Link copied to clipboard

# Inventor vs SOLIDWORKS Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/inventor/solidworks/export.csv)

InventorSOLIDWORKS[+ Add Product](#)

Pricing

**Inventor**
Free Trial

**$310.00** Flat Rate Per Month · Subscription

**$300.00** · Flex

**SOLIDWORKS**
Free Trial

**$2,820.00** Per Year · SOLIDWORKS Design Standard Offer

**$3,456.00** Per Year · SOLIDWORKS Design Professional Offer

**$4,716.00** Per Year · SOLIDWORKS Design Premium Offer

**Contact Us** Per Year · SOLIDWORKS Design Ultimate

Show more

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Perceived Cost

**Inventor**
$$$$$

**SOLIDWORKS**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**Inventor**
26%16% more

**SOLIDWORKS**
10%

Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience.
See it for free

Time to Implement

**Inventor** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**SOLIDWORKS** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

Return on Investment

**Inventor** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**SOLIDWORKS** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**Pros & Cons**
from reviews

**Inventor**

Ease of Use (4)

Features (2)

Assembly Issues (1)

Complexity (1)

**SOLIDWORKS**

Ease of Use (37)

Features (29)

Performance Issues (17)

Slow Performance (15)

Integrations

**Inventor**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_4c36925dc95988ba0776dc2419d531be/autodesk-alias.png "Product Avatar Image")

Autodesk Alias

](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-alias/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/inventor/integrations)

**SOLIDWORKS**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_dfb12a5a88f8f2862f8227c868951fc6/ansys-fluent.JPG "Product Avatar Image")

Ansys Fluent

](https://www.g2.com/products/ansys-fluent/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_9b382ecc8231d9ab219026ed27878ac1/ansys-mechanical.png "Product Avatar Image")

Ansys Mechanical

](https://www.g2.com/products/ansys-mechanical/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_269a752fb4baefda8b9e83f98c7646dc/autocad.png "Product Avatar Image")

AutoCAD

](https://www.g2.com/products/autocad/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_74e8c2b6032e9e6ea745b0b308009973/autodesk-fabrication-estmep.png "Product Avatar Image")

AutoDesk Fabrication ESTmep

](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-fabrication-estmep/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/solidworks/integrations)

Screenshots

**Inventor**
 ![Inventor screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/135587/Inventor-Screenshot-05-06-2020.png)

**SOLIDWORKS**
 ![SOLIDWORKS screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1834212/AURA_resized.jpg)

**Ratings**
from reviews

Meets Requirements

**Inventor**

**8.8** /10

Based on 376 responses

**SOLIDWORKS**

**8.8** /10

Based on 591 responses

Ease of Use

**Inventor**

**8.4** /10

Based on 377 responses

**SOLIDWORKS**

**8.7** /10

Based on 596 responses

Ease of Setup

**Inventor**

**7.9** /10

Based on 107 responses

**SOLIDWORKS**

**8.5** /10

Based on 166 responses

Ease of Admin

**Inventor**

**7.7** /10

Based on 99 responses

**SOLIDWORKS**

**8.2** /10

Based on 58 responses

Quality of Support

**Inventor**

**8.1** /10

Based on 346 responses

**SOLIDWORKS**

**8.2** /10

Based on 529 responses

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Inventor**

**8.2** /10

Based on 94 responses

**SOLIDWORKS**

**8.4** /10

Based on 58 responses

Product Direction (% positive)

**Inventor**

**8.3** /10

Based on 371 responses

**SOLIDWORKS**

**8.6** /10

Based on 575 responses

**Features**
ratings from reviews

General-Purpose CAD

**8.2** /10

Based on 38 responses

**8.9** /10

Based on 133 responses

Simulation & CAE

**7.5** /10

Based on 20 responses

**8.3** /10

Based on 73 responses

Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)

**9.0** /10

Based on 6 responses

**8.4** /10

Based on 95 responses

Uncover more feature rated insights from real users to improve your shopping experience.

See it for free

Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM)

Not enough data

**8.8** /10

Based on 56 responses

CAD Libraries

Not enough data

**8.9** /10

Based on 40 responses

CAD Data Exchange

Not enough data

**8.8** /10

Based on 38 responses

Additive Manufacturing

Not enough data

**7.9** /10

Based on 71 responses

CAD Viewers

Not enough data

**9.0** /10

Based on 55 responses

PCB Design

Not enough data

**8.2** /10

Based on 15 responses

User Insights

**Reviewers' Company Size**

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
35.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
42.7%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
22.3%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
35.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
42.7%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
22.3%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
46.7%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
32.5%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
20.8%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
46.7%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
32.5%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
20.8%

**Reviewers' Industry**

[![Inventor](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/ce04423e3201c72cb3ff129d2325b8d4/inventor.svg "Inventor")](https://www.g2.com/products/inventor/reviews)
Inventor

Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
24.9%

Machinery
7.8%

Design
7.1%

Construction
5.0%

Oil & Energy
3.8%

Other
51.4%

[![SOLIDWORKS](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/87a0eaa40f8b9a14542c077a348a699d/solidworks.svg "SOLIDWORKS")](https://www.g2.com/products/solidworks/reviews)
SOLIDWORKS

Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
22.4%

Design
11.8%

Automotive
6.6%

Medical Devices
5.7%

Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.6%

Other
47.9%

Alternatives

**Inventor Alternatives**

 ![Onshape](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/64b9ed904ebc3f3bc714a720216f40d4/onshape.svg "Onshape")

[
Onshape
](/products/onshape/reviews)

 ![Designcenter Solid Edge](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d83699653e967e265705cdd3b757685d/designcenter-solid-edge.svg "Designcenter Solid Edge")

[
Designcenter Solid Edge
](/products/designcenter-solid-edge/reviews)

 ![PTC Creo](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/08b448f824b860f3e6ecfb4228fad4d9/ptc-ptc-creo.svg "PTC Creo")

[
Creo
](/products/ptc-ptc-creo/reviews)

 ![SketchUp](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/fcc93ca191f4edc5826c62935fefbf14/sketchup.svg "SketchUp")

[
SketchUp
](/products/sketchup/reviews)

**SOLIDWORKS Alternatives**

 ![Autodesk Fusion](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/28ab5b3990e257fc5851e9730734a9cc/autodesk-fusion.svg "Autodesk Fusion")

[
Autodesk Fusion
](/products/autodesk-fusion/reviews)

 ![Onshape](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/64b9ed904ebc3f3bc714a720216f40d4/onshape.svg "Onshape")

[
Onshape
](/products/onshape/reviews)

 ![Designcenter Solid Edge](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d83699653e967e265705cdd3b757685d/designcenter-solid-edge.svg "Designcenter Solid Edge")

[
Designcenter Solid Edge
](/products/designcenter-solid-edge/reviews)

 ![PTC Creo](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/08b448f824b860f3e6ecfb4228fad4d9/ptc-ptc-creo.svg "PTC Creo")

[
Creo
](/products/ptc-ptc-creo/reviews)

## Inventor vs SOLIDWORKS FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 14, 2026

### What is the difference between SOLIDWORKS vs Inventor?

SOLIDWORKS stands out for its larger user base, higher G2 rating, and more frequent reviewer-cited strengths in ease of use and modeling, while Inventor is praised for its customization and integration with Autodesk tools.

| [SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/products/solidworks/reviews) | [Inventor](https://www.g2.com/products/inventor/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.5/5 (646 reviews) | 4.4/5 (440 reviews) |
| Small-Business, Mid-Market | Small-Business, Mid-Market |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Ease of Use (37 all-time mentions) | Customization and Integration Capabilities |

### How do the pricing models of SOLIDWORKS and Inventor compare?

SOLIDWORKS is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its pricing compared to Inventor.

- **SOLIDWORKS:** In recent reviews, many highlight competitive pricing and good value for money, especially for professional engineering work.
- **Inventor:** Reviewers note that Inventor's cost is high for small shops, and its value is tied to its advanced features and integration with Autodesk tools.
- **Switching reasons:** Reviewers switching to SOLIDWORKS cite its reasonable pricing and strong ROI for design workflows.

### What are the best alternatives to SOLIDWORKS and Inventor?

The top three alternatives to SOLIDWORKS and Inventor are Onshape, Autodesk Fusion, and Designcenter Solid Edge.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/products/solidworks/reviews) | 4.5/5 (646 reviews) | Small-Business, Mid-Market | Competitive pricing and good value for money | Ease of Use (37 all-time mentions) |
| [Inventor](https://www.g2.com/products/inventor/reviews) | 4.4/5 (440 reviews) | Small-Business, Mid-Market | High cost for small shops, strong integration value | Customization and Integration Capabilities |
| [Onshape](https://www.g2.com/products/onshape/reviews) | 4.7/5 (725 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Cloud-based collaboration and accessibility |
| [Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-fusion/reviews) | 4.5/5 (520 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Integrated CAD, CAM, and CAE tools |
| [Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/products/designcenter-solid-edge/reviews) | 4.3/5 (647 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Ease of use and solid modeling capabilities |

### Which Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD) features should I prioritize when comparing SOLIDWORKS and Inventor?

Buyers should prioritize Modeling, Ease of Use, Simulation Tools, Assembly Design, and Integration Capabilities when comparing SOLIDWORKS and Inventor.

- **Modeling:** SOLIDWORKS (27 all-time mentions), Inventor (1 all-time mention)
- **Ease of Use:** SOLIDWORKS (8.6 score, 37 all-time mentions), Inventor (8.4 score, 4 all-time mentions)
- **Simulation Tools:** SOLIDWORKS (16 all-time mentions), Inventor (recent reviews highlight FEA and dynamic simulation features)
- **Assembly Design:** SOLIDWORKS (12 all-time mentions), Inventor (recent reviews highlight assembly management and automation)
- **Integration Capabilities:** SOLIDWORKS (15 all-time mentions for CAD Integration), Inventor (recent reviews highlight integration with Autodesk Vault and other Autodesk products)

### What are the pros and cons of SOLIDWORKS vs Inventor?

SOLIDWORKS is strongest in ease of use and modeling, while Inventor excels in customization and integration with Autodesk tools.

- **SOLIDWORKS strengths:** Ease of Use (37 all-time mentions), 3D Modeling (27), User Interface (21), Simulation Tools (16), CAD Integration (15), Assembly Design (12), Easy Learning (12)
- **SOLIDWORKS trade-offs:** Performance Issues (17), Slow Performance (15), High System Requirements (14), Complexity (11), Expensive (11)
- **Inventor strengths:** Customization, Integration Capabilities, Ease of Use, Assembly Management, Automation, and strong interoperability with Autodesk products
- **Inventor trade-offs:** Crashes with large assemblies, Complexity for beginners, Limited sheet metal and surfacing options, High system requirements

### Is SOLIDWORKS or Inventor better for small businesses?

SOLIDWORKS is the better fit for small businesses, with a larger small-business segment and more positive sentiment from small-business reviewers.

- **SOLIDWORKS:** Small-Business and Mid-Market segments, with reviewers praising its ease of use, value, and rapid onboarding for new engineers.
- **Inventor:** Small-Business and Mid-Market segments, but reviewers note higher costs and a steeper learning curve for small teams.

### Which Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD) platform has better integrations?

SOLIDWORKS is favored for integrations, with more frequent reviewer mentions and broader CAD ecosystem compatibility.

- **SOLIDWORKS:** Integrates with CATIA (38 all-time mentions) and SolidWorks Simulation (13 all-time mentions), with reviewers highlighting strong compatibility with other CAD tools.
- **Inventor:** Reviewers cite integration with Autodesk Vault and other Autodesk products, emphasizing workflow continuity within the Autodesk ecosystem.

### How do SOLIDWORKS and Inventor compare on customer support?

SOLIDWORKS and Inventor are rated nearly identically on Quality of Support, with scores of 8.2 and 8.1 respectively, indicating parity.

- **SOLIDWORKS:** Reviewers frequently describe support as responsive and helpful, with many citing strong onboarding resources and a large community for troubleshooting.
- **Inventor:** Reviewers highlight good support from Autodesk, active forums, and helpful documentation, especially for integration and advanced features.

### Which is easier to implement, SOLIDWORKS or Inventor?

SOLIDWORKS scores higher on Ease of Setup (8.3 vs 7.9), making it easier to implement than Inventor.

- **SOLIDWORKS:** Reviewers consistently praise its straightforward installation, rapid onboarding, and minimal downtime for new users.
- **Inventor:** Reviewers note an easy initial setup but mention a steeper learning curve for advanced features and configuration.

### Which product has better Modeling?

SOLIDWORKS is the stronger product for Modeling, with higher reviewer scores and more frequent positive mentions.

- **SOLIDWORKS:** 3D Modeling (27 all-time mentions), Ease of Use score 8.6, Meets Requirements score 8.8
- **Inventor:** 3D Modeling (1 all-time mention), Ease of Use score 8.4, Meets Requirements score 8.8