Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IPRally and PatSeer 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PatSeer
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Lightbringer Patent
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (62.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 Users Per Year
Contact Us 1 Contact us for pricing
IPRally
Star Rating
(34)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 Users Per Year
Browse all 2 pricing plansPatSeer
Star Rating
(31)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (62.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 Contact us for pricing
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that PatSeer excels in ease of use with a score of 9.3, while IPRally lags behind at 7.9, making PatSeer a more user-friendly option for those new to patent research.
- Reviewers mention that PatSeer's patent database is highly rated at 9.6, providing comprehensive coverage, whereas IPRally's database received a lower score of 8.2, indicating potential gaps in its offerings.
- G2 users highlight PatSeer's superior visualizations with a score of 8.9, which help in better understanding data trends, while IPRally's visualizations scored only 7.8, suggesting less effective data representation.
- Users on G2 report that PatSeer's collaboration features, particularly its profiles and dashboards, scored 9.0, facilitating better teamwork, compared to IPRally's lower scores of 7.8 in both areas, indicating a less collaborative environment.
- Reviewers mention that PatSeer's semantic search functionality is rated at 8.8, providing more relevant results, while IPRally shines with a higher score of 9.5, indicating its strength in understanding user queries contextually.
- Users say that PatSeer's overall product direction is viewed positively at 8.9, while IPRally received a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting that IPRally is perceived as having a clearer and more promising future roadmap.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IPRally
Individual Plan
Contact Us
1 Users Per Year
Perfect for solo patent professionals who need AI-powered search and review tools.
Start streamlining your patent research with essential AI-powered functionality.
- Graph AI Patent Search - Use IPRally's propriety AI search to reduce your search time by over 50%, create your own search graphs, describe your innovation or technology using free text input, upload an image and search with our AI image search or undertake state of the art or invalidity searches by searching by publication numbers to uncover relevant prior art in seconds
- Review the results easily with our advanced review features supported by basic level smart AI assistance
- Access to our global coverage of full-text patents including translations and PDFs
PatSeer
Industrial Designs
Contact Us
1 Contact us for pricing
Looking for ultimate design research? Discover AI-driven search, global coverage, innovative filters, and lightning-fast results.
- Value-added content (VAC) search
- Powerful filters
- Citation searching
Free Trial
IPRally
Free Trial is available
PatSeer
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.9
11
8.6
23
Ease of Use
7.9
32
9.3
23
Ease of Setup
9.4
9
9.4
6
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.4
6
Quality of Support
8.8
11
9.3
23
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.7
6
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
10
8.9
21
Features by Category
Research
9.2
10
9.4
19
8.2
11
9.6
19
9.5
10
8.8
18
Analytics
7.8
10
8.9
19
8.1
9
8.7
17
8.7
10
8.6
19
Collaboration
7.8
9
9.0
15
7.8
9
9.0
17
Agentic AI - Patent Research
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Intellectual Property Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IPRally and PatSeer are categorized as Patent Research
Unique Categories
IPRally has no unique categories
PatSeer is categorized as Intellectual Property Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IPRally
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
PatSeer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
14.7%
Medical Devices
11.8%
Automotive
11.8%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
8.8%
Consulting
5.9%
Other
47.1%
Pharmaceuticals
27.6%
Legal Services
24.1%
Medical Devices
6.9%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
6.9%
Textiles
3.4%
Other
31.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
IPRally has no discussions with answers
PatSeer has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
