Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Imperva Data Privacy and Informatica Persistent Data Masking 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PrivIQ - Data Privacy and Protection compliance management
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Data Sentinel
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Nuix Neo Data Privacy
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (58.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Imperva Data Privacy
Star Rating
(10)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Imperva Data PrivacyInformatica Persistent Data Masking
Star Rating
(17)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (58.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Informatica Persistent Data MaskingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Imperva Data Privacy excels in its sensitive fields masking capabilities, achieving a high score of 9.0, while Informatica Persistent Data Masking also performs well but slightly lower at 8.3 for static masking, indicating a stronger focus on dynamic masking in Imperva.
- Reviewers mention that the ease of use for Informatica Persistent Data Masking is significantly higher, with a score of 8.6 compared to Imperva's 6.8, suggesting that users find Informatica's interface more intuitive and user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight that Imperva Data Privacy has a robust data subject access request feature, which is crucial for compliance, while Informatica's offering in this area is less emphasized, leading to a perception that Imperva is more comprehensive in handling privacy requests.
- Users on G2 report that the quality of support for Informatica Persistent Data Masking is rated higher at 8.7, compared to Imperva's 7.6, indicating that users may have a better experience with customer service and support resources when using Informatica.
- Reviewers mention that Imperva Data Privacy has a strong focus on compliance, particularly with GDPR and CCPA, which is reflected in its high scores, while Informatica also meets compliance needs but may not be as robust in this area according to user feedback.
- Users say that the product direction for Imperva Data Privacy is viewed positively at 8.7, suggesting confidence in its future development, whereas Informatica's score of 7.7 indicates some concerns among users about its ongoing evolution and feature enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Imperva Data Privacy
No pricing availableInformatica Persistent Data Masking
No pricing availableFree Trial
Imperva Data Privacy
No trial information availableInformatica Persistent Data Masking
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
10
8.9
6
Ease of Use
6.8
10
8.6
6
Ease of Setup
7.2
6
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.1
6
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.6
9
8.7
5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
5
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
9
7.7
5
Features by Category
Data Masking
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectivity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Imperva Data Privacy and Informatica Persistent Data Masking are categorized as Data De-Identification and Data Masking
Unique Categories
Imperva Data Privacy is categorized as Data Privacy Management
Informatica Persistent Data Masking has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Imperva Data Privacy
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Informatica Persistent Data Masking
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
30.0%
Financial Services
20.0%
Staffing and Recruiting
10.0%
Sporting Goods
10.0%
Retail
10.0%
Other
20.0%
Banking
23.5%
Information Technology and Services
17.6%
Information Services
11.8%
Hospital & Health Care
11.8%
Computer Software
11.8%
Other
23.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Imperva Data Privacy has no discussions with answers
Informatica Persistent Data Masking has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
