Users report that OpenSSH excels in "Envelope Encryption" with a high score of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for those prioritizing secure data transport. In contrast, Keyfactor Command, while strong in other areas, does not have a comparable feature specifically highlighted by reviewers.
Reviewers mention that Keyfactor Command shines in "Automation" with a score of 8.1, but OpenSSH outperforms it with a score of 9.0, indicating that users find OpenSSH more efficient for automating tasks related to secure shell access.
G2 users highlight that Keyfactor Command has superior "Scalability" with a score of 9.2, making it more suitable for enterprise environments, while OpenSSH's scalability is rated at 8.8, which may be limiting for larger organizations.
Users on G2 report that OpenSSH has a lower "Ease of Setup" score of 6.6 compared to Keyfactor Command's 7.8, suggesting that users find Keyfactor Command easier to implement, which can be crucial for teams with limited technical resources.
Reviewers mention that both products have strong "Quality of Support," with OpenSSH scoring 8.3 and Keyfactor Command slightly higher at 8.4, indicating that users generally feel supported by both vendors, but Keyfactor Command may have a slight edge in customer service responsiveness.
Users say that OpenSSH's "Durability" score of 7.7 is lower than Keyfactor Command's impressive 9.0, suggesting that Keyfactor Command is perceived as more reliable and robust in maintaining secure operations over time.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Keyfactor Command
CLAaaS
Contact Us
Deploy Keyfactor Command Certificate Lifecycle Automation as a Service (CLAaaS) and integrate it with your public, cloud-based, and private CAs.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.