Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Jitterbit and Tray.ai 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1 EDI Source, an Epicor solution
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
MindCloud
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (54.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Contact Us Per Month
Jitterbit
Star Rating
(583)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansTray.ai
Star Rating
(157)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (54.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Month
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Jitterbit excels in Integration with a score of 9.5, making it a preferred choice for businesses needing seamless connectivity across various platforms. In contrast, Tray.ai, while still strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.6 for Pre-Built Connectors, indicating that Jitterbit may offer a broader range of ready-to-use integrations.
- Reviewers mention that Jitterbit's Quality of Support is rated at 9.1, highlighting its responsive customer service and helpful resources. Tray.ai, with a score of 8.8, also provides good support, but users feel that Jitterbit's support is more proactive and effective in resolving issues.
- G2 users indicate that Jitterbit's Real-Time Processing capabilities score 8.6, which is essential for businesses that require immediate data updates. Tray.ai, however, shines in Real-Time Integration with a higher score of 9.3, suggesting it may be better suited for users focused on real-time data workflows.
- Users on G2 highlight Jitterbit's Data Security with a score of 9.1, emphasizing its robust measures to protect sensitive information. Tray.ai also performs well with a score of 9.2, but Jitterbit's users feel more confident in its security protocols based on their experiences.
- Reviewers mention that Jitterbit's Workflow Management is rated at 8.5, which is beneficial for users looking to streamline processes. Tray.ai, however, has a higher score of 8.8 in Workflow Automation, indicating that it may offer more advanced features for automating repetitive tasks.
- Users say that Jitterbit's Customization options are rated at 8.8, allowing for tailored solutions to fit specific business needs. Tray.ai, with a score of 8.7, also offers customization, but Jitterbit's users report a more intuitive experience when adapting the software to their workflows.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jitterbit
Standard
Contact Us
An entry-level solution for businesses looking to synchronize applications.
Tray.ai
Tray.io Embedded
Contact Us
Per Month
Integrate at scale
- All of the benefits
- Multi-region support
- Advanced on-premise connectivity
Free Trial
Jitterbit
Free Trial is available
Tray.ai
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
461
8.8
123
Ease of Use
8.6
459
8.2
122
Ease of Setup
8.4
337
8.4
74
Ease of Admin
8.7
333
8.9
71
Quality of Support
9.0
436
8.8
116
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
332
9.0
69
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
434
9.1
111
Features by Category
Data
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
9.5
13
Not enough data
8.6
12
Analytics
Not enough data
8.6
7
Administration
9.0
27
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
9.2
26
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
27
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
Development
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
25
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
6.2
14
Not enough data
6.5
16
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
21
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.4
20
Not enough data
9.5
22
Not enough data
8.6
22
Functionality
8.8
65
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
64
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.3
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
Integrations
8.7
58
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
42
Not enough data
Security
8.4
54
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
52
|
Verified
Not enough data
Support
8.5
49
|
Verified
Not enough data
Development
8.8
148
9.2
58
8.4
40
|
Verified
8.4
15
|
Verified
8.2
37
|
Verified
8.8
20
|
Verified
8.0
40
|
Verified
8.5
24
|
Verified
7.4
39
|
Verified
8.1
23
|
Verified
8.4
38
9.2
21
8.0
32
7.8
13
Management
7.7
40
|
Verified
8.0
21
|
Verified
8.2
37
|
Verified
8.7
18
|
Verified
8.6
42
|
Verified
8.1
22
|
Verified
8.6
42
|
Verified
8.2
23
|
Verified
8.1
37
7.8
15
Security
8.4
34
|
Verified
7.3
15
|
Verified
8.5
36
|
Verified
7.8
21
|
Verified
8.6
34
|
Verified
6.9
15
|
Verified
Integration Options
8.4
33
9.0
15
|
Verified
8.4
36
|
Verified
8.1
15
|
Verified
7.7
28
|
Verified
7.3
13
|
Verified
7.7
26
|
Verified
7.2
10
|
Verified
Deployment
8.4
31
7.0
11
8.5
31
8.7
15
Functionality
8.7
28
Not enough data
7.8
25
Not enough data
7.5
17
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
7.7
26
Not enough data
7.0
23
Not enough data
7.9
25
Not enough data
Data
Not enough data
8.0
18
Development
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
8.7
17
Security
Not enough data
8.3
18
Not enough data
8.4
16
Management
Not enough data
8.1
18
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
7.9
7
Application Integration
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Design
8.0
70
Not enough data
7.8
65
Not enough data
8.5
79
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
Data Control
9.0
75
Not enough data
8.8
78
Not enough data
8.9
70
Not enough data
Publishing
8.8
75
Not enough data
8.7
78
Not enough data
8.8
75
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Low-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Interface Design
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
56
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
52
Not enough data
Data Control
8.9
50
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
Publishing
9.0
54
Not enough data
8.8
52
Not enough data
8.9
51
Not enough data
Agentic AI - No-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
8.5
62
8.5
35
8.2
57
8.1
26
8.4
57
8.8
31
8.1
59
8.7
35
API Management
8.1
55
7.4
22
7.9
59
7.2
30
8.2
58
7.8
29
Feature Not Available
7.6
17
7.9
50
8.2
21
Data Integration
8.3
57
8.8
35
8.7
57
8.6
31
7.9
51
8.7
26
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Jitterbit and Tray.ai are categorized as iPaaS and API Management
Unique Categories
Jitterbit is categorized as Low-Code Development Platforms, Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), No-Code Development Platforms, Application Development Platforms, and Workplace Innovation Platforms
Tray.ai is categorized as Event Stream Processing, ETL Tools, Unified APIs, and Embedded Integration Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Jitterbit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tray.ai
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Financial Services
6.3%
Computer Software
6.3%
Retail
4.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.5%
Other
65.8%
Computer Software
30.9%
Information Technology and Services
15.8%
Marketing and Advertising
8.6%
Internet
4.6%
Education Management
3.3%
Other
36.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
What was the key moment that you realised the value of Vinyl?
1 Comment
RL
we were able to create quick websites within couple daysRead more
What is ZUDY vinyl?
1 Comment
MR
Zudy is the name of the company and Vinyl is the Software as a Service (SaaS) product they sell. It's kind of like saying Microsoft Word. Microsoft is a...Read more
Jitterbit has no more discussions with answers
Support?
2 Comments
Official Response from Tray.ai
Absolutely. We like talking with you to help you get started, coach, or co-build your dream integration. We'll pick-up your call, web-chat, email or smoke...Read more
How much does Tray cost?
1 Comment
SB
We offer several pricing packages for the Tray Platform. The lowest tier is Professional starting at $1,000 per month (billed annually) which includes 3...Read more
Trial?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tray.ai
Absolutely. Just to tray.io to request a free trial.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
