Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Lighthouse Issue Tracking and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
DocSheets
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$100 per month
No pricing available
Lighthouse Issue Tracking
Star Rating
(10)3.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$100 per month
Browse all 3 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results. In contrast, Lighthouse Issue Tracking does not provide a dedicated test repository feature, which may limit its effectiveness for teams focused on extensive testing.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center offers superior integration capabilities with a score of 8.1, enabling seamless connections with various development tools. Lighthouse Issue Tracking, while user-friendly, lacks the same level of integration options, which can hinder workflow efficiency for teams using multiple software solutions.
- G2 users highlight the robust Bug Reporting features of OpenText ALM Quality Center, particularly in Tester Reports & Feedback, which scored 9.1. This allows teams to gather detailed insights on bugs, whereas Lighthouse Issue Tracking, with a lower score in this area, may not provide the same depth of feedback for testers.
- Users on G2 appreciate the Management Reporting capabilities of OpenText ALM Quality Center, which scored 8.9, allowing for detailed analytics and insights into project progress. Lighthouse Issue Tracking, while functional, does not match this level of reporting sophistication, potentially leaving teams with less visibility into their projects.
- Reviewers say that OpenText ALM Quality Center shines in its organization and thoroughness, scoring 9.7 and 9.0 respectively, which helps teams maintain a clear structure in their testing processes. In comparison, Lighthouse Issue Tracking may not offer the same level of organizational features, which could lead to challenges in managing complex projects.
- Users report that the quality of support for OpenText ALM Quality Center is rated at 7.7, indicating a generally positive experience, while Lighthouse Issue Tracking's support is rated lower at 6.7. This difference suggests that teams using OpenText may have better access to assistance when issues arise, which is crucial for maintaining productivity.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Lighthouse Issue Tracking
GOLD
$100
per month
- Unlimited projects
- Unlimited members
- 50GB of file storage
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Lighthouse Issue Tracking
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
7.2
10
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.2
10
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.2
59
Quality of Support
6.7
8
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
1.8
10
6.8
116
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Lighthouse Issue Tracking and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
Lighthouse Issue Tracking has no unique categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Lighthouse Issue Tracking
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Internet
20.0%
Computer Software
20.0%
Telecommunications
10.0%
Medical Practice
10.0%
Marketing and Advertising
10.0%
Other
30.0%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Discussions
Lighthouse Issue Tracking has no discussions with answers
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
