2026 Best Software Awards are here!See the list

Compare L2L and Redzone

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
L2L
L2L
Star Rating
(117)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (56.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about L2L
Redzone
Redzone
Star Rating
(508)4.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (80.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 Annual Subscription
Learn more about Redzone
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that Redzone excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to L2L. Users appreciate features like the ability to quickly pull data and create various data sheets, which enhances their operational insights.
  • Users say that Redzone's implementation process is notably smooth, with many highlighting the intuitive setup that allows teams to start using the software effectively right away. In contrast, while L2L is also described as easy to navigate, some users have mentioned that it can take longer to fully integrate into their workflows.
  • Reviewers mention that Redzone provides exceptional support, with a high quality of assistance that users find invaluable. One user noted the importance of compliance features, which are well-integrated into the platform, while L2L users appreciate the customer service but feel it doesn't always match the level of support offered by Redzone.
  • According to verified reviews, Redzone shines in its ability to monitor operational efficiency, allowing users to track metrics like OEE on a shift-by-shift basis. This capability is a game-changer for many users, whereas L2L, while intuitive, does not offer the same depth of operational monitoring.
  • Users highlight that Redzone's collaboration features are robust, facilitating plant-wide communication that supports team effectiveness. In comparison, L2L's collaboration tools are seen as less comprehensive, with some users noting limitations in cross-site communication.
  • G2 reviewers note that Redzone's customizable workflows and analytics capabilities are standout features, allowing for tailored solutions that meet specific business needs. L2L, while offering good features, lacks the same level of customization, which some users find restrictive in adapting the software to their unique processes.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
L2L
No pricing available
Redzone
QAD Redzone Pricing
Contact Us
1 Annual Subscription
Learn more about Redzone
Free Trial
L2L
No trial information available
Redzone
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
99
9.4
437
Ease of Use
8.2
102
9.2
444
Ease of Setup
8.0
66
8.6
370
Ease of Admin
8.4
46
8.9
286
Quality of Support
8.6
89
9.6
436
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
44
9.6
284
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
100
9.8
432
Features by Category
Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS)Hide 8 FeaturesShow 8 Features
8.5
31
Not enough data
Planning
8.6
26
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.4
27
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
Scheduling
8.2
27
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
8.4
29
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS)
8.3
8
Not enough data
Connected Worker PlatformHide 28 FeaturesShow 28 Features
6.9
37
8.7
392
Workflow & Automation
8.1
35
8.9
360
8.1
34
9.0
345
6.9
6
8.4
30
7.2
6
8.4
29
7.2
6
8.8
32
Execution
7.7
36
8.8
330
8.3
36
8.7
326
7.7
34
9.5
364
Analytics & Reporting
8.3
35
9.4
374
7.7
34
9.3
367
8.0
34
9.2
353
Enterprise Management
7.5
6
8.4
32
6.7
7
9.0
35
5.5
7
8.6
33
7.8
6
8.3
27
7.8
6
8.7
26
Knowledge Capture
7.2
6
9.3
35
7.3
5
8.8
26
7.5
6
9.0
29
6.0
5
Feature Not Available
Generative AI
5.6
31
8.6
178
5.5
32
8.4
176
5.3
32
8.3
174
Agentic AI
5.3
6
8.2
28
4.0
5
8.3
27
4.0
5
7.8
22
Data & Integration
8.3
6
8.4
23
7.5
6
7.9
24
Manufacturing IntelligenceHide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
8.0
27
Not enough data
Data Management
8.1
25
Not enough data
8.2
25
Not enough data
8.0
22
Not enough data
8.6
25
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
Analytics
8.1
25
Not enough data
8.7
26
Not enough data
8.7
26
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Manufacturing Intelligence
5.7
5
Not enough data
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)Hide 36 FeaturesShow 36 Features
7.5
15
Not enough data
Asset Definition
7.7
14
Not enough data
7.4
14
Not enough data
6.9
13
Not enough data
7.2
13
Not enough data
Asset Tracking
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.8
13
Not enough data
8.7
14
Not enough data
Inventory
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.0
11
Not enough data
Depreciation
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
5.7
5
Not enough data
Maintenance
8.1
13
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
8.3
14
Not enough data
7.9
13
Not enough data
Field Service
7.8
12
Not enough data
7.9
13
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Monitoring
7.8
13
Not enough data
8.2
13
Not enough data
6.8
11
Not enough data
Contract & Warranty
6.4
11
Not enough data
6.0
10
Not enough data
6.5
11
Not enough data
Analytics
7.6
13
Not enough data
7.9
13
Not enough data
6.9
12
Not enough data
Integration
7.2
12
Not enough data
6.4
12
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality Management (QMS)Hide 23 FeaturesShow 23 Features
Not enough data
8.4
17
Nonconformance
Not enough data
9.1
16
Not enough data
8.8
15
Not enough data
8.0
15
Quality system
Not enough data
8.9
15
Not enough data
9.2
14
Not enough data
8.9
14
Risk Management
Not enough data
8.2
14
Not enough data
7.6
14
Not enough data
7.3
13
Inspection Management
Not enough data
8.2
13
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
7.7
13
Compliance
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
6.7
12
Not enough data
6.7
12
Platform
Not enough data
7.9
14
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
9.0
13
Not enough data
9.4
13
Services
Not enough data
9.6
15
Not enough data
9.7
15
Not enough data
9.4
15
Not enough data
9.0
14
Predictive MaintenanceHide 12 FeaturesShow 12 Features
7.4
42
Not enough data
Condition Monitoring
7.9
39
Not enough data
8.1
37
Not enough data
8.0
38
Not enough data
7.6
36
Not enough data
6.6
33
Not enough data
Detection & Identification
7.1
35
Not enough data
7.0
35
Not enough data
7.9
35
Not enough data
Analysis & Insights
7.4
37
Not enough data
7.7
37
Not enough data
7.2
35
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Predictive Maintenance
6.0
5
Not enough data
Manufacturing Execution SystemHide 17 FeaturesShow 17 Features
7.1
10
Not enough data
Production Control - Manufacturing Execution System (MES)
8.1
9
Not enough data
9.5
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
Production Monitoring - Manufacturing Execution System (MES)
6.7
9
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
Data Collection and Analysis - Manufacturing Execution System (MES)
6.7
9
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
6.9
9
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Integration - Manufacturing Execution System (MES)
7.0
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
Artificial Intelligence - Manufacturing Execution System (MES)
4.8
9
Not enough data
6.1
9
Not enough data
5.0
8
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Manufacturing Execution System
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.7
25
Not enough data
CMMS Platform Features
7.9
24
Not enough data
8.2
24
Not enough data
7.8
23
Not enough data
7.4
24
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
7.9
24
Not enough data
7.6
23
Not enough data
7.0
22
Not enough data
6.0
20
Not enough data
8.4
25
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
L2L
L2L
Redzone
Redzone
L2L and Redzone are categorized as CMMS and Connected Worker Platform
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
L2L
L2L
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
7.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
56.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
36.5%
Redzone
Redzone
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
7.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
80.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
12.2%
Reviewers' Industry
L2L
L2L
Manufacturing
31.3%
Automotive
30.4%
Oil & Energy
6.1%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
4.3%
Food Production
3.5%
Other
24.3%
Redzone
Redzone
Food Production
54.8%
Food & Beverages
19.3%
Manufacturing
12.2%
Consumer Goods
2.8%
Dairy
2.2%
Other
8.6%
Alternatives
L2L
L2L Alternatives
MaintainX
MaintainX
Add MaintainX
Limble
Limble
Add Limble
Fiix CMMS
Fiix CMMS
Add Fiix CMMS
IBM Maximo Application Suite
IBM Maximo Application Suite
Add IBM Maximo Application Suite
Redzone
Redzone Alternatives
MaintainX
MaintainX
Add MaintainX
Poka.io
Poka.io
Add Poka.io
Limble
Limble
Add Limble
ETQ Reliance QMS
ETQ Reliance QMS
Add ETQ Reliance QMS
Discussions
L2L
L2L Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
L2L has no discussions with answers
Redzone
Redzone Discussions
Is Redzone a QMS, CMMS, or LMS?
2 Comments
Brittany G.
BG
<p>What’s great about Redzone is its flexibility, manufacturers can use it for quality, maintenance, or training depending on their needs. Having QMS, CMMS,...Read more
how do i monitor energy usage
1 Comment
Zack S.
ZS
Hi @Andy! Good to see you again. We typically monitor production and throughput more than energy (to drive behavioral change on the frontlines), but we have...Read more
Is Redzone an MES (Manufacturing Execution System)?
1 Comment
Brittany G.
BG
<p>Many manufacturers compare Redzone to a traditional MES because of its real-time OEE tracking and equipment monitoring. The difference is that Redzone...Read more