Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare JUnit and Play 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (53.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
JUnit
Star Rating
(38)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about JUnitPlay
Star Rating
(13)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PlaySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that while both Play and JUnit have a star rating of 4.1, Play is particularly favored by small businesses, with 53.8% of reviews coming from this segment, indicating its strong alignment with the needs of smaller teams. In contrast, JUnit's 41.9% of reviews from the mid-market suggest it is more suited for larger organizations.
- Reviewers mention that JUnit excels in meeting requirements with a score of 8.8 compared to Play's 7.8. Users appreciate JUnit's robust testing capabilities, particularly its support for parameterized tests and assertions, which are crucial for comprehensive unit testing.
- Users on G2 highlight that Play shines in ease of setup with a score of 8.3, as many find its installation process straightforward and user-friendly. However, JUnit's ease of use score of 8.3 indicates that while it may require more initial configuration, it ultimately provides a smoother experience for seasoned developers.
- Reviewers mention that JUnit outperforms Play in ease of administration, scoring 8.7 compared to Play's 6.7. Users appreciate JUnit's integration with CI/CD pipelines, which simplifies the management of test cases and results.
- G2 users report that JUnit offers superior quality of support with a score of 8.4, as many users have praised the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. In contrast, Play's support, rated at 7.4, has received mixed reviews, with some users noting delays in response times.
- Users say that both products have been good partners in business, with Play scoring 8.0 and JUnit slightly higher at 8.3. However, JUnit's product direction score of 8.1 suggests a more positive outlook on future updates and features, which users find reassuring for long-term planning.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
JUnit
No pricing availablePlay
No pricing availableFree Trial
JUnit
No trial information availablePlay
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
20
7.8
13
Ease of Use
8.3
20
7.4
13
Ease of Setup
8.1
7
8.3
6
Ease of Admin
8.7
5
6.7
6
Quality of Support
8.4
18
7.4
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
5
8.0
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
20
7.3
13
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
JUnit and Play are categorized as Java Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
JUnit has no unique categories
Play has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
JUnit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Play
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
27.3%
Banking
9.1%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
6.1%
Retail
3.0%
Other
21.2%
Internet
38.5%
Program Development
15.4%
Computer Software
15.4%
Think Tanks
7.7%
Newspapers
7.7%
Other
15.4%
Discussions
What are the advantages of JUnit?
1 Comment
PP
We can test individual method of our codeRead more
JUnit has no more discussions with answers
Play has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
