Users report that Koha's "OPAC (Online Public Access Catalog)" feature is highly customizable, allowing libraries to tailor the user experience, while Sierra ILS users mention that its "Cataloging Module" is robust but less flexible in terms of customization.
Reviewers mention that Koha's "Community Support" is a significant advantage, as it benefits from a large open-source community, whereas users on G2 note that Sierra ILS offers more formal support channels but at a higher cost.
G2 users highlight that Koha's "Reporting Tools" are user-friendly and provide a variety of customizable reports, while Sierra ILS users report that its reporting capabilities are powerful but can be complex to navigate.
Users say that Koha's "User Interface" is intuitive and easy to navigate, which enhances the overall user experience, while reviewers mention that Sierra ILS has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features.
Reviewers mention that Koha's "Integration with Third-Party Tools" is seamless, making it easier to connect with other systems, while users report that Sierra ILS has limited integration options, which can hinder workflow efficiency.
Users on G2 indicate that Koha's "Mobile Access" is well-implemented, allowing patrons to access library services on-the-go, whereas Sierra ILS users mention that mobile functionality is available but not as user-friendly or comprehensive.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Koha
No pricing available
Sierra ILS
No pricing available
Free Trial
Koha
No trial information available
Sierra ILS
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.9
8
8.2
19
Ease of Use
8.3
8
8.3
19
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.1
8
7.0
14
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.