Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM watsonx.governance and Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
IBM watsonx.governance
Star Rating
(64)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about IBM watsonx.governanceMicrosoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management
Star Rating
(12)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management excels in Data Lineage with a score of 9.2, allowing for clear tracking of data flow and transformations, which is crucial for compliance and auditing. In contrast, IBM watsonx.governance received a lower score of 8.2, indicating less robust capabilities in this area.
- Reviewers mention that the Reporting and Visualization features in Microsoft Purview are highly rated at 9.8, providing users with powerful tools to create insightful dashboards. Users on G2 note that IBM watsonx.governance, with a score of 8.4, lacks some of the advanced visualization options that Purview offers.
- G2 users highlight the superior Ease of Use of Microsoft Purview, scoring 8.9, which is significantly higher than IBM watsonx.governance's score of 7.4. Reviewers say that Purview's intuitive interface makes it easier for teams to adopt and utilize effectively.
- Users say that Microsoft Purview's Policy Enforcement capabilities are particularly strong, with a score of 9.8, ensuring that data governance policies are consistently applied. In comparison, IBM watsonx.governance scored 7.9, suggesting that users may face challenges in maintaining compliance.
- Reviewers mention that the Data Discovery feature in Microsoft Purview, rated at 9.2, allows for efficient identification and classification of data assets, which is essential for effective data management. IBM watsonx.governance, while scoring 8.4, does not provide the same level of ease in discovering data assets.
- Users report that Microsoft Purview's Training and Guidelines feature is rated at 9.0, providing comprehensive resources for users to understand the software better. In contrast, IBM watsonx.governance's score of 7.9 indicates that users may find it less supportive in terms of onboarding and training materials.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM watsonx.governance
No pricing availableMicrosoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
IBM watsonx.governance
Free Trial is available
Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
43
8.5
12
Ease of Use
7.7
49
8.5
12
Ease of Setup
7.4
47
8.7
9
Ease of Admin
8.0
17
8.9
9
Quality of Support
8.3
42
8.5
12
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
17
8.9
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
43
10.0
12
Features by Category
Administration
8.5
33
9.4
8
8.4
32
9.0
8
8.6
32
9.3
7
8.6
31
9.2
8
Management
8.1
32
8.8
8
8.5
31
9.2
8
8.5
32
8.5
8
8.6
32
9.8
8
8.4
32
9.2
8
Compliance
8.6
32
9.4
8
8.2
32
9.0
8
8.1
32
9.8
7
8.5
31
9.2
8
Security
8.6
32
9.4
8
8.4
32
9.6
8
8.5
33
9.4
8
Data Quality
8.4
32
9.0
7
8.4
31
9.8
8
8.4
31
9.4
8
Maintainence
8.5
32
8.8
8
8.4
32
9.4
8
Generative AI
8.5
24
8.6
7
8.5
24
9.0
8
Agentic AI - Data Governance
9.4
9
Not enough data
9.6
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
AI Compliance
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
Risk Management & Monitoring
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
8.3
8
Not enough data
Access Control and Security
9.0
8
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
7.9
8
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM watsonx.governance and Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management are categorized as Data Governance
Unique Categories
IBM watsonx.governance is categorized as AI Governance Tools
Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM watsonx.governance
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
16.3%
Consulting
12.2%
Computer Software
12.2%
Financial Services
10.2%
Computer & Network Security
8.2%
Other
40.8%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Financial Services
16.7%
Medical Practice
8.3%
Market Research
8.3%
Investment Banking
8.3%
Other
41.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
IBM watsonx.governance has no discussions with answers
Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
