Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Leapwork and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Leapwork
Star Rating
(102)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about LeapworkOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for efficient management and organization of test cases. In contrast, Leapwork, while strong in other areas, does not have a specific score for this feature, indicating a potential gap in comprehensive test case management.
- Reviewers mention that Leapwork shines in Ease of Use with a score of 9.0, making it more accessible for teams new to automation. OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 7.8, may present a steeper learning curve for users, particularly those unfamiliar with its extensive features.
- G2 users highlight Leapwork's superior Quality of Support, rated at 8.8, which is significantly higher than OpenText ALM Quality Center's score of 7.7. This suggests that Leapwork may provide more responsive and helpful customer service, a critical factor for teams needing timely assistance.
- Users on G2 report that OpenText ALM Quality Center has robust Reporting capabilities, scoring 8.9, which is essential for tracking project progress and outcomes. Leapwork, while effective, does not have a specific score for this feature, indicating that it may not offer the same depth in reporting functionalities.
- Reviewers mention that Leapwork's Automation features are user-friendly and intuitive, contributing to its high Ease of Setup score of 8.3. In comparison, OpenText ALM Quality Center's score of 7.2 suggests that users may face challenges during the initial setup phase.
- Users say that OpenText ALM Quality Center provides strong Traceability features, which are crucial for ensuring that all requirements are met throughout the testing process. Leapwork, while effective in many areas, does not emphasize this feature as strongly, which could impact teams focused on compliance and thorough documentation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Leapwork
No pricing availableOpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Leapwork
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
84
8.2
118
Ease of Use
9.0
86
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
8.5
71
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
8.4
48
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.9
83
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
47
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
82
6.8
116
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Feature Not Available
8.3
5
8.6
60
8.7
5
8.0
59
7.7
5
8.5
58
9.0
5
Automation
7.7
57
9.7
5
8.3
59
8.7
5
8.4
59
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.4
8
Not enough data
5.6
8
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Leapwork and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Automation Testing
Unique Categories
Leapwork is categorized as AI Software Testing Tools
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, Software Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Leapwork
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
12.6%
Computer Software
9.5%
Financial Services
7.4%
Insurance
5.3%
Automotive
5.3%
Other
60.0%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Does Leapwork use selenium?
2 Comments
AB
YesRead more
What is Leapwork?
1 Comment
Official Response from Leapwork
Thanks for asking. Leapwork uses AI powered visual automation that’s faster and easier so your teams can innovate and your business can continue to grow.Read more
How expensive is Leapwork?
1 Comment
Official Response from Leapwork
Leapwork is made to serve businesses of all sizes and teams of all kinds.To understand how to best scale test-automation in your organization, request a...Read more
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
