Users report that Keras excels in its user-friendly interface, making it easier for beginners to get started with deep learning projects compared to TFLearn, which some users find less intuitive.
Reviewers mention that Keras has superior documentation and community support, which is crucial for troubleshooting and learning, while TFLearn's documentation is considered less comprehensive.
G2 users highlight Keras's advanced features like automated model tuning and real-time processing as standout capabilities, whereas TFLearn lacks some of these advanced functionalities, limiting its appeal for more complex projects.
Users on G2 report that Keras offers better scalability options, allowing for more extensive model training without significant performance drops, while TFLearn may struggle with larger datasets.
Reviewers say that Keras's deep learning capabilities are more robust, particularly in neural network training and testing, which is essential for users looking to implement cutting-edge AI solutions, whereas TFLearn is seen as more basic in this regard.
Users mention that Keras's model evaluation tools are more sophisticated, providing better insights into model performance, while TFLearn's evaluation features are perceived as limited and less informative.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Keras
No pricing available
TFLearn
No pricing available
Free Trial
Keras
No trial information available
TFLearn
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
50
8.7
20
Ease of Use
8.9
50
8.9
20
Ease of Setup
8.8
24
9.4
11
Ease of Admin
7.8
20
8.1
7
Quality of Support
7.8
41
6.9
17
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.