When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Virtuozzo easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Kubernetes overall.
Reviewers felt that Kubernetes meets the needs of their business better than Virtuozzo.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Kubernetes is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Kubernetes over Virtuozzo.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Kubernetes
No pricing available
Virtuozzo
No pricing available
Free Trial
Kubernetes
No trial information available
Virtuozzo
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
123
8.8
44
Ease of Use
7.9
131
8.7
45
Ease of Setup
7.3
85
8.2
34
Ease of Admin
8.0
70
8.8
35
Quality of Support
8.4
105
8.3
42
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
- Container orchestration utilising available hardware or VMs, thus decreasing costs
- High Availability within a data center / availability zone
- Ability...Read more
What does Kubernetes do?
1 Comment
MG
Container orchestration and container management.
You can also configure properties on the basis of which scaling of pods will be done.
It makes your...Read more
Bogdan, thanks for your question.
In fact, Virtuozzo has its own fork of RHEL called VzLinux, so there's no need to worry about using CentOS or other...Read more
Definitely not!! (But I may be biased)
The difference between KVM and OpenVZ stems from the fact the two solutions offer two distinct types of...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.