Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Igor Pro and Scilab 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Alteryx
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (65.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (57.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Igor Pro
Star Rating
(21)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (65.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Igor ProScilab
Star Rating
(64)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (57.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScilabSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Scilab excels in ease of use with a score of 8.8, while Igor Pro lags behind at 7.5, making Scilab a more user-friendly option for beginners.
- Reviewers mention that Scilab's data visualization capabilities are rated at 8.3, which is lower than Igor Pro's impressive score of 9.0, indicating that Igor Pro may offer more advanced visualization tools.
- G2 users highlight Scilab's collaboration features with a score of 8.5, significantly outperforming Igor Pro's 6.2, suggesting that Scilab is better suited for team projects and collaborative work environments.
- Users on G2 report that Scilab has a strong product direction with a positive score of 8.8, while Igor Pro's score of 4.2 raises concerns about its future development and support.
- Reviewers mention that Scilab's quality of support is rated at 8.2, which is notably higher than Igor Pro's 7.2, indicating that users may find better assistance and resources with Scilab.
- Users say that Scilab's capabilities in risk data attributes score 8.1, while Igor Pro's lower score of 6.7 suggests that Scilab may provide more robust tools for risk analysis.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Igor Pro
No pricing availableScilab
No pricing availableFree Trial
Igor Pro
No trial information availableScilab
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
17
9.0
42
Ease of Use
7.5
17
8.8
42
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.2
13
8.2
35
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
4.2
16
8.8
40
Features by Category
Administration
7.4
9
8.2
13
8.6
12
8.9
14
6.2
11
8.5
14
Capabilities
9.0
16
8.3
22
8.8
7
8.0
17
6.7
7
8.1
15
7.2
6
8.7
15
Methodology
8.3
7
8.1
12
8.6
11
8.3
15
8.9
9
8.3
18
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.1
7
Tools
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
7.2
10
Not enough data
8.0
9
Work
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
8.2
13
Not enough data
7.2
12
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
6.7
7
Environment
Not enough data
7.6
12
Not enough data
7.7
13
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
8.3
15
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Igor Pro
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Scilab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Research
30.0%
Environmental Services
15.0%
Chemicals
15.0%
Higher Education
10.0%
Semiconductors
5.0%
Other
25.0%
Higher Education
21.1%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
10.5%
Computer Software
7.0%
Chemicals
7.0%
Research
5.3%
Other
49.1%
Discussions
Igor Pro has no discussions with answers
Scilab has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
