Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Leapwork and mabl

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Leapwork
Leapwork
Star Rating
(103)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.9% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Leapwork
mabl
mabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mabl
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Leapwork excels in its ease of setup, with a score of 8.3, while mabl outperforms in ease of administration, scoring 9.0. Reviewers mention that Leapwork's setup process is straightforward but can be time-consuming for complex projects.
  • Reviewers mention that mabl shines in test feedback, scoring 9.1 compared to Leapwork's 8.0. Users on G2 appreciate mabl's detailed insights and actionable feedback, which help in quickly identifying issues during testing.
  • G2 users highlight that mabl offers superior test history management with a score of 9.2, while Leapwork scores 8.7. Users say that mabl's ability to track and analyze past test runs is a significant advantage for maintaining test quality over time.
  • Users report that Leapwork has a lower customization score of 7.9 compared to mabl's 8.8. Reviewers mention that mabl provides more flexible options for tailoring tests to specific needs, which is crucial for teams with unique testing requirements.
  • Reviewers mention that mabl is recognized for its reliability, scoring 9.0, while Leapwork scores 8.3. Users on G2 say that mabl's consistent performance in various testing environments makes it a preferred choice for critical applications.
  • Users report that Leapwork and mabl both have high ratings for quality of support, with Leapwork at 8.8 and mabl at 9.2. However, reviewers mention that mabl's support team is particularly responsive and helpful, which enhances the overall user experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Leapwork
No pricing available
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Learn more about mabl
Free Trial
Leapwork
Free Trial is available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
85
8.6
28
Ease of Use
9.0
87
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
8.4
72
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
8.4
49
9.0
5
Quality of Support
8.9
84
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
48
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
83
8.7
26
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.4
63
9.0
18
Functionality
Feature Not Available
9.1
17
8.6
60
9.2
17
8.0
59
8.8
17
8.5
58
8.5
17
Automation
7.7
57
8.3
16
8.3
60
9.0
17
8.4
60
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.4
8
Not enough data
5.6
8
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Software Testing ToolsHide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Leapwork
Leapwork
mabl
mabl
Leapwork and mabl are categorized as Automation Testing and AI Software Testing Tools
Unique Categories
Leapwork
Leapwork has no unique categories
mabl
mabl is categorized as Software Testing and Load Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Leapwork
Leapwork
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
16.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
35.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
47.9%
mabl
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
36.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
44.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
19.4%
Reviewers' Industry
Leapwork
Leapwork
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Computer Software
9.4%
Financial Services
7.3%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.2%
Insurance
5.2%
Other
60.4%
mabl
mabl
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
Leapwork
Leapwork Alternatives
Tricentis Tosca
Tricentis Tosca
Add Tricentis Tosca
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
UiPath Agentic Automation
UiPath Agentic Automation
Add UiPath Agentic Automation
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
mabl
mabl Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Tricentis Testim
Tricentis Testim
Add Tricentis Testim
Cypress
Cypress
Add Cypress
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
Discussions
Leapwork
Leapwork Discussions
Does Leapwork use selenium?
2 Comments
What is Leapwork?
1 Comment
Official Response from Leapwork
Thanks for asking. Leapwork uses AI powered visual automation that’s faster and easier so your teams can innovate and your business can continue to grow.Read more
What is Leapwork tool?
1 Comment
Official Response from Leapwork
Good question. Leapwork was founded as a response to the challenge many organizations face when trying to scale testing, and the possible negative outcomes...Read more
mabl
mabl Discussions
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
Cindy S.
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
Greg G.
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs. It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
Greg G.
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more