Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IConduct and Jitterbit 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1 EDI Source, an Epicor solution
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
MindCloud
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (83.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (51.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
5000 per month
Contact Us
IConduct
Star Rating
(32)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (83.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
5000 per month
Browse all 3 pricing plansJitterbit
Star Rating
(583)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Jitterbit excels in Data Migration with a score of 9.0, highlighting its seamless transfer capabilities, while IConduct follows closely with a score of 8.9, indicating strong performance but slightly less user satisfaction.
- Reviewers mention that Jitterbit's Real-Time Integration feature is rated at 8.8, providing efficient data flow, whereas IConduct's score of 8.7 suggests it is effective but may not match the immediacy that Jitterbit offers.
- G2 users note that Jitterbit's Quality of Support is rated at 9.1, with many praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while IConduct's score of 9.3 indicates a slightly higher satisfaction level, suggesting they may have a more robust support system.
- Users on G2 highlight that Jitterbit's Customization capabilities score 8.8, allowing for tailored solutions, while IConduct's score of 8.8 matches this, indicating both platforms offer strong customization options, but Jitterbit may have a slight edge in user experience.
- Reviewers say that Jitterbit's Workflow Automation is rated at 8.9, with users appreciating its intuitive setup, while IConduct's score of 8.8 shows it is also effective, but some users feel Jitterbit's interface is more user-friendly.
- Users report that Jitterbit's Application Deployment is rated at 8.8, with many finding it straightforward, while IConduct shines with a higher score of 9.1, indicating a more efficient deployment process that users find easier to navigate.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IConduct
Enterprise
5000
per month
- 8 Group B Connectors
- Unlimited Group A Connectors
- Processes (50 Scheduled/100 Total)
Jitterbit
Standard
Contact Us
An entry-level solution for businesses looking to synchronize applications.
Free Trial
IConduct
No trial information availableJitterbit
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
29
8.9
461
Ease of Use
8.4
28
8.6
459
Ease of Setup
8.2
26
8.4
337
Ease of Admin
8.5
25
8.7
333
Quality of Support
9.3
29
9.0
436
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.7
25
9.2
332
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
29
8.7
434
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
9.2
26
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
27
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Development
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
25
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
65
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
64
|
Verified
Management
Not enough data
8.3
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
61
|
Verified
Integrations
Not enough data
8.7
58
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
42
Security
Not enough data
8.4
54
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
52
|
Verified
Support
Not enough data
8.5
49
|
Verified
Development
8.7
15
8.8
148
Not enough data
8.4
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
37
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.4
39
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
38
Not enough data
8.0
32
Management
Not enough data
7.7
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
37
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
37
Security
Not enough data
8.4
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
34
|
Verified
Integration Options
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
8.4
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
28
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
26
|
Verified
Deployment
Not enough data
8.4
31
Not enough data
8.5
31
Functionality
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
7.8
25
Not enough data
7.5
17
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
7.7
26
Not enough data
7.0
23
Not enough data
7.9
25
Application Design
Not enough data
8.0
70
Not enough data
7.8
65
Not enough data
8.5
79
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
74
Data Control
Not enough data
9.0
75
Not enough data
8.8
78
Not enough data
8.9
70
Publishing
Not enough data
8.8
75
Not enough data
8.7
78
Not enough data
8.8
75
Agentic AI - Low-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Interface Design
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
56
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
52
Data Control
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
9.2
48
Publishing
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
8.8
52
Not enough data
8.9
51
Agentic AI - No-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
Not enough data
8.5
62
Not enough data
8.2
57
Not enough data
8.4
57
Not enough data
8.1
59
API Management
Not enough data
8.1
55
Not enough data
7.9
59
Not enough data
8.2
58
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.9
50
Data Integration
Not enough data
8.3
57
Not enough data
8.7
57
Not enough data
7.9
51
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IConduct and Jitterbit are categorized as iPaaS
Unique Categories
IConduct has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IConduct
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Jitterbit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Telecommunications
13.3%
Consumer Electronics
10.0%
Computer Software
10.0%
Semiconductors
6.7%
Other
43.3%
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Financial Services
6.3%
Computer Software
6.3%
Retail
4.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.5%
Other
65.8%
Discussions
IConduct has no discussions with answers
What was the key moment that you realised the value of Vinyl?
1 Comment
RL
we were able to create quick websites within couple daysRead more
What is ZUDY vinyl?
1 Comment
MR
Zudy is the name of the company and Vinyl is the Software as a Service (SaaS) product they sell. It's kind of like saying Microsoft Word. Microsoft is a...Read more
Jitterbit has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
