Users report that Keyfactor EJBCA® excels in envelope encryption with a score of 9.3, which reviewers mention provides robust security for sensitive data, while Keyfactor Command, although strong, has a slightly lower score in this area.
Reviewers mention that Keyfactor Command shines in expiration monitoring with a score of 8.7, indicating that users find it effective for managing certificate lifecycles, whereas Keyfactor EJBCA® has a lower score of 7.8 in this functionality.
G2 users highlight that Keyfactor Command offers superior ease of setup with a score of 7.8 compared to Keyfactor EJBCA®'s 6.9, suggesting that users find it more straightforward to implement in their environments.
Users on G2 report that Keyfactor EJBCA® has a strong performance in key storage with a score of 8.9, which reviewers say is crucial for organizations that prioritize secure key management, while Keyfactor Command scores 8.1 in this area.
Reviewers mention that Keyfactor Command provides better policy and role-based access controls with a score of 8.3, which users say enhances security and compliance, compared to Keyfactor EJBCA®'s score of 7.8.
Users say that Keyfactor Command's reporting and search capabilities, scoring 8.3, are more user-friendly and efficient, while Keyfactor EJBCA® falls behind with a score of 7.0, making it less effective for users needing detailed insights.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Keyfactor Command
CLAaaS
Contact Us
Deploy Keyfactor Command Certificate Lifecycle Automation as a Service (CLAaaS) and integrate it with your public, cloud-based, and private CAs.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.