Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM watsonx.data and Starburst 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ILUM
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (36.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (46.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
IBM watsonx.data
Star Rating
(93)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (36.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about IBM watsonx.dataStarburst
Star Rating
(93)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about StarburstSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Starburst excels in "Ease of Use" with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for a user-friendly interface, while IBM watsonx.data, with a score of 8.4, is noted to have a steeper learning curve.
- Reviewers mention that Starburst's "Data Querying" capabilities are highly rated at 9.1, allowing for efficient data retrieval, whereas IBM watsonx.data, scoring 8.8, also performs well but lacks some of the advanced querying features that Starburst offers.
- G2 users highlight Starburst's superior "Quality of Support" with a score of 9.1, indicating that users feel well-supported, while IBM watsonx.data's support, rated at 8.4, is seen as adequate but not as responsive or helpful.
- Users on G2 report that Starburst's "Data Integration" score of 8.6 is a strong point, particularly for organizations needing to connect various data sources seamlessly, while IBM watsonx.data, lacking in this area with no score provided, may face challenges in integration flexibility.
- Reviewers mention that Starburst shines in "Real-Time Analytics" with a score of 8.0, which is crucial for businesses needing immediate insights, while IBM watsonx.data, scoring 8.8, offers robust real-time capabilities but may not match the speed of Starburst in certain scenarios.
- Users say that Starburst's "Data Lake" functionality, rated at 8.3, is effective for managing large datasets, while IBM watsonx.data, with a score of 8.6, provides solid performance but lacks some of the advanced features that Starburst users have come to appreciate.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM watsonx.data
No pricing availableStarburst
No pricing availableFree Trial
IBM watsonx.data
Free Trial is available
Starburst
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
70
8.8
83
Ease of Use
8.0
82
9.1
84
Ease of Setup
7.6
75
8.5
75
Ease of Admin
7.6
30
8.5
44
Quality of Support
8.3
65
9.1
83
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.0
29
9.0
42
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
70
9.9
82
Features by Category
Administration
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Management
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Compliance
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Security
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Data Quality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Maintainence
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Governance
6.0
5
Not enough data
6.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Science and Machine Learning PlatformsHide 25 FeaturesShow 25 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
System
Not enough data
Not enough data
Model Development
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Model Development
Not enough data
Not enough data
Machine/Deep Learning Services
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Machine/Deep Learning Services
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.3
6
8.5
20
8.6
6
8.2
20
8.3
6
7.8
21
8.3
6
8.1
17
7.5
6
7.1
18
8.1
6
8.3
19
Integration
8.6
6
7.7
17
8.3
6
8.8
21
8.6
6
9.0
22
Deployment
8.1
6
7.6
18
9.4
6
8.8
19
Performance
8.6
6
9.0
22
Security
9.2
6
7.5
20
9.4
6
8.4
21
Generative AI
8.3
5
6.1
9
8.7
5
5.9
9
Data Management
8.2
46
Not enough data
8.3
45
Not enough data
8.5
45
Not enough data
Data as a Service
8.3
45
Not enough data
8.5
45
Not enough data
Architecture
8.2
45
Not enough data
8.4
45
Not enough data
Database
8.6
28
8.0
51
8.8
27
9.0
48
8.6
28
8.4
49
Integrations
8.3
28
8.5
37
8.5
27
8.3
40
Platform
8.4
27
8.3
41
8.6
28
8.2
38
8.5
27
8.3
40
Processing
8.8
27
7.9
39
8.9
25
8.2
41
Data Transformation
7.2
9
7.9
43
7.2
9
9.1
52
Connectivity
7.2
9
8.6
43
7.4
9
Feature Not Available
8.0
9
8.8
47
7.4
9
9.1
41
Operations
7.5
10
8.0
42
8.0
10
7.9
36
8.0
9
7.4
33
6.8
10
7.3
32
7.8
10
7.0
30
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM watsonx.data and Starburst are categorized as Big Data Processing and Distribution, Big Data Analytics, and Data Warehouse
Unique Categories
IBM watsonx.data is categorized as Data as a Service (DaaS), Data Governance, Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms, and ETL Tools
Starburst has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM watsonx.data
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Starburst
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
24.4%
Computer Software
14.6%
Consulting
8.5%
Financial Services
7.3%
Banking
6.1%
Other
39.0%
Information Technology and Services
13.0%
Financial Services
12.0%
Banking
8.7%
Computer Software
7.6%
Retail
6.5%
Other
52.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
IBM watsonx.data has no discussions with answers
Starburst has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
