Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Juma and TypingMind 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Beautiful.ai
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (79.2% of reviews)
Small-Business (72.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 1 Users Per Month
No pricing available
Juma
Star Rating
(29)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (79.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 1 Users Per Month
Browse all 4 pricing plansTypingMind
Star Rating
(23)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (72.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TypingMindSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Team-GPT excels in Quality of Support with a score of 9.8, while TypingMind falls behind at 8.6. Reviewers mention that Team-GPT's support team is responsive and helpful, making it a reliable choice for small businesses.
- Reviewers mention that Team-GPT offers superior Data Security with a perfect score of 10.0, compared to TypingMind's 8.8. Users on G2 appreciate the robust security measures in place, which is crucial for businesses handling sensitive information.
- Users say that Team-GPT shines in Grammar Check capabilities, providing comprehensive tools for tone and sentence formatting, while TypingMind lacks some of these advanced features. Reviewers highlight that Team-GPT's grammar tools significantly enhance content quality.
- G2 users report that Team-GPT has a higher score in Ease of Use at 9.6 compared to TypingMind's 9.4. Users mention that the intuitive interface of Team-GPT makes it easier for new users to get started quickly.
- Reviewers mention that Team-GPT's Customizability is rated at 9.0, allowing users to tailor their experience, while TypingMind's score of 8.8 indicates less flexibility. Users appreciate the ability to adjust settings to fit their specific needs in Team-GPT.
- Users report that Team-GPT leads in API Flexibility with a score of 9.7, making it easier for developers to integrate with other systems, while TypingMind's score of 8.7 suggests limitations in this area. Reviewers highlight the seamless integration capabilities of Team-GPT as a significant advantage.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Juma
Free
Free
1 Users Per Month
Free for up to 5 people. No credit card required.
- GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet 4
- Image Generation
- Integrations
TypingMind
No pricing availableFree Trial
Juma
Free Trial is available
TypingMind
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
23
8.7
21
Ease of Use
9.2
24
9.0
21
Ease of Setup
9.2
18
8.9
19
Ease of Admin
8.9
14
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.6
22
8.6
20
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
13
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
23
10.0
21
Features by Category
Core Conversational Capabilities - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data
9.5
11
8.8
20
9.7
10
8.8
20
Interaction
8.7
9
8.6
21
9.8
10
9.0
19
9.2
8
8.4
19
9.3
9
8.8
18
9.1
9
8.6
18
Task & Flow Management - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Learning
9.2
8
8.2
18
9.0
7
8.1
18
Deployment & Embedding - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content Generation
9.4
8
9.2
19
9.0
8
8.5
19
Admin & Configuration - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
System
9.4
9
8.4
20
9.5
10
8.8
20
8.8
8
8.9
20
9.4
8
8.1
18
Agentic AI - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring & Improvement - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reliability & Safety - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Grammar
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
10.0
6
Not enough data
Formatting
7.2
6
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Product Type
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Content Generation - AI Content Creation Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - AI Content Creation Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Juma and TypingMind are categorized as AI Chatbots
Unique Categories
TypingMind has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Juma
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
TypingMind
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Marketing and Advertising
29.2%
Computer Software
29.2%
Consulting
8.3%
Information Technology and Services
8.3%
Real Estate
4.2%
Other
20.8%
Marketing and Advertising
18.2%
Automotive
18.2%
Education Management
13.6%
Computer Software
13.6%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
4.5%
Other
31.8%
Discussions
Juma has no discussions with answers
TypingMind has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
