Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare jam.py and web2py

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
jam.py
jam.py
Star Rating
(12)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about jam.py
web2py
web2py
Star Rating
(12)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about web2py
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Reviewers mention that web2py has a strong focus on ease of use, with a score of 8.5, while jam.py slightly edges out with a score of 8.8, indicating that users find jam.py a bit more intuitive for beginners.
  • Users report that web2py's setup process is less straightforward compared to jam.py, which boasts an impressive ease of setup score of 9.8, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize quick deployment.
  • G2 users highlight that web2py's quality of support is rated at 8.2, which is slightly better than jam.py's 8.0, suggesting that users may find web2py's support more responsive and helpful when issues arise.
  • Users on G2 mention that web2py has a lower product direction score of 6.8, indicating some concerns about its future development, while jam.py shines with a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting a strong commitment to ongoing improvements and updates.
  • Reviewers say that web2py is particularly favored in the mid-market segment, capturing 50% of reviews, while jam.py is more popular in the enterprise space, with 63.6% of reviews coming from larger organizations, indicating a difference in target audience.
  • Users report that both products have similar total review counts, with web2py at 12 and jam.py at 11, but the higher star rating of jam.py at 4.5 compared to web2py's 4.1 suggests a more favorable overall user experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
jam.py
No pricing available
web2py
No pricing available
Free Trial
jam.py
No trial information available
web2py
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
10
8.9
11
Ease of Use
8.8
10
8.5
11
Ease of Setup
9.8
8
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.7
5
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.0
9
8.2
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
9
6.8
11
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
jam.py
jam.py
web2py
web2py
jam.py and web2py are categorized as Python Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
jam.py
jam.py has no unique categories
web2py
web2py has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
jam.py
jam.py
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
18.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
18.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
63.6%
web2py
web2py
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
41.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
50.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
8.3%
Reviewers' Industry
jam.py
jam.py
Computer Software
27.3%
Education Management
18.2%
Consulting
9.1%
Oil & Energy
9.1%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Other
27.3%
web2py
web2py
Computer Software
50.0%
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Legal Services
8.3%
Higher Education
8.3%
Financial Services
8.3%
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
jam.py
jam.py Alternatives
Django
Django
Add Django
Flask
Flask
Add Flask
Pyramid
Pyramid
Add Pyramid
Bottle
Bottle
Add Bottle
web2py
web2py Alternatives
Django
Django
Add Django
Flask
Flask
Add Flask
CherryPy
CherryPy
Add CherryPy
Pyramid
Pyramid
Add Pyramid
Discussions
jam.py
jam.py Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
jam.py has no discussions with answers
web2py
web2py Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
web2py has no discussions with answers