Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare IBM Workload Automation and RunMyJobs

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
IBM Workload Automation
IBM Workload Automation
Star Rating
(14)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM Workload Automation
RunMyJobs
RunMyJobs
Star Rating
(134)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (73.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about RunMyJobs
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Redwood Software excels in job scheduling with a score of 9.7, highlighting its intuitive interface and robust features that allow for seamless management of complex scheduling tasks. In contrast, IBM Workload Automation received a lower score of 8.8, with reviewers mentioning that while it is functional, it lacks some of the advanced scheduling capabilities found in Redwood.
  • Reviewers mention that Redwood Software's automation capabilities are particularly strong, scoring 9.5 in workload processing. Users appreciate its ability to handle large volumes of tasks efficiently. On the other hand, IBM Workload Automation, with a score of 8.8, is noted for its intelligent automation but is seen as less effective in high-volume scenarios.
  • G2 users highlight the ease of administration in Redwood Software, scoring 9.3, which is attributed to its user-friendly administration console. In comparison, IBM Workload Automation scored 8.3, with users reporting that its administration features can be cumbersome and less intuitive.
  • Users on G2 report that Redwood Software's reporting capabilities are robust, with a score of 9.2, allowing for detailed insights and customizable reports. Conversely, IBM Workload Automation, while functional, received a lower score of 8.0, with reviewers mentioning that its reporting features are not as comprehensive or user-friendly.
  • Reviewers say that Redwood Software shines in proactive workflow management, scoring 9.3, which helps in identifying potential issues before they escalate. In contrast, IBM Workload Automation scored 8.0, with users mentioning that its proactive features are less effective and can lead to missed opportunities for optimization.
  • Users report that Redwood Software's integration capabilities are strong, with a score of 8.8, allowing for seamless connections with various third-party applications. IBM Workload Automation, however, scored lower at 7.2, with reviewers mentioning challenges in integrating with other systems, which can hinder overall functionality.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Workload Automation
No pricing available
RunMyJobs
Consumption-Based Pricing
Contact Us
Learn more about RunMyJobs
Free Trial
IBM Workload Automation
No trial information available
RunMyJobs
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
8
9.2
94
Ease of Use
9.0
8
9.1
95
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.8
87
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.2
87
Quality of Support
8.3
8
9.1
96
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.3
87
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
8
9.0
94
Features by Category
8.6
8
8.6
83
Automation
8.8
7
9.4
77
8.3
6
9.1
74
9.0
5
8.7
60
Administration
8.3
7
9.0
78
9.5
7
9.0
75
9.3
7
8.7
71
8.0
5
9.0
59
8.7
5
9.3
66
9.0
5
9.2
62
Functionality
8.8
7
9.7
79
7.2
6
8.4
65
Not enough data
8.5
63
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
6.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.1
19
Reconciliation
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
9.2
12
Reporting
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
9.1
13
Closing Process
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
8.8
14
Not enough data
9.0
10
AI - Financial Close
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration & Adaptability - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - SAP Store
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Accounting & FinanceHide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Workload Automation
IBM Workload Automation
RunMyJobs
RunMyJobs
IBM Workload Automation and RunMyJobs are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
IBM Workload Automation
IBM Workload Automation is categorized as Batch Management
RunMyJobs
RunMyJobs is categorized as Financial Close, Process Orchestration, and SAP Store
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Workload Automation
IBM Workload Automation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
23.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
53.8%
RunMyJobs
RunMyJobs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
10.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
16.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
73.8%
Reviewers' Industry
IBM Workload Automation
IBM Workload Automation
Information Technology and Services
38.5%
Hospital & Health Care
15.4%
Financial Services
15.4%
Retail
7.7%
Logistics and Supply Chain
7.7%
Other
15.4%
RunMyJobs
RunMyJobs
Computer Software
14.6%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
6.9%
Utilities
5.4%
Chemicals
5.4%
Other
57.7%
Alternatives
IBM Workload Automation
IBM Workload Automation Alternatives
Control-M
Control-M
Add Control-M
JAMS
JAMS
Add JAMS
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
Add ActiveBatch
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Add PagerDuty
RunMyJobs
RunMyJobs Alternatives
BlackLine Financial Close Management
BlackLine Financial Close Management
Add BlackLine Financial Close Management
JAMS
JAMS
Add JAMS
Stonebranch
Stonebranch
Add Stonebranch
Control-M
Control-M
Add Control-M
Discussions
IBM Workload Automation
IBM Workload Automation Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
IBM Workload Automation has no discussions with answers
RunMyJobs
RunMyJobs Discussions
What is Redwood automation?
2 Comments
Nitesh B.
NB
It is a batch job automation with much more capabilities. One can schedule n number of batch jobs using this tool. It can be SAP or non SAP like application...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
RunMyJobs has no more discussions with answers