Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare LoadNinja and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PFLB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (57.1% of reviews)
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
LoadNinja
Star Rating
(14)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (57.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about LoadNinjaOpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(40)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance EngineeringSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText LoadRunner Professional excels in its Test Variety with a score of 9.3, allowing users to conduct a wide range of performance tests, while LoadNinja, with a score of 8.5, offers fewer options for test types.
- Users report that LoadNinja shines in Ease of Use with a score of 9.3, making it more accessible for small businesses, whereas OpenText LoadRunner Professional has a lower score of 8.3, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight the Reporting capabilities of OpenText LoadRunner Professional, which received a score of 9.0, as being particularly robust, while LoadNinja's reporting features, scoring 8.3, are seen as less comprehensive.
- Users on G2 mention that OpenText LoadRunner Professional's Stress Testing capabilities, with a score of 8.3, are effective for enterprise-level applications, while LoadNinja outperforms it slightly with a score of 8.9, particularly in cloud-based environments.
- Reviewers say that the Quality of Support for LoadNinja, scoring 8.1, is generally perceived as better than OpenText LoadRunner Professional's score of 7.6, indicating a more responsive support team for LoadNinja users.
- Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional has a more established presence in the Enterprise Market, with 76.5% of reviews coming from enterprise users, while LoadNinja is favored by small businesses, with 57.1% of reviews, suggesting a difference in target audience and use cases.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
LoadNinja
No pricing availableOpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No pricing availableFree Trial
LoadNinja
Free Trial is available
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
10
9.1
23
Ease of Use
9.3
10
8.3
24
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
6.7
9
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.4
9
Quality of Support
8.1
9
7.6
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.8
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
10
8.5
23
Features by Category
Functionality
8.9
9
8.3
7
8.1
9
7.4
7
8.5
9
9.3
7
Reporting
8.3
9
9.0
7
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
LoadNinja and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering are categorized as Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories
LoadNinja has no unique categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering is categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
LoadNinja
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
42.9%
Information Technology and Services
21.4%
Hospital & Health Care
14.3%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
7.1%
Retail
7.1%
Other
7.1%
Information Technology and Services
47.1%
Computer Software
14.7%
Hospital & Health Care
5.9%
Staffing and Recruiting
2.9%
Sporting Goods
2.9%
Other
26.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
LoadNinja has no discussions with answers
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
