Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare JHipster and spring.io 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cloudways
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
High Digital
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (62.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
JHipster
Star Rating
(97)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (62.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about JHipsterspring.io
Star Rating
(317)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about spring.ioSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that spring.io excels in application deployment with a score of 9.3, highlighting its seamless integration with cloud services, while JHipster, although strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.5, indicating some users find deployment processes less intuitive.
- Reviewers mention that spring.io offers superior development tools, scoring 9.0, which users appreciate for its extensive documentation and community support, whereas JHipster, with a score of 8.5, is noted for its robust scaffolding capabilities but lacks the same level of comprehensive resources.
- G2 users indicate that spring.io shines in database management with a score of 9.3, particularly praising its support for various database types and ease of integration, while JHipster, scoring 8.7, is recognized for its flexibility but has been critiqued for occasional complexities in database setup.
- Users on G2 highlight that spring.io's testing capabilities are top-notch, scoring 9.3, with many reviewers appreciating its built-in testing frameworks, while JHipster, with a score of 8.5, is seen as effective but sometimes requires additional configuration for optimal testing.
- Reviewers mention that spring.io provides a more user-friendly administration console, scoring 8.4, which simplifies task management and access control, while JHipster, scoring 7.5, has been noted for its steeper learning curve in administrative tasks.
- Users say that spring.io's community support is robust, with many resources available for troubleshooting and development, while JHipster, although having a dedicated community, is perceived as smaller, which can limit the availability of immediate help and resources.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
JHipster
No pricing availablespring.io
No pricing availableFree Trial
JHipster
No trial information availablespring.io
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
66
9.1
249
Ease of Use
8.7
66
8.5
248
Ease of Setup
8.1
33
9.0
80
Ease of Admin
7.5
33
8.4
72
Quality of Support
7.9
60
8.4
218
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.5
25
8.6
60
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
62
9.1
244
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
IT Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
JavaScript Frameworks
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Development
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Database
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Infrastructure
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
JHipster and spring.io are categorized as Java Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
JHipster is categorized as JavaScript Web Frameworks and Cloud Infrastructure Automation
spring.io is categorized as Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
JHipster
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
spring.io
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
30.1%
Information Technology and Services
19.3%
Telecommunications
3.6%
Hospital & Health Care
3.6%
Government Administration
3.6%
Other
39.8%
Computer Software
26.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.2%
Financial Services
8.0%
Banking
4.2%
Telecommunications
3.1%
Other
36.5%
Discussions
Using external db
1 Comment
SV
You need to update application-dev.yml (depending upon your profile) with external postgresdb and build docker image and run with that profile. Read more
JHipster has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
