# Leapwork vs mabl Comparison
---
## AI Generated Summary
- **G2 reviewers report** that Leapwork excels in user satisfaction, with many praising its **ease of use** and quick ramp-up time. Users highlight how straightforward it is to automate tests, with one reviewer noting that the initial setup was very easy and writing test cases felt simple.
- **According to verified reviews** , mabl stands out for its **great UX design** , which makes onboarding smooth. Users appreciate the intuitive interface that allows for quick creation of frontend and API tests, significantly speeding up the testing process from planning to deployment.
- **Reviewers mention** that Leapwork's support is top-notch, with users feeling well-supported throughout their testing journey. This is a notable advantage for teams that may require assistance during implementation and ongoing use.
- **Users say** that mabl's integration and implementation are simple, making it accessible even for non-technical users. The clear documentation and helpful resources, including a dedicated trainer and Slack integration, enhance the overall user experience.
- **G2 reviewers highlight** that while Leapwork has a higher overall satisfaction score, mabl's quality of support is also commendable, with users reporting quick response times to resolve issues. This indicates that both tools prioritize customer support, albeit with different strengths.
- **According to recent feedback** , Leapwork is favored by enterprise users, while mabl appeals more to mid-market segments. This distinction suggests that Leapwork may be better suited for larger organizations with complex testing needs, whereas mabl offers a more streamlined solution for smaller teams.



| | Leapwork | mabl | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.5 out of 5 | 4.4 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 107 | 40 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (48.5% of reviews) | Mid-Market (44.7% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | Contact Us Per Year | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### Leapwork

Pros:
- Ease of Use (31 reviews)
- Automation (19 reviews)

Cons:
- Expensive (4 reviews)
- Missing Features (4 reviews)

### mabl

Pros:
- Ease of Use (4 reviews)
- Automation (2 reviews)

Cons:
- Insufficient Information (2 reviews)
- Slow Performance (2 reviews)

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | Leapwork | mabl | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 8.4 (87 reviews) | 8.6 (30 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 9.0 (89 reviews) | 9.0 (30 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 8.4 (74 reviews) | 8.8 (13 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 8.4 (49 reviews) | 9.0 (5 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 8.9 (86 reviews) | 9.1 (30 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 9.3 (48 reviews) | 9.3 (5 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 8.8 (85 reviews) | 8.3 (28 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### Leapwork

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

Yes

### mabl

#### Entry-Level Pricing

Plan: Personalized Pricing

Price: Contact Us Per Year

Description: Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.

Key Features:
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis

[Learn more about mabl](https://www.g2.com/products/mabl/reviews)

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### Load Testing Tools

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Leapwork** | N/A | N/A |
| **mabl** | N/A | N/A |

#### Functionality

| Feature | Leapwork | mabl | 
|---|---|---|
| **Stress Testing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Extreme Cases** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Test Variety** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Reporting

| Feature | Leapwork | mabl | 
|---|---|---|
| **Reporting** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Automation Testing

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Leapwork** | 7.4/10 | 65 |
| **mabl** | 9.0/10 | 18 |

#### Functionality 

| Feature | Leapwork | mabl | 
|---|---|---|
| **Test Feedback** | Feature Not Available | 9.1 (17 reviews) | 
| **Test History** | 8.6 (60 reviews) | 9.2 (17 reviews) | 
| **Customization** | 8.0 (59 reviews) | 8.8 (17 reviews) | 
| **Test Variety** | 8.5 (58 reviews) | 8.5 (17 reviews) | 

#### Automation

| Feature | Leapwork | mabl | 
|---|---|---|
| **Organization** | 7.7 (57 reviews) | 8.3 (16 reviews) | 
| **Reliability** | 8.3 (62 reviews) | 9.0 (17 reviews) | 
| **Thoroughness** | 8.4 (62 reviews) | 8.8 (17 reviews) | 

#### Agentic AI - Automation Testing

| Feature | Leapwork | mabl | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | 6.3 (8 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Interaction** | 5.4 (8 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | 5.6 (8 reviews) | Not enough data | 

### Software Testing

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Leapwork** | N/A | N/A |
| **mabl** | N/A | N/A |

#### Agentic AI - Software Testing

| Feature | Leapwork | mabl | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Interaction** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### AI Software Testing Tools

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Leapwork** | N/A | N/A |
| **mabl** | N/A | N/A |

#### AI Test Generation & Authoring

| Feature | Leapwork | mabl | 
|---|---|---|
| **UI-Based Test Generation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Test Creation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Test Coverage Suggestions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Test Maintenance & Resilience 

| Feature | Leapwork | mabl | 
|---|---|---|
| **Self-healing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Dynamic Element Locators** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI-Powered Test Maintenance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Execution & Analytics

| Feature | Leapwork | mabl | 
|---|---|---|
| **Intelligent Reporting** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Visual Anomaly Detection** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Root Cause Analysis** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (2):** [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools), [AI Software Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/ai-software-testing-tools)


**Unique to mabl (2):** [Software Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Load Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/load-testing-tools)


---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | Leapwork | mabl | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 16.2% | 36.8% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 35.4% | 44.7% | 
| **Enterprise** | 48.5% | 18.4% | 

### By Industry

#### Leapwork

- **Information Technology and Services:** 12.2%
- **Computer Software:** 9.2%
- **Financial Services:** 7.1%
- **Automotive:** 5.1%
- **Transportation/Trucking/Railroad:** 5.1%
- **Insurance:** 5.1%
- **Retail:** 4.1%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 4.1%
- **Accounting:** 3.1%
- **Banking:** 3.1%
- **Other:** 41.8%

#### mabl

- **Computer Software:** 31.6%
- **Airlines/Aviation:** 5.3%
- **Computer & Network Security:** 5.3%
- **Leisure, Travel & Tourism:** 5.3%
- **Insurance:** 5.3%
- **Higher Education:** 5.3%
- **Animation:** 2.6%
- **Broadcast Media:** 2.6%
- **Building Materials:** 2.6%
- **Computer Games:** 2.6%
- **Other:** 31.6%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to Leapwork

- [Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-tosca/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (76 reviews)
- [Katalon True Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/katalon-true-platform/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (222 reviews)
- [UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/uipath-agentic-automation/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (7568 reviews)
- [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (3290 reviews)
- [Ranorex Studio](https://www.g2.com/products/ranorex-studio/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (258 reviews)
- [Virtuoso QA](https://www.g2.com/products/virtuoso-qa/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (118 reviews)
- [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/products/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (507 reviews)
- [ACCELQ](https://www.g2.com/products/accelq/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (106 reviews)
- [Qase](https://www.g2.com/products/qase/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (306 reviews)
- [Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/products/gearset-devops/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (292 reviews)

### Alternatives to mabl

- [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (3290 reviews)
- [Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-testim/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (53 reviews)
- [Cypress](https://www.g2.com/products/cypress/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (107 reviews)
- [Katalon True Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/katalon-true-platform/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (222 reviews)
- [Postman](https://www.g2.com/products/postman/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (1772 reviews)
- [Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-tosca/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (76 reviews)
- [UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/uipath-agentic-automation/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (7568 reviews)
- [QA Wolf](https://www.g2.com/products/qa-wolf/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (183 reviews)
- [TestRail](https://www.g2.com/products/testrail/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (611 reviews)
- [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/products/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (507 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### Leapwork

- Title: [Does Leapwork use selenium?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/does-leapwork-use-selenium) — 2 comments
  > **Top comment:** "Yes"
- Title: [Who uses Leapwork?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/who-uses-leapwork) — 1 comment *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "Hi! 

Thank you for your question. 

Leapwork is used by hundreds of organizations across industries, from banks and insurance companies to life science,..."
- Title: [What is Leapwork tool?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-leapwork-tool) — 1 comment *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "Comment deleted by user."
- Title: [How expensive is Leapwork?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-expensive-is-leapwork) — 1 comment *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "Leapwork is made to serve businesses of all sizes and teams of all kinds.To understand how to best scale test-automation in your organization, request a..."
- Title: [What is Leapwork?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-leapwork) — 1 comment *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "Thanks for asking. Leapwork uses AI powered visual automation that’s faster and easier so your teams can innovate and your business can continue to grow."

### mabl

- Title: [Does mabl use Selenium?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/does-mabl-use-selenium) — 1 comment
  > **Top comment:** "mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries.  "
- Title: [Who uses mabl?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/who-uses-mabl) — 1 comment
  > **Top comment:** "Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API..."
- Title: [What does mabl do?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-does-mabl-do) — 1 comment
  > **Top comment:** "Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and..."

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/leapwork-vs-mabl)