# jam.py vs web2py Comparison

| | jam.py | web2py | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.5 out of 5 | 4.1 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 12 | 12 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (63.6% of reviews) | Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | 


---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | jam.py | web2py | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 8.7 (10 reviews) | 8.9 (11 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 8.8 (10 reviews) | 8.5 (11 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 9.8 (8 reviews) | Not enough data | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 9.7 (5 reviews) | Not enough data | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 8.0 (9 reviews) | 8.2 (11 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 10.0 (9 reviews) | 6.8 (11 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### jam.py

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

No information available

### web2py

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

No information available


---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (1):** [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks)




---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | jam.py | web2py | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 18.2% | 41.7% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 18.2% | 50.0% | 
| **Enterprise** | 63.6% | 8.3% | 

### By Industry

#### jam.py

- **Computer Software:** 27.3%
- **Education Management:** 18.2%
- **Consulting:** 9.1%
- **Oil &amp; Energy:** 9.1%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 9.1%
- **Hospital &amp; Health Care:** 9.1%
- **Defense &amp; Space:** 9.1%
- **Alternative Medicine:** 9.1%

#### web2py

- **Computer Software:** 50.0%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 25.0%
- **Legal Services:** 8.3%
- **Higher Education:** 8.3%
- **Financial Services:** 8.3%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to jam.py

- [Django](https://www.g2.com/products/django/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (175 reviews)
- [Flask](https://www.g2.com/products/flask/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (49 reviews)
- [Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/products/pyramid/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (13 reviews)
- [Bottle](https://www.g2.com/products/bottle/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (13 reviews)
- [Tornado](https://www.g2.com/products/tornado/reviews) — 3.8/5 stars (20 reviews)
- [TurboGears](https://www.g2.com/products/turbogears/reviews) — 3.6/5 stars (11 reviews)
- [ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/products/arcgis-api-for-python/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (15 reviews)
- [Kivy](https://www.g2.com/products/kivy/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (21 reviews)
- [CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/products/cherrypy/reviews) — 3.0/5 stars (12 reviews)
- [CubicWeb](https://www.g2.com/products/cubicweb/reviews) — 3.4/5 stars (5 reviews)

### Alternatives to web2py

- [Django](https://www.g2.com/products/django/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (175 reviews)
- [Flask](https://www.g2.com/products/flask/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (49 reviews)
- [CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/products/cherrypy/reviews) — 3.0/5 stars (12 reviews)
- [Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/products/pyramid/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (13 reviews)
- [Bottle](https://www.g2.com/products/bottle/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (13 reviews)
- [TurboGears](https://www.g2.com/products/turbogears/reviews) — 3.6/5 stars (11 reviews)
- [Tornado](https://www.g2.com/products/tornado/reviews) — 3.8/5 stars (20 reviews)
- [Kivy](https://www.g2.com/products/kivy/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (21 reviews)
- [CubicWeb](https://www.g2.com/products/cubicweb/reviews) — 3.4/5 stars (5 reviews)
- [ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/products/arcgis-api-for-python/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (15 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### jam.py

No discussions available for this product.

### web2py

No discussions available for this product.

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/jam-py-vs-web2py)

