Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare JFrog and SonarQube 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cyclopt Companion
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $150.00 Per Month
Contact Us Per Year
JFrog
Star Rating
(105)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $150.00 Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSonarQube
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Browse all 6 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that SonarQube excels in user satisfaction, receiving a higher overall rating compared to JFrog. Users appreciate its simple deployment process, particularly highlighting the ease of installation on Kubernetes using YAML formats, which enhances the developer experience.
- According to verified reviews, SonarQube's integration with GitHub is seamless, allowing developers to conduct scans effortlessly. This feature is praised for enabling quick feedback on code quality and potential errors, making it a valuable tool for maintaining secure coding practices.
- Users say that JFrog is particularly effective for larger teams and high build volumes, making it suitable for organizations of all sizes. Reviewers mention its ability to scale efficiently, which is crucial for managing multiple projects simultaneously.
- Reviewers mention that while JFrog is easy to implement and use, it does not match the overall satisfaction levels of SonarQube. Some users feel that JFrog's support and community engagement could be improved, especially when compared to the more active user base of SonarQube.
- G2 reviewers highlight that SonarQube provides actionable code suggestions, helping developers write better and more secure code. This focus on code quality is a significant advantage for teams looking to enhance their software development practices.
- Users report that JFrog offers a robust solution for ML model building and deployment, with a central model repository for storing artifacts. However, the overall user experience and satisfaction ratings suggest that SonarQube may be a more reliable choice for teams prioritizing code quality and security.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
JFrog
PRO
Starting at $150.00
Per Month
Automated Artifact and Container Registry for Individuals & Small teams
- Universal Binary Repository
- Release Lifecycle Management
- Unlimited Docker Hub Pulls
SonarQube
Cloud-base: Enterprise
Contact Us
Per Year
Mission critical, scalability, performance.
- All features in Team plan plus:
- Additional 6 enterprise languages
- Enterprise SLA
Free Trial
JFrog
Free Trial is available
SonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
77
8.8
108
Ease of Use
8.2
78
8.5
111
Ease of Setup
8.2
46
8.1
70
Ease of Admin
8.5
39
8.5
63
Quality of Support
8.4
67
8.2
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
38
8.4
57
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
71
8.6
105
Features by Category
Administration
7.1
8
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
Functionality
7.5
8
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Processes
8.5
9
Not enough data
7.4
9
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
7.8
19
Not enough data
6.0
20
Analysis
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
9.0
22
Testing
Not enough data
6.6
18
Not enough data
5.9
19
Not enough data
6.0
21
Not enough data
6.9
18
Not enough data
6.8
17
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
6.9
21
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
IT Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Operations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
Management
8.3
10
Not enough data
7.4
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
7.7
27
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Functionality
6.7
7
Not enough data
6.5
8
Not enough data
6.0
7
Not enough data
5.8
6
Not enough data
Management
7.9
8
Not enough data
6.9
7
Not enough data
4.0
5
Not enough data
6.2
7
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
6.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
Functionality
6.1
9
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
6.0
10
Not enough data
Processes
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
Functionality
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
Management
7.7
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
9
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
7.7
35
Not enough data
7.6
35
Not enough data
8.2
36
Security
Not enough data
6.9
33
Not enough data
7.0
32
Not enough data
7.9
33
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
JFrog and SonarQube are categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Unique Categories
SonarQube is categorized as Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), Secure Code Review, Software Development Analytics Tools, Static Code Analysis, Bug Tracking, AI AppSec Assistants, and AI Governance Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
JFrog
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
32.0%
Computer Software
14.0%
Financial Services
8.0%
Computer & Network Security
6.0%
Internet
3.0%
Other
37.0%
Information Technology and Services
26.6%
Computer Software
21.8%
Financial Services
6.5%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
JFrog has no discussions with answers
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
