- Home
- ...
- Web Application Firewalls (WAF)
- Imperva Cloud Application Security
- Signal Sciences Next-Gen Web Application Firewall (WAF)
- Imperva Cloud Application Security-vs-Signal Sciences Next-Gen Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Compare Imperva App Protect and Signal Sciences Next-Gen Web Application Firewall (WAF) 
Imperva App Protect vs Signal Sciences Next-Gen Web Application Firewall (WAF)
- Users report that Imperva App Protect has a solid Static Content Caching score of 8.5, which helps improve website performance, while Signal Sciences Next-Gen WAF lacks specific mention of caching capabilities, leading to potential slower load times for static content.
- Reviewers mention that Signal Sciences excels in Ease of Use with a score of 9.5, making it more user-friendly for teams without extensive technical expertise, whereas Imperva App Protect, with a score of 8.3, may require more training for effective utilization.
- G2 users highlight the superior Quality of Support for Signal Sciences, scoring 9.5, which is significantly higher than Imperva App Protect's score of 7.5, indicating that users may find more responsive and helpful support with Signal Sciences.
- Users on G2 report that Imperva App Protect's Dynamic Content Routing score of 7.7 is lower than expected, which may limit its effectiveness in handling complex web applications compared to Signal Sciences, which has not been rated in this area but is noted for its robust overall performance.
- Reviewers say that Signal Sciences offers better API and Integrations with a score of 7.5, allowing for easier connectivity with other tools, while Imperva App Protect's API score of 7.3 suggests it may have limitations in integration capabilities.
- Users report that both products provide strong security features, but Signal Sciences shines with its Threat Protection capabilities, scoring higher in user satisfaction, while Imperva App Protect's scores indicate room for improvement in areas like Malware Detection and DDoS Protection.
- Bot mitigation
- Content delivery network
- Two-factor authentication
The CDN allowed us to cut costs at our data center to such an extent that it offset the cost of the service meaning the DDoS mitigation that brought us to Incapsula in the first place is almost a free bonus. I cannot say enough about the ease of...
*** STAY AWAY !!! *** They are WAY over-priced BLOATWARE, and their sales weasels are a bunch of lying scumbags who pull a bait & switch on almost everyone. Just expect to pay double whatever they promise, and don't expect a whole lot more than what you...
It's one of the few WAFs that you can easily put into block mode without the risk of dropping legitimate traffic. The company is new which means lot's of engineering ideas and enhancements are implemented.
Doing advanced config is not easy, lots of UX problems and deciding which install path to take in the first place was very confusing. Was also surprised about all the extra charges, starting with a hefty setup fee and trying to push a multi year deal on us...
The CDN allowed us to cut costs at our data center to such an extent that it offset the cost of the service meaning the DDoS mitigation that brought us to Incapsula in the first place is almost a free bonus. I cannot say enough about the ease of...
It's one of the few WAFs that you can easily put into block mode without the risk of dropping legitimate traffic. The company is new which means lot's of engineering ideas and enhancements are implemented.
*** STAY AWAY !!! *** They are WAY over-priced BLOATWARE, and their sales weasels are a bunch of lying scumbags who pull a bait & switch on almost everyone. Just expect to pay double whatever they promise, and don't expect a whole lot more than what you...
Doing advanced config is not easy, lots of UX problems and deciding which install path to take in the first place was very confusing. Was also surprised about all the extra charges, starting with a hefty setup fee and trying to push a multi year deal on us...
