Users report that KeystoneJS excels in its Ease of Use with a score of 9.7, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize a user-friendly interface. In contrast, Payload CMS, while still user-friendly, has a slightly lower score of 9.0, which some users feel could be improved.
Reviewers mention that Payload CMS shines in Content Authoring, achieving a perfect score of 10.0. Users appreciate its robust features like the Rich Text Editor and Versioning, which enhance the content creation process significantly compared to KeystoneJS, which scored 7.7 in this area.
G2 users highlight the superior Approval Process in Payload CMS, scoring a perfect 10.0. This feature is particularly beneficial for teams that require multiple levels of content review, whereas KeystoneJS scored only 7.4, indicating a less comprehensive approach.
Users on G2 report that KeystoneJS offers better Customization options with a score of 8.3, but Payload CMS outshines it with a perfect score of 10.0. Reviewers appreciate the flexibility in branding and themes that Payload CMS provides, allowing for a more tailored user experience.
Reviewers mention that KeystoneJS has a strong API / Integrations capability with a score of 9.4, making it easier to connect with other tools. However, Payload CMS takes the lead with a perfect score of 10.0, which users find essential for seamless integration into their existing workflows.
Users say that while both platforms offer good Quality of Support, Payload CMS edges out with a score of 9.3 compared to KeystoneJS's 9.0. Reviewers appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team at Payload CMS, which enhances their overall experience.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.