Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare JProfiler and SonarQube 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cyclopt Companion
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (37.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
JProfiler
Star Rating
(33)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (37.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about JProfilerSonarQube
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviews say that SonarQube Server excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.0, providing comprehensive insights into code quality, while JProfiler, although strong in performance profiling, does not focus as heavily on static analysis, which may be a drawback for teams prioritizing code quality.
- Users report that SonarQube Server's Documentation is robust, particularly in areas like Remediation Suggestions (8.2), helping developers understand how to fix issues, whereas JProfiler's documentation is perceived as less comprehensive, which can hinder new users.
- G2 users mention that SonarQube Server offers better Repository Integration (7.8), making it easier to incorporate into existing workflows, while JProfiler's integration capabilities are more limited, which could lead to challenges in seamless development processes.
- Reviewers mention that JProfiler shines in Performance Profiling, providing detailed insights into memory usage and CPU performance, which is crucial for optimizing application performance, an area where SonarQube Server does not specialize.
- Users on G2 highlight that SonarQube Server's Quality of Support (8.0) is generally reliable, with many users appreciating the community and resources available, while JProfiler's support is rated slightly higher (8.3), indicating a more responsive support experience.
- Users say that SonarQube Server's Product Direction (8.0) is viewed positively, with ongoing updates and feature enhancements, while JProfiler's higher score (9.4) suggests a strong commitment to evolving the product, which may appeal to users looking for long-term viability.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
JProfiler
No pricing availableSonarQube
Community Edition
Free
Explore: https://www.sonarsource.com/plans-and-pricing/
- Free
- Popular & classic languages support
- Integration with DevOps platforms
Free Trial
JProfiler
No trial information availableSonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
20
8.8
108
Ease of Use
8.2
21
8.5
111
Ease of Setup
8.9
6
8.1
70
Ease of Admin
8.1
7
8.5
63
Quality of Support
8.3
18
8.2
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
5
8.4
57
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
20
8.6
105
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
7.8
19
Not enough data
6.0
20
Analysis
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
9.0
22
Testing
Not enough data
6.6
18
Not enough data
5.9
19
Not enough data
6.0
21
Not enough data
6.9
18
Not enough data
6.8
17
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
6.9
21
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
7.7
27
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
7.7
35
Not enough data
7.6
35
Not enough data
8.2
36
Security
Not enough data
6.9
33
Not enough data
7.0
32
Not enough data
7.9
33
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
JProfiler and SonarQube are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
JProfiler has no unique categories
SonarQube is categorized as Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), Secure Code Review, Software Development Analytics Tools, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Bug Tracking, Software Composition Analysis, Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), AI AppSec Assistants, and AI Governance Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
JProfiler
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
34.4%
Information Technology and Services
31.3%
Banking
15.6%
Financial Services
6.3%
Medical Devices
3.1%
Other
9.4%
Information Technology and Services
26.6%
Computer Software
21.8%
Financial Services
6.5%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
JProfiler has no discussions with answers
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
