Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Imperva Attack Analytics and Splunk Synthetic Monitoring 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Nuix Neo Investigations
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intezer
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (48.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Imperva Attack Analytics
Star Rating
(12)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Imperva Attack AnalyticsSplunk Synthetic Monitoring
Star Rating
(25)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Splunk Synthetic MonitoringSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Imperva Attack Analytics excels in File Analysis with a score of 9.0, highlighting its ability to provide detailed insights into file activities, while Splunk Synthetic Monitoring does not focus on this area, making Imperva a better choice for organizations needing in-depth file monitoring.
- Reviewers mention that Splunk Synthetic Monitoring shines in Synthetic Monitoring with a score of 9.0, which is crucial for businesses that rely on simulating user interactions to ensure application performance, whereas Imperva lacks this specific functionality.
- G2 users indicate that Splunk's Cloud Observability feature, rated at 9.1, offers comprehensive visibility into cloud environments, which is essential for modern applications, while Imperva does not provide comparable cloud monitoring capabilities.
- Users on G2 highlight that Imperva's Behavioral Analysis is a strong point, allowing for effective detection of unusual patterns, which is vital for security-focused organizations, whereas Splunk's focus is more on performance monitoring.
- Reviewers say that Splunk's Incident Alerting feature, rated at 9.0, is highly effective in notifying teams of issues in real-time, which is critical for maintaining uptime, while Imperva's incident management features are less robust in comparison.
- Users report that Imperva's Data Security capabilities, scoring 9.0, are particularly strong, providing essential tools for protecting sensitive information, while Splunk's security features, although good, do not match the depth offered by Imperva in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Imperva Attack Analytics
No pricing availableSplunk Synthetic Monitoring
No pricing availableFree Trial
Imperva Attack Analytics
No trial information availableSplunk Synthetic Monitoring
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.1
7
9.2
23
Ease of Use
8.3
7
9.3
23
Ease of Setup
8.6
7
9.3
10
Ease of Admin
7.4
7
8.9
9
Quality of Support
7.9
7
9.2
22
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
6
8.7
9
Product Direction (% positive)
3.3
7
9.5
22
Features by Category
Experience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Remediation
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Activity Monitoring
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Security
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Administration
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Agentic AI - Cloud Security Monitoring and Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
9.3
18
Not enough data
7.1
18
Not enough data
8.7
17
Response
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.3
18
Agentic AI - Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.2
18
Not enough data
8.5
18
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.1
17
Not enough data
8.4
17
Not enough data
9.1
18
Response
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.1
8
Records
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
7.4
9
Management
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
7.5
8
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Imperva Attack Analytics and Splunk Synthetic Monitoring are categorized as Digital Forensics
Unique Categories
Imperva Attack Analytics has no unique categories
Splunk Synthetic Monitoring is categorized as Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM), Application Performance Monitoring (APM), Cloud Security Monitoring and Analytics, and Incident Response
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Imperva Attack Analytics
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Splunk Synthetic Monitoring
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
36.4%
Banking
27.3%
Legal Services
9.1%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Hospital & Health Care
9.1%
Other
9.1%
Computer & Network Security
20.0%
Information Technology and Services
16.0%
Banking
12.0%
Retail
8.0%
Accounting
8.0%
Other
36.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Imperva Attack Analytics has no discussions with answers
Splunk Synthetic Monitoring has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
