Reviewers mention that web2py has a strong focus on ease of use, with a score of 8.5, while jam.py slightly edges out with a score of 8.8, indicating that users find jam.py a bit more intuitive for beginners.
Users report that web2py's setup process is less straightforward compared to jam.py, which boasts an impressive ease of setup score of 9.8, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize quick deployment.
G2 users highlight that web2py's quality of support is rated at 8.2, which is slightly better than jam.py's 8.0, suggesting that users may find web2py's support more responsive and helpful when issues arise.
Users on G2 mention that web2py has a lower product direction score of 6.8, indicating some concerns about its future development, while jam.py shines with a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting a strong commitment to ongoing improvements and updates.
Reviewers say that web2py is particularly favored in the mid-market segment, capturing 50% of reviews, while jam.py is more popular in the enterprise space, with 63.6% of reviews coming from larger organizations, indicating a difference in target audience.
Users report that both products have similar total review counts, with web2py at 12 and jam.py at 11, but the higher star rating of jam.py at 4.5 compared to web2py's 4.1 suggests a more favorable overall user experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
jam.py
No pricing available
web2py
No pricing available
Free Trial
jam.py
No trial information available
web2py
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
10
8.9
11
Ease of Use
8.8
10
8.5
11
Ease of Setup
9.8
8
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.7
5
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.0
9
8.2
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.