Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare LiteSpeed Web Server and Squid 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
NLX
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (86.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
LiteSpeed Web Server
Star Rating
(55)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (86.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about LiteSpeed Web ServerSquid
Star Rating
(16)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SquidSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that LiteSpeed Web Server excels in content delivery acceleration, with features like "HTTP/3 support" and "QUIC protocol" that significantly enhance loading times, while Squid is noted for its robust caching capabilities but lacks the same level of speed optimization.
- Reviewers mention that LiteSpeed's ease of setup is a standout feature, scoring 9.0, which is significantly higher than Squid's 6.0. Users appreciate the intuitive interface and quick configuration options, making it ideal for small businesses.
- G2 users highlight LiteSpeed's superior quality of support, with a score of 9.4, compared to Squid's 7.3. Many reviewers praise the responsive customer service and extensive documentation provided by LiteSpeed, which helps users troubleshoot issues effectively.
- Users on G2 indicate that LiteSpeed's security features, particularly its "SSL/TLS processing" and "security updates," are highly rated at 9.4, while Squid's security measures, although adequate, do not offer the same level of real-time visibility and centralized control.
- Reviewers say that LiteSpeed's performance in server management, scoring 9.4, is enhanced by its "real-time monitoring" tools, which allow users to track server health and performance metrics, whereas Squid's management features are more basic and less user-friendly.
- Users report that LiteSpeed's modular architecture and support for modern web frameworks, scoring 9.2, make it a preferred choice for developers looking to implement microservices, while Squid's architecture is less flexible and may not meet the needs of modern application development.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
LiteSpeed Web Server
No pricing availableSquid
No pricing availableFree Trial
LiteSpeed Web Server
Free Trial is available
Squid
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.5
44
8.6
12
Ease of Use
9.2
44
7.9
12
Ease of Setup
9.0
38
6.0
7
Ease of Admin
8.8
37
7.9
7
Quality of Support
9.4
43
7.3
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.5
37
7.8
6
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
42
10.0
12
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.4
12
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
User Features
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
Modernization
8.7
9
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
AI Performance Improvement - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
LiteSpeed Web Server and Squid are categorized as Application Server
Unique Categories
LiteSpeed Web Server has no unique categories
Squid is categorized as Web Server Accelerator and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
LiteSpeed Web Server
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Squid
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
25.5%
Marketing and Advertising
7.8%
Internet
7.8%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
7.8%
Computer & Network Security
7.8%
Other
43.1%
Computer Software
18.8%
Education Management
12.5%
Telecommunications
6.3%
Retail
6.3%
Real Estate
6.3%
Other
50.0%
Discussions
LiteSpeed Web Server has no discussions with answers
Squid has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
