Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare JProfiler and SonarQube 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (37.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
JProfiler
Star Rating
(33)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (37.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about JProfilerSonarQube
Star Rating
(127)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 6 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that SonarQube excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher score compared to JProfiler. Users appreciate its simple deployment process, particularly highlighting the ease of installation on Kubernetes using YAML formats, which streamlines integration with tools like GitHub.
- Users say that SonarQube provides valuable code suggestions that enhance security and improve code quality. Reviewers have noted its ability to identify potential errors in code flows, making it a reliable choice for teams focused on maintaining high standards in their codebase.
- According to verified reviews, JProfiler shines in its integration capabilities with application servers and IDEs like IntelliJ. Users find its analytical views particularly helpful for understanding memory consumption and identifying performance bottlenecks, which is crucial during release cycles.
- Reviewers mention that while JProfiler is easy to use, it has a smaller user base reflected in its total number of reviews. This may indicate less community support and fewer shared experiences compared to SonarQube, which has a robust number of reviews and a strong presence in the enterprise market.
- Users highlight that SonarQube's ease of use is a significant advantage, with many praising its intuitive interface and the seamless integration of scanning processes into their development workflows. This contrasts with JProfiler, which, while effective, may not offer the same level of user-friendly experience.
- G2 reviewers note that both products have their strengths in support quality, but SonarQube's higher overall satisfaction ratings suggest a more favorable experience for users seeking assistance. JProfiler's support is still commendable, but the feedback indicates that SonarQube may provide a more comprehensive support experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
JProfiler
No pricing availableSonarQube
Cloud - based: Free
Free
For developers wanting to try SonarQube.
- Scan of private projects limited to 50k lines of code
- Users limited to max. 5
- Architecture management
Free Trial
JProfiler
No trial information availableSonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
20
8.8
109
Ease of Use
8.2
21
8.5
112
Ease of Setup
8.9
6
8.1
71
Ease of Admin
8.1
7
8.5
63
Quality of Support
8.3
18
8.2
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
5
8.4
57
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
20
8.6
106
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
7.8
19
Not enough data
6.0
20
Analysis
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Testing
Not enough data
6.6
18
Not enough data
5.9
19
Not enough data
6.0
21
Not enough data
6.9
18
Not enough data
6.8
17
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
6.8
22
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
7.8
36
Not enough data
7.6
35
Not enough data
8.2
36
Security
Not enough data
6.8
34
Not enough data
7.0
32
Not enough data
7.9
33
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
JProfiler and SonarQube are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
JProfiler has no unique categories
SonarQube is categorized as Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), Secure Code Review, Software Development Analytics Tools, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Bug Tracking, Software Composition Analysis, Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), AI AppSec Assistants, and AI Governance Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
JProfiler
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
34.4%
Information Technology and Services
31.3%
Banking
15.6%
Financial Services
6.3%
Medical Devices
3.1%
Other
9.4%
Information Technology and Services
27.2%
Computer Software
21.6%
Financial Services
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.4%
Discussions
JProfiler has no discussions with answers
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
