Link copied to clipboard

# Invicti vs Qualys WAS Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/invicti/qualys-was/export.csv)

InvictiQualys WAS[+ Add Product](#)

Pricing

**Invicti**

**Contact vendor for details** · AppSec Core

**Contact vendor for details** · AppSec Enterprise

**Qualys WAS**
No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Perceived Cost

**Invicti**
$$$$$

**Qualys WAS**
Not enough reviews yet

Average Discount

**Invicti**
12%

**Qualys WAS**
Not enough reviews yet

Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience.
See it for free

Time to Implement

**Invicti** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**Qualys WAS** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

Return on Investment

**Invicti** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**Qualys WAS** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**Pros & Cons**
from reviews

**Invicti**

Ease of Use (9)

Scanning Technology (7)

Poor Customer Support (3)

Slow Performance (3)

**Qualys WAS**
Not enough data

Integrations

**Invicti**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_2a3c6c39bf8b8eb277cfcd42d9bbca1e/asana.png "Product Avatar Image")

Asana

](https://www.g2.com/products/asana/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_a50f19b266676866f77789e43f5d3a4d/bamboohr.png "Product Avatar Image")

BambooHR

](https://www.g2.com/products/bamboohr/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_2ea5f7178028686921161d65d4be481a/bitbucket.png "Product Avatar Image")

Bitbucket

](https://www.g2.com/products/bitbucket/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_585565d9550ec8fe7b5256347ebefd46/bugzilla.png "Product Avatar Image")

Bugzilla

](https://www.g2.com/products/bugzilla/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/invicti/integrations)

**Qualys WAS**
Not enough data

Screenshots

**Invicti**
 ![Invicti screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1763281/Screenshot-2026-05-18-at-3.55.13-PM.png)

**Qualys WAS**
No screenshot available

**Ratings**
from reviews

Meets Requirements

**Invicti**

**9.1** /10

Based on 60 responses

**Qualys WAS**

**9.7** /10

Based on 15 responses

Ease of Use

**Invicti**

**9.1** /10

Based on 60 responses

**Qualys WAS**

**9.3** /10

Based on 15 responses

Ease of Setup

**Invicti**

**9.1** /10

Based on 50 responses

**Qualys WAS**

**10.0** /10

Based on 6 responses

Ease of Admin

**Invicti**

**9.2** /10

Based on 47 responses

**Qualys WAS**

**10.0** /10

Based on 5 responses

Quality of Support

**Invicti**

**8.9** /10

Based on 60 responses

**Qualys WAS**

**9.3** /10

Based on 15 responses

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Invicti**

**9.6** /10

Based on 45 responses

**Qualys WAS**

**9.7** /10

Based on 5 responses

Product Direction (% positive)

**Invicti**

**10.0** /10

Based on 55 responses

**Qualys WAS**

**10.0** /10

Based on 13 responses

**Features**
ratings from reviews

Vulnerability Scanner

**8.6** /10

Based on 21 responses

**8.2** /10

Based on 15 responses

Website Security

**8.9** /10

Based on 26 responses

Not enough data

Penetration Testing

**8.7** /10

Based on 21 responses

Not enough data

Uncover more feature rated insights from real users to improve your shopping experience.

See it for free

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

**8.4** /10

Based on 31 responses

Not enough data

User Insights

**Reviewers' Company Size**

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
22.1%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.9%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
47.1%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
22.1%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.9%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
47.1%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
50.0%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
30.0%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
50.0%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
30.0%

**Reviewers' Industry**

[![Invicti](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/3bee4d2b732dab5368b9a8aa21f05e30/invicti.svg "Invicti")](https://www.g2.com/products/invicti/reviews)
Invicti

Computer Software
12.1%

Telecommunications
10.6%

Financial Services
9.1%

Information Technology and Services
9.1%

Computer & Network Security
6.1%

Other
53.0%

[![Qualys WAS](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1539625325/qualys-was.png "Qualys WAS")](https://www.g2.com/products/qualys-was/reviews)
Qualys WAS

Information Technology and Services
30.0%

Computer Software
30.0%

Computer & Network Security
20.0%

Financial Services
10.0%

Outsourcing/Offshoring
5.0%

Other
5.0%

Alternatives

**Invicti Alternatives**

 ![Intruder](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1539808658/intruder.svg "Intruder")

[
Intruder
](/products/intruder/reviews)

 ![Veracode Application Security Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d30c215643c0b745ba4951ab20b60121/veracode-application-security-platform.svg "Veracode Application Security Platform")

[
Veracode Application...
](/products/veracode-application-security-platform/reviews)

 ![Tenable Nessus](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/127e03b7d601741c15306f07b0f8cf84/tenable-nessus.svg "Tenable Nessus")

[
Tenable Nessus
](/products/tenable-nessus/reviews)

 ![HCL AppScan](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/29b6f6f7723fdb127f6c9c54b9dd756f/hcl-appscan.svg "HCL AppScan")

[
HCL AppScan
](/products/hcl-appscan/reviews)

**Qualys WAS Alternatives**

 ![Burp Suite](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1084a0792dcd7344d19c56aea015669c/burp-suite.svg "Burp Suite")

[
Burp Suite
](/products/burp-suite/reviews)

 ![Tenable Nessus](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/127e03b7d601741c15306f07b0f8cf84/tenable-nessus.svg "Tenable Nessus")

[
Tenable Nessus
](/products/tenable-nessus/reviews)

 ![Wiz](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/991dbad301661dc9e1b78a7e252252b4/wiz-wiz.svg "Wiz")

[
Wiz
](/products/wiz-wiz/reviews)

 ![Orca Security](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/7bfb8b139d34ddbb4c7f1c4dc8e7b029/orca-security.svg "Orca Security")

[
Orca Security
](/products/orca-security/reviews)

## Invicti vs Qualys WAS FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 16, 2026

### What is the difference between Invicti vs Qualys WAS?

Invicti and Qualys WAS are both highly rated DAST solutions, but Invicti is most frequently cited for ease of use and scanning accuracy, while Qualys WAS is noted for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive scanning options.

| [Invicti](https://www.g2.com/products/invicti/reviews) | [Qualys WAS](https://www.g2.com/products/qualys-was/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.5/5 (72 reviews) | 4.5/5 (20 reviews) |
| — | — |
| 9.1 | 10.0 |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Ease of Use (9 all-time mentions) | User-Friendly Interface |

### How do the pricing models of Invicti and Qualys WAS compare?

Invicti and Qualys WAS are rated similarly on value, with reviewers expressing satisfaction for both products' pricing and cost-effectiveness.

- **Invicti:** Reviewers highlight reasonable pricing and value for certification and compliance needs.
- **Qualys WAS:** Reviewers note that while the solution is effective, its pricing is on the higher side, especially for smaller organizations, but is considered worth it for medium and large-scale organizations.

### What are the best alternatives to Invicti and Qualys WAS?

The top three alternatives to Invicti and Qualys WAS are Burp Suite, Intruder, and Tenable Nessus.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Invicti](https://www.g2.com/products/invicti/reviews) | 4.5/5 (72 reviews) | — | Reasonable pricing for certification | Ease of Use (9 all-time mentions) |
| [Qualys WAS](https://www.g2.com/products/qualys-was/reviews) | 4.5/5 (20 reviews) | — | Pricing is higher, especially for small orgs | User-Friendly Interface |
| [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) | 4.8/5 (129 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | — |
| [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews) | 4.8/5 (209 reviews) | — | — | — |
| [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews) | 4.5/5 (305 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | — |

### Which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) features should I prioritize when comparing Invicti and Qualys WAS?

Buyers should prioritize ease of use, scanning accuracy, reporting quality, integration capabilities, and false positive management when comparing Invicti and Qualys WAS.

- **Ease of Use:** Invicti (9 all-time mentions), Qualys WAS (user-friendly interface cited in recent reviews)
- **Scanning Accuracy:** Invicti (Accuracy of Results, 5 all-time mentions), Qualys WAS (detailed scan results cited in recent reviews)
- **Reporting Quality:** Invicti (Reporting Quality, 6 all-time mentions), Qualys WAS (detailed reports cited in recent reviews)
- **Integration Capabilities:** Invicti (Integrations, 4 all-time mentions), Qualys WAS (integration cited in recent reviews)
- **False Positives Management:** Invicti (False Positives, 3 all-time mentions), Qualys WAS (false positives mentioned in recent reviews)

### What are the pros and cons of Invicti vs Qualys WAS?

Invicti's headline strength is ease of use and scanning accuracy, while Qualys WAS stands out for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive scanning options.

- **Invicti strengths:** Ease of use (9 all-time mentions), scanning technology (7), reporting quality (6), vulnerability detection (6), accuracy of results (5), automated scanning (4), easy integrations (4).
- **Invicti trade-offs:** Some reviewers note challenges with customer support (3), performance overhead on large portfolios, and configuration complexity for advanced authentication flows.
- **Qualys WAS strengths:** User-friendly interface, comprehensive scanning options, detailed reporting, and centralized management cited in recent reviews.
- **Qualys WAS trade-offs:** Higher pricing for small organizations, learning curve for new users, and occasional false positives mentioned in recent reviews.

### Is Invicti or Qualys WAS better for small businesses?

Invicti is better suited for small businesses, with reviewers frequently citing ease of setup and user-friendly implementation.

- **Invicti:** Small-business reviewers highlight quick setup, intuitive interface, and efficient onboarding.
- **Qualys WAS:** Reviewers note that pricing may be a barrier for small organizations, despite its user-friendly interface.

### Which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) platform has better integrations?

Invicti is favored for integrations, with reviewers citing multiple integration options and ease of connecting with CI/CD tools.

- **Invicti:** Integrations with Jenkins, GitLab, and Jira are mentioned in recent reviews, with integrations cited in 4 all-time mentions.
- **Qualys WAS:** Integration capabilities are referenced in recent reviews, but no specific third-party tools are named or counted.

### How do Invicti and Qualys WAS compare on customer support?

Qualys WAS and Invicti are rated closely on Quality of Support, with Qualys WAS holding a slight edge at 9.3 versus Invicti's 8.9.

- **Invicti:** Reviewers describe support as generally responsive and helpful, though a few mention slow or less effective experiences.
- **Qualys WAS:** Reviewers consistently praise customer support as excellent and responsive, with several citing flawless or very professional experiences.

### Which is easier to implement, Invicti or Qualys WAS?

Qualys WAS leads on Ease of Setup with a perfect 10.0 score, compared to Invicti's 9.1, indicating a smoother implementation experience.

- **Invicti:** Reviewers highlight quick and easy setup, though some mention initial configuration complexity for advanced features.
- **Qualys WAS:** Reviewers consistently describe setup as straightforward and efficient, with minimal onboarding friction.

### Which product has better False Positives?

Invicti is more frequently cited for minimizing false positives, with reviewers highlighting its proof-based scanning and low noise.

- **Invicti:** False Positives cited in 3 all-time mentions, with reviewers praising proof-based scanning and minimal white noise.
- **Qualys WAS:** False positives are mentioned in recent reviews as an occasional issue, but without a quantified all-time count.

## Invicti vs Qualys WAS

When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Qualys WAS easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Qualys WAS overall.

- Reviewers felt that Qualys WAS meets the needs of their business better than Invicti.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Qualys WAS is the preferred option.
- When assessing product direction, Invicti and Qualys WAS received similar ratings from our reviewers.