When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found ZooKeeper easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Kubernetes overall.
Reviewers felt that Kubernetes meets the needs of their business better than ZooKeeper.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that ZooKeeper is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Kubernetes over ZooKeeper.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Kubernetes
No pricing available
ZooKeeper
No pricing available
Free Trial
Kubernetes
No trial information available
ZooKeeper
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
123
8.9
68
Ease of Use
7.9
131
8.2
69
Ease of Setup
7.3
85
8.3
25
Ease of Admin
8.0
70
8.3
24
Quality of Support
8.4
105
8.5
55
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
- Container orchestration utilising available hardware or VMs, thus decreasing costs
- High Availability within a data center / availability zone
- Ability...Read more
What does Kubernetes do?
1 Comment
MG
Container orchestration and container management.
You can also configure properties on the basis of which scaling of pods will be done.
It makes your...Read more
Zookeeper is a unit where the information regarding configuration, naming and group services are stored. It is a centralized unit and using these...Read more
Does Kafka still need ZooKeeper?
1 Comment
AN
Zookeeper is required for running Kafka for the current version (3.2.3) and previous versions. However, Kafka is planning to work independently of Zookeeper...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.