Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM Verify CIAM and Microsoft Entra ID 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
iubenda
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Ketch
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
GateKeeper Proximity Authentication
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (38.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$1.71 / user, per month
Free
IBM Verify CIAM
Star Rating
(160)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$1.71 / user, per month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 5 pricing plansMicrosoft Entra ID
Star Rating
(789)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that IBM Verify excels in its Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) capabilities, with a score of 9.0, while Microsoft Entra ID slightly outperforms it with a score of 9.3. Reviewers mention that Entra ID's MFA options are more diverse and user-friendly, enhancing security without compromising user experience.
- Reviewers mention that Microsoft Entra ID offers superior Self-Service Access Requests, scoring 9.0 compared to IBM Verify's 7.8. Users on G2 appreciate the streamlined process in Entra ID, which allows for quicker access management and reduces administrative overhead.
- Users say that IBM Verify's Role Management feature scores 9.1, indicating strong capabilities, but Microsoft Entra ID significantly outshines it with a score of 9.2. Reviewers highlight that Entra ID provides more intuitive role assignment and management tools, making it easier for organizations to enforce access policies.
- G2 users report that IBM Verify's Ease of Setup is rated at 7.6, which some find cumbersome, while Microsoft Entra ID scores 8.6, indicating a more user-friendly installation process. Reviewers mention that Entra ID's setup is straightforward, allowing for quicker deployment in enterprise environments.
- Users on G2 highlight that Microsoft Entra ID's Policy Management feature scores 9.0, compared to IBM Verify's 8.7. Reviewers mention that Entra ID provides more robust policy enforcement tools, which are essential for compliance and security in larger organizations.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Verify's Quality of Support is rated at 8.5, while Microsoft Entra ID scores slightly higher at 8.7. Users report that Entra ID's support team is more responsive and helpful, which is crucial for organizations that rely on timely assistance for their identity management needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Verify CIAM
Single sign-on (SSO)
$1.71
/ user, per month
Price shown for example company with 5,000 employees.
Microsoft Entra ID
Azure Active Directory Free
Free
The free edition of Azure AD is included with a subscription of a commercial online service such as Azure, Dynamics 365, Intune, Power Platform, and others.
- Partially Included: Authentication, single sign-on and multifactor authentication (MFA)
- Partially Included: Applications Access
- Partially Included: Authorization and Conditional Access
Free Trial
IBM Verify CIAM
Free Trial is available
Microsoft Entra ID
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
126
9.1
625
Ease of Use
8.3
131
8.8
629
Ease of Setup
7.4
83
8.6
352
Ease of Admin
8.0
45
8.8
339
Quality of Support
8.6
126
8.7
569
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
45
9.1
328
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
130
9.4
606
Features by Category
Authentication Options
8.8
26
9.0
207
8.2
25
8.9
198
8.8
25
9.3
199
8.7
25
8.8
200
7.9
24
8.7
168
8.2
24
8.8
158
Access Control Types
8.7
25
8.9
189
8.6
24
8.9
188
8.5
24
8.9
188
8.0
24
8.8
166
7.8
24
8.7
165
Administration
7.5
25
8.9
186
8.8
25
9.0
196
8.3
25
8.9
197
7.9
24
8.7
200
8.5
22
8.9
191
Platform
8.4
25
8.7
170
8.3
24
8.9
168
8.4
25
9.0
184
8.3
24
8.7
162
8.5
26
8.9
178
8.4
25
8.8
174
8.1
24
8.6
159
User on/off Boarding
7.5
17
|
Verified
8.9
70
|
Verified
7.7
17
|
Verified
8.8
72
|
Verified
6.9
16
|
Verified
9.1
78
|
Verified
7.6
16
|
Verified
9.2
76
|
Verified
8.0
16
|
Verified
9.0
77
|
Verified
8.0
15
|
Verified
8.9
68
|
Verified
User Maintenance
7.9
15
|
Verified
9.0
73
|
Verified
8.3
14
|
Verified
8.5
71
|
Verified
7.5
14
|
Verified
8.6
71
|
Verified
Governance
8.3
13
8.9
76
|
Verified
8.2
14
|
Verified
8.8
71
|
Verified
Administration
8.6
16
|
Verified
8.7
77
|
Verified
8.9
12
|
Verified
8.4
65
|
Verified
7.4
15
|
Verified
8.9
79
|
Verified
6.9
14
|
Verified
8.8
71
|
Verified
Authentication type
8.7
62
|
Verified
8.1
157
8.1
61
7.2
138
8.7
62
|
Verified
8.4
149
Feature Not Available
7.8
136
8.4
58
|
Verified
8.8
158
8.4
60
|
Verified
8.6
158
8.6
57
|
Verified
8.9
166
8.8
59
|
Verified
8.5
145
Functionality
8.2
60
8.9
167
8.6
58
8.6
163
Implementation
7.9
60
8.9
180
7.8
60
8.2
143
8.3
59
8.1
131
Access Control
Not enough data
9.0
170
Not enough data
8.7
164
Not enough data
8.8
155
Not enough data
8.6
151
Administration
Not enough data
8.6
156
Not enough data
8.7
168
Not enough data
8.7
154
Not enough data
8.7
161
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
168
Not enough data
9.1
172
Not enough data
9.0
160
Administration
8.8
19
Not enough data
8.0
19
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
6.0
8
Not enough data
Administration
8.8
19
Not enough data
8.0
19
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
6.0
8
Not enough data
Authentication
9.2
13
Not enough data
9.3
12
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
10.0
5
Not enough data
User Experience
6.9
12
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
5.7
5
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
88
Not enough data
8.8
82
Not enough data
9.0
85
Not enough data
8.6
83
Not enough data
9.3
87
Not enough data
9.1
86
Functionality
Not enough data
9.5
86
Not enough data
9.4
86
Not enough data
9.1
75
Not enough data
8.9
81
Not enough data
9.3
86
Not enough data
9.3
87
Not enough data
8.9
84
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
80
Not enough data
9.2
80
Monitoring
Not enough data
9.2
86
Not enough data
9.2
86
Not enough data
9.0
82
Reporting
Not enough data
9.1
84
Not enough data
9.1
82
Functionality
8.6
33
Not enough data
8.6
33
Not enough data
8.7
33
Not enough data
8.5
32
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
8.8
32
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
8.3
33
Not enough data
Functionality
8.2
29
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
29
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
29
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
29
Not enough data
8.3
29
Not enough data
7.8
29
|
Verified
Not enough data
AI Authentication Risk Management - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Biometric & Behavioral Analysis - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Context-Aware Security Controls - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
7.7
28
8.6
85
Feature Not Available
8.8
91
8.7
31
9.1
111
Feature Not Available
7.6
100
Functionality
8.4
63
9.0
223
8.7
63
8.7
191
8.9
61
9.2
220
8.7
62
8.8
214
8.8
60
9.2
221
9.1
60
9.2
220
Type
8.3
61
8.5
196
8.5
60
9.2
216
Reporting
8.4
62
8.8
201
8.5
63
8.8
210
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Authentication & Authorization - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
Not enough data
9.7
5
Administration & Governance - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Generative AI - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Verify CIAM and Microsoft Entra ID are categorized as Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), User Provisioning and Governance Tools, Single Sign-On (SSO), Identity and Access Management (IAM), and Passwordless Authentication
Unique Categories
IBM Verify CIAM is categorized as Consent Management Platform (CMP), Self-Service Password Reset (SSPR) Tools, Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM), and Risk-Based Authentication (RBA)
Microsoft Entra ID is categorized as Cloud Directory Services and Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Verify CIAM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Microsoft Entra ID
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.9%
Computer Software
18.2%
Financial Services
6.1%
Telecommunications
3.4%
Marketing and Advertising
3.4%
Other
50.0%
Information Technology and Services
26.4%
Computer Software
9.5%
Computer & Network Security
6.7%
Financial Services
4.7%
Hospital & Health Care
2.8%
Other
49.9%
Discussions
IBM Verify CIAM has no discussions with answers
Which is better Google Authenticator or Microsoft authenticator?
3 Comments
SP
MS authenticator Read more
How good is Microsoft authenticator app?
4 Comments
AW
Easy to add accounts and hassle free for every authentication promptRead more
Is Azure Active Directory SaaS or PaaS?
2 Comments
SG
Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) is primarily a SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) offering provided by Microsoft as a cloud-based identity and access management...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
