Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare LiteSpeed Web Server and Phusion Passenger

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
LiteSpeed Web Server
LiteSpeed Web Server
Star Rating
(55)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (86.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about LiteSpeed Web Server
Phusion Passenger
Phusion Passenger
Star Rating
(12)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (75.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Phusion Passenger
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Phusion Passenger excels in server management with a score of 9.4, making it a reliable choice for those who prioritize efficient server operations. In contrast, LiteSpeed Web Server, while still strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.8 in ease of admin, indicating that users may find it a bit more challenging to manage.
  • Reviewers mention that LiteSpeed Web Server shines in quality of support, achieving a score of 9.4, which is significantly higher than Phusion Passenger's score of 8.3. This suggests that users may receive more effective assistance and resources when encountering issues with LiteSpeed.
  • G2 users highlight that Phusion Passenger offers robust web-based framework support with a score of 9.2, which is crucial for developers working with various frameworks. LiteSpeed Web Server, while still competent, does not match this level of support, indicating a potential limitation for users focused on framework compatibility.
  • Users on G2 report that LiteSpeed Web Server has a higher product direction score of 9.7 compared to Phusion Passenger's 7.7, suggesting that users feel more confident in LiteSpeed's future development and feature enhancements.
  • Reviewers say that Phusion Passenger's data redundancy score of 8.3 is adequate, but LiteSpeed Web Server's overall performance in data management is perceived as superior, particularly in areas like data exchange, which scored 8.5 for both but with LiteSpeed showing more consistent user satisfaction.
  • Users report that while both products have similar star ratings of 4.7, the total number of reviews for LiteSpeed Web Server (51) compared to Phusion Passenger (12) indicates a broader user base, which may provide more insights and community support for potential buyers.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
LiteSpeed Web Server
No pricing available
Phusion Passenger
No pricing available
Free Trial
LiteSpeed Web Server
Free Trial is available
Phusion Passenger
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.5
44
9.3
5
Ease of Use
9.2
44
9.2
6
Ease of Setup
9.0
38
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.8
37
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.4
43
8.3
6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.5
37
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
42
7.7
5
Features by Category
8.6
12
Not enough data
Data Management
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.4
12
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
User Features
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
Modernization
8.7
9
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
AI Performance Improvement - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
LiteSpeed Web Server
LiteSpeed Web Server
Phusion Passenger
Phusion Passenger
LiteSpeed Web Server and Phusion Passenger are categorized as Application Server
Unique Categories
LiteSpeed Web Server
LiteSpeed Web Server has no unique categories
Phusion Passenger
Phusion Passenger has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
LiteSpeed Web Server
LiteSpeed Web Server
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
86.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
7.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
5.9%
Phusion Passenger
Phusion Passenger
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
75.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
25.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
0%
Reviewers' Industry
LiteSpeed Web Server
LiteSpeed Web Server
Information Technology and Services
25.5%
Marketing and Advertising
7.8%
Internet
7.8%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
7.8%
Computer & Network Security
7.8%
Other
43.1%
Phusion Passenger
Phusion Passenger
Computer Software
58.3%
Real Estate
8.3%
Information Technology and Services
8.3%
Government Administration
8.3%
Computer & Network Security
8.3%
Other
8.3%
Alternatives
LiteSpeed Web Server
LiteSpeed Web Server Alternatives
F5 NGINX
Nginx
Add F5 NGINX
RunCloud.io
RunCloud.io
Add RunCloud.io
Lighttpd
Lighttpd
Add Lighttpd
Plesk
Plesk
Add Plesk
Phusion Passenger
Phusion Passenger Alternatives
Plesk
Plesk
Add Plesk
Apache HTTP Server Project
Apache HTTP Server Project
Add Apache HTTP Server Project
IBM WebSphere
IBM WebSphere
Add IBM WebSphere
Apache Tomcat
Tomcat
Add Apache Tomcat
Discussions
LiteSpeed Web Server
LiteSpeed Web Server Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
LiteSpeed Web Server has no discussions with answers
Phusion Passenger
Phusion Passenger Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Phusion Passenger has no discussions with answers