Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Intermapper and Paessler PRTG 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (57.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial 10000 Sensors Per Year
Intermapper
Star Rating
(84)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IntermapperPaessler PRTG
Star Rating
(178)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (57.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial 10000 Sensors Per Year
Browse all 7 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Paessler PRTG excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall rating compared to Intermapper. Users appreciate its customizable alerting feature, which provides instant notifications on server issues, enhancing their ability to respond quickly to potential problems.
- According to verified reviews, the implementation process for Paessler PRTG is notably user-friendly, with many users highlighting the intuitive setup guide that simplifies onboarding. In contrast, while Intermapper is also described as easy to implement, it lacks the same level of user praise for setup ease.
- Users say that Paessler PRTG's dashboard allows for comprehensive monitoring of server health, streamlining processes that were previously manual. This capability is a significant advantage over Intermapper, where users have noted that while it provides effective monitoring, it may not offer the same level of centralized visibility.
- Reviewers mention that Paessler PRTG's performance monitoring capabilities are robust, with a high satisfaction score in this area. Users appreciate the ability to automate monitoring tasks, which saves time and reduces the risk of oversight, whereas Intermapper, while effective, does not receive the same level of acclaim for automation features.
- Users highlight that Intermapper's visual mapping capabilities are a strong point, allowing IT departments to create accurate network maps and monitor traffic loads effectively. However, Paessler PRTG's overall user experience and alerting features seem to resonate more positively with users, leading to a more favorable perception of its overall utility.
- According to recent feedback, both products have their strengths, but Paessler PRTG stands out for its quality of support and ongoing product direction, with users feeling more confident in its future development. Intermapper, while providing solid support, does not match the same level of enthusiasm regarding its product trajectory.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Intermapper
No pricing availablePaessler PRTG
Free Trial
Free Trial
10000 Sensors Per Year
30 Day Full Access Free Trial
100% Free. No Credit Card Required
Free Version After the Trial
- Free Full Features for 30 days
Free Trial
Intermapper
Free Trial is available
Paessler PRTG
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
71
9.3
154
Ease of Use
8.2
72
9.0
154
Ease of Setup
8.4
68
8.8
136
Ease of Admin
8.2
69
8.7
104
Quality of Support
8.2
68
8.7
141
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
64
8.6
96
Product Direction (% positive)
6.6
72
9.0
145
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.5
30
Not enough data
9.6
31
Not enough data
8.8
30
Not enough data
8.8
30
Not enough data
8.6
30
Not enough data
8.8
30
Agentic AI - Database Monitoring
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Functionality
9.1
15
9.3
75
8.9
16
9.2
74
Feature Not Available
7.9
71
9.2
14
9.1
69
Monitoring - Network Monitoring
Not enough data
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.4
40
Not enough data
9.0
41
Management
8.1
13
8.9
68
9.0
16
8.8
70
8.1
16
8.0
67
Analytics - Network Monitoring
Not enough data
7.7
38
Not enough data
7.5
38
Security - Network Monitoring
Not enough data
8.2
38
Not enough data
7.6
37
Not enough data
7.1
38
Network Performance - Network Monitoring
Not enough data
7.5
38
Not enough data
7.1
38
AI Automation - Network Monitoring
Not enough data
5.7
37
Not enough data
5.5
37
Not enough data
5.8
37
Agentic AI - Network Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
7.4
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.8
8
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.0
25
Not enough data
7.8
24
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.6
27
Not enough data
7.5
24
Not enough data
6.9
25
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
8.4
27
Not enough data
8.6
26
Not enough data
7.1
24
Agentic AI - Cloud Infrastructure Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Automation - Cloud Infrastructure Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visibility
Not enough data
8.8
55
Not enough data
9.2
54
Not enough data
8.7
52
Monitoring and Management
Not enough data
8.5
52
Not enough data
8.0
50
Not enough data
8.2
50
Not enough data
9.1
54
Agentic AI - Hardware Monitoring
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Visibility
Not enough data
9.1
56
Not enough data
9.3
56
Not enough data
8.9
54
Monitoring and Management
Not enough data
8.9
54
Not enough data
8.0
51
Not enough data
8.5
53
Not enough data
9.3
56
Not enough data
9.1
49
Not enough data
8.6
48
Cloud environment support
Not enough data
8.3
41
Not enough data
8.3
43
Agentic AI - Server Monitoring
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
58
Not enough data
8.9
57
Not enough data
8.8
55
Not enough data
7.3
52
Management
Not enough data
8.9
57
Not enough data
9.2
56
Not enough data
9.1
55
Not enough data
9.3
59
Agentic AI - Enterprise Monitoring
Not enough data
9.1
24
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
9.3
25
Not enough data
9.1
24
Monitoring
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
9.3
20
Not enough data
6.8
20
Not enough data
9.3
21
Response
Not enough data
9.3
21
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
8.4
20
Agentic AI - Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.3
23
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - IT Alerting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Telemetry Collection & Ingestion - Observability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Observability Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visualization & Dashboards - Observability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Correlation & Root Cause Analysis - Observability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scalability & Ecosystem Integration - Observability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Features - Observability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Intermapper and Paessler PRTG are categorized as Network Monitoring
Unique Categories
Intermapper is categorized as IT Alerting
Paessler PRTG is categorized as Server Monitoring, Hardware Monitoring, Database Monitoring, Cloud Infrastructure Monitoring, Application Performance Monitoring (APM), Enterprise Monitoring, and Observability Software
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Intermapper
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Paessler PRTG
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Primary/Secondary Education
12.2%
Education Management
11.0%
Telecommunications
9.8%
Information Technology and Services
8.5%
Hospital & Health Care
7.3%
Other
51.2%
Information Technology and Services
25.9%
Telecommunications
7.8%
Computer & Network Security
4.2%
Computer Software
3.6%
Hospital & Health Care
3.0%
Other
55.4%
Discussions
Intermapper has no discussions with answers
Paessler FAQ
1 Comment
GR
https://www.paessler.com/support/faqsRead more
What are the benefits and drawbacks of using PRTG Network Monitor for your IT infrastructure, and what improvements would you suggest?
1 Comment
MA
Flexible Licensing:
The licensing model is based on the number of sensors, allowing organizations to choose a plan that fits their specific needs and budget.Read more
Paessler PRTG has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
