Users report that Qualys WAS excels in ease of setup, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, while InsightVM (Nexpose) has a lower score of 8.8, indicating that Qualys is more user-friendly for initial deployment.
Reviewers mention that Qualys WAS has a superior detection rate of 9.1 compared to InsightVM's 8.8, suggesting that Qualys is more effective at identifying vulnerabilities in applications.
G2 users highlight that Qualys WAS offers better automated scans with a score of 9.6, while InsightVM (Nexpose) scores 9.4, making Qualys a more efficient choice for ongoing vulnerability assessments.
Users on G2 note that the quality of support for Qualys WAS is rated at 9.3, significantly higher than InsightVM's 8.0, indicating that users may have a better experience with customer service and support when using Qualys.
Reviewers say that Qualys WAS shines in risk analysis with a score of 9.0, while InsightVM (Nexpose) also performs well but slightly lower at 8.9, suggesting that both products are strong but Qualys has a slight edge in this area.
Users report that the dashboards and reporting features of Qualys WAS are rated at 9.0, while InsightVM (Nexpose) does not have a specific score listed, indicating that Qualys may provide more robust visualization and reporting tools for users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
InsightVM (Nexpose)
InsightVM
$22
/asset*
*Price based on 512 assets minimum. Billed annually. All amounts are shown in U.S. dollars. International prices vary.
What are the typical features offered by vulnerability scanner?
1 Comment
HQ
Vulnerability scanners are essential tools for identifying and mitigating security risks in computer systems and networks. They offer a range of features to...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.