Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IPQS and Sift 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Byteplant Email Validator
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Nuix Neo Investigations
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Email List Verify
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (56.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$$
IPQS
Star Rating
(112)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IPQSSift
Star Rating
(565)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (56.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$$
Learn more about SiftSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Sift excels in Fraud Detection with a score of 9.0, while IPQS shines even brighter with a score of 9.6, indicating a more robust capability in identifying fraudulent activities.
- Reviewers mention that IPQS offers superior Bot Mitigation features, scoring 9.3 compared to Sift's 8.5, suggesting that IPQS provides more effective tools to combat automated threats.
- G2 users highlight that Sift's Real-Time Monitoring is rated at 9.0, which is slightly better than IPQS's 8.8, indicating that Sift may provide a more responsive monitoring experience.
- Users on G2 report that both products have similar scores in Blacklisting (9.0 for Sift and 9.0 for IPQS), but reviewers mention that IPQS's automated features make it easier to manage blacklists effectively.
- Reviewers say that Sift's Application Integrations score of 9.4 is a standout feature, suggesting a more seamless integration process with other tools compared to IPQS.
- Users say that while both products have strong Alerts features, IPQS's score of 9.6 indicates a more comprehensive alert system that users find more beneficial for timely responses to threats.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IPQS
No pricing availableFree Trial
IPQS
Free Trial is available
Sift
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
111
8.9
515
Ease of Use
9.2
111
8.9
525
Ease of Setup
8.8
84
8.9
351
Ease of Admin
9.1
77
9.0
185
Quality of Support
9.1
107
8.9
468
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
77
8.9
184
Product Direction (% positive)
9.3
110
9.4
505
Features by Category
Detection
9.1
75
Feature Not Available
9.0
59
Feature Not Available
8.7
82
9.0
413
8.8
75
8.8
407
Analysis
8.7
78
8.8
405
8.6
79
8.9
408
8.7
75
8.6
401
Administration
9.2
83
9.1
410
8.7
74
8.9
410
9.0
75
8.8
410
Agentic AI - Fraud Detection
Not enough data
8.4
68
Not enough data
8.5
68
Not enough data
8.7
69
Trading
8.4
15
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
Threat Detection
8.8
15
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Blocking
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Click Fraud
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
173
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
70
Generative AI
7.7
14
Not enough data
7.3
14
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Email Verification
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Basics - Phone Verification
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.2
17
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
Additional Features - Phone Verification
8.7
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
9.3
17
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Phone Verification
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Transaction Monitoring - Financial Fraud Prevention
Not enough data
8.8
14
Not enough data
8.8
14
Not enough data
8.8
13
Identity & Authentication - Financial Fraud Prevention
Not enough data
8.6
14
Not enough data
9.0
14
Behavioral & Analytics Detection - Financial Fraud Prevention
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Audit & Compliance - Financial Fraud Prevention
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
8.2
14
Intelligence
9.3
25
8.9
254
|
Verified
9.0
28
9.0
260
|
Verified
9.1
26
8.8
251
|
Verified
9.7
26
8.6
252
|
Verified
Detection
9.5
28
8.9
259
|
Verified
9.5
26
8.6
241
|
Verified
9.5
26
8.9
255
|
Verified
Response
9.4
18
8.8
256
|
Verified
9.2
26
8.9
253
|
Verified
9.3
25
8.8
250
|
Verified
8.9
9
8.3
229
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IPQS and Sift are categorized as E-commerce Fraud Protection and Fraud Detection
Unique Categories
Sift is categorized as Risk-Based Authentication (RBA) and Financial Fraud Prevention
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IPQS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Sift
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
17.9%
Apparel & Fashion
17.9%
Computer Software
15.2%
Marketing and Advertising
11.6%
Computer & Network Security
4.5%
Other
33.0%
Financial Services
37.4%
Consumer Services
5.8%
Information Technology and Services
5.3%
Apparel & Fashion
4.5%
Retail
3.3%
Other
43.7%
Discussions
IPQS has no discussions with answers
Sift has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
