Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM Verify CIAM and PingFederate 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
GateKeeper Proximity Authentication
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
P0 Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Hire2Retire
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (75.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$1.71 / user, per month
No pricing available
IBM Verify CIAM
Star Rating
(173)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$1.71 / user, per month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 5 pricing plansPingFederate
Star Rating
(34)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (75.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PingFederateSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that IBM Verify excels in its Multi-Factor Authentication capabilities, scoring 9.0, which reviewers mention provides a robust security layer. In contrast, PingFederate, while still strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.7 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that PingFederate shines in Federation/SAML support, particularly for service provider (sp) configurations, where it scores 9.1 compared to IBM Verify's 8.0. This makes PingFederate a preferred choice for organizations heavily reliant on SAML integrations.
- Users on G2 highlight the ease of Self-Service Password Administration in both products, with both scoring 8.9. However, IBM Verify's additional features in this area are noted to enhance user experience, making it slightly more favorable for end-users.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Verify's Cloud Directory feature is rated highly at 9.0, which is a significant advantage for organizations looking for cloud-based identity solutions. PingFederate, however, scores lower at 7.8, indicating a potential gap in cloud capabilities.
- G2 users report that PingFederate's Mobile App Usability is rated at 9.0, which is slightly lower than IBM Verify's impressive score of 9.4. This suggests that IBM Verify may offer a more user-friendly mobile experience.
- Users say that IBM Verify's Role Management feature, scoring 7.7, is less robust compared to PingFederate's 9.2. This indicates that organizations with complex role requirements may find PingFederate to be a better fit for their needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Verify CIAM
Single sign-on (SSO)
$1.71
/ user, per month
Price shown for example company with 5,000 employees.
PingFederate
No pricing availableFree Trial
IBM Verify CIAM
Free Trial is available
PingFederate
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
131
9.4
19
Ease of Use
8.3
137
8.6
19
Ease of Setup
7.5
89
8.6
16
Ease of Admin
8.1
48
8.2
14
Quality of Support
8.5
131
8.9
19
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
48
8.8
16
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
135
9.4
18
Features by Category
Authentication Options
8.8
26
8.9
17
8.2
25
8.8
16
8.8
26
9.1
17
8.7
25
9.2
17
7.9
24
9.1
16
8.2
24
9.2
16
Access Control Types
8.7
25
8.9
17
8.6
24
8.8
17
8.5
24
9.0
16
8.0
24
8.8
16
7.8
24
8.9
14
Administration
7.4
26
8.6
16
8.8
25
8.9
17
8.3
25
8.6
16
7.9
24
8.5
17
8.5
22
9.0
15
Platform
8.4
25
8.9
16
8.3
24
8.6
17
8.4
25
8.8
16
8.3
24
8.7
17
8.5
26
8.9
16
8.4
25
8.5
16
8.1
24
9.0
15
User on/off Boarding
7.5
17
|
Verified
8.6
7
7.7
17
|
Verified
8.6
7
6.9
16
|
Verified
9.2
8
7.6
16
|
Verified
8.8
8
8.0
16
|
Verified
9.0
7
8.0
15
|
Verified
8.8
7
User Maintenance
7.9
15
|
Verified
8.6
7
8.3
14
|
Verified
8.3
7
7.5
14
|
Verified
7.6
7
Governance
8.3
13
8.8
7
8.2
14
|
Verified
8.6
7
Administration
8.6
16
|
Verified
8.8
7
8.9
12
|
Verified
9.4
6
7.4
15
|
Verified
8.3
7
6.9
14
|
Verified
9.4
6
Authentication type
8.7
62
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
61
Not enough data
8.7
62
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
58
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
60
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
57
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
60
|
Verified
Not enough data
Functionality
8.2
60
Not enough data
8.6
58
Not enough data
Implementation
7.8
62
Not enough data
7.8
60
Not enough data
8.3
59
Not enough data
Administration
8.8
19
Not enough data
8.0
19
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
6.0
8
Not enough data
Administration
8.8
19
Not enough data
8.0
19
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
6.0
8
Not enough data
Authentication
9.2
13
Not enough data
9.3
12
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
10.0
5
Not enough data
User Experience
6.9
12
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
5.7
5
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
33
Not enough data
8.6
33
Not enough data
8.7
33
Not enough data
8.5
32
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
8.8
32
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
8.3
33
Not enough data
Functionality
8.2
30
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
29
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
29
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
29
Not enough data
8.3
29
Not enough data
7.8
29
|
Verified
Not enough data
AI Authentication Risk Management - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Biometric & Behavioral Analysis - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Context-Aware Security Controls - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
7.7
28
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
31
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Functionality
8.5
65
Not enough data
8.7
63
Not enough data
8.9
63
Not enough data
8.8
67
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
9.1
65
Not enough data
Type
8.3
62
Not enough data
8.5
62
Not enough data
Reporting
8.5
63
Not enough data
8.5
63
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Authentication & Authorization - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
8.6
6
Not enough data
Administration & Governance - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
9.0
7
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Verify CIAM and PingFederate are categorized as User Provisioning and Governance Tools and Single Sign-On (SSO)
Unique Categories
PingFederate has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Verify CIAM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
PingFederate
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
19.5%
Computer Software
18.2%
Financial Services
6.5%
Telecommunications
3.2%
Marketing and Advertising
3.2%
Other
49.4%
Information Technology and Services
21.4%
Pharmaceuticals
10.7%
Computer Software
10.7%
Computer & Network Security
10.7%
Utilities
3.6%
Other
42.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
IBM Verify CIAM has no discussions with answers
PingFederate has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
