
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
Information Technology and Services
30.8%
Computer Software
30.8%
Financial Services
23.1%
Insurance
7.7%
Government Administration
7.7%
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Locust
Locust Alternatives
k6
k6
Add k6
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Add Apache JMeter
SOAPUI
SOAPUI
Add SOAPUI
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Add Apache JMeter
k6
k6
Add k6
LoadView
LoadView
Add LoadView
Discussions
Locust
Locust Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Locust has no discussions with answers
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Core Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers