Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare JabRef and RefWorks

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
JabRef
JabRef
Star Rating
(12)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (75.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about JabRef
RefWorks
RefWorks
Star Rating
(29)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (55.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about RefWorks
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that JabRef excels in its integration with LaTeX, making it a preferred choice for researchers in fields that heavily utilize this typesetting system, while RefWorks is noted for its compatibility with a wider range of citation styles, appealing to users in diverse academic disciplines.
  • Reviewers mention that JabRef's open-source nature allows for extensive customization and flexibility, which is a significant advantage for tech-savvy users, whereas RefWorks offers a more user-friendly interface that simplifies the citation management process for those less familiar with software customization.
  • G2 users highlight JabRef's superior performance in meeting specific research requirements, scoring 9.8 in this area, compared to RefWorks' 7.9, indicating that JabRef is often better suited for users with specialized citation needs.
  • Users on G2 report that while JabRef has a lower quality of support rating at 6.9, it is often compensated by a strong community of users who provide assistance, whereas RefWorks boasts a higher support rating of 8.2, indicating more formalized customer service options.
  • Reviewers say that JabRef's product direction is viewed positively by 7.9% of users, suggesting a strong commitment to ongoing development, while RefWorks' lower score of 5.0 indicates some concerns about its future enhancements and updates.
  • Users report that JabRef's ease of use is rated exceptionally high at 9.8, making it intuitive for users familiar with academic writing, while RefWorks, with a score of 8.1, is still user-friendly but may require a bit more time for new users to navigate effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
JabRef
No pricing available
RefWorks
No pricing available
Free Trial
JabRef
No trial information available
RefWorks
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.8
11
7.9
26
Ease of Use
9.8
11
8.1
27
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
6.9
6
8.2
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.9
11
5.0
28
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
JabRef
JabRef
RefWorks
RefWorks
JabRef and RefWorks are categorized as Reference Management
Unique Categories
JabRef
JabRef has no unique categories
RefWorks
RefWorks has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
JabRef
JabRef
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
8.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
16.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
75.0%
RefWorks
RefWorks
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
24.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
55.2%
Reviewers' Industry
JabRef
JabRef
Higher Education
41.7%
Research
16.7%
Internet
8.3%
Education Management
8.3%
Computer Software
8.3%
Other
16.7%
RefWorks
RefWorks
Higher Education
41.4%
Research
17.2%
Education Management
10.3%
Publishing
3.4%
Non-Profit Organization Management
3.4%
Other
24.1%
Alternatives
JabRef
JabRef Alternatives
Mendeley
Mendeley
Add Mendeley
EndNote
EndNote
Add EndNote
Zotero
Zotero
Add Zotero
Citavi
Citavi
Add Citavi
RefWorks
RefWorks Alternatives
Mendeley
Mendeley
Add Mendeley
EndNote
EndNote
Add EndNote
EasyBib.com
EasyBib.com
Add EasyBib.com
Zotero
Zotero
Add Zotero
Discussions
JabRef
JabRef Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
JabRef has no discussions with answers
RefWorks
RefWorks Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
RefWorks has no discussions with answers