Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM Turbonomic and Prometheus 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Komodor
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.9% of reviews)
Mid-Market (41.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
No pricing available
IBM Turbonomic
Star Rating
(282)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansPrometheus
Star Rating
(59)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (41.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PrometheusSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that IBM Turbonomic excels in Cloud Optimization with a score of 8.8, highlighting its ability to automatically adjust resources based on real-time demand, while Prometheus, with a score of 8.4, is noted for its strong monitoring capabilities but lacks the same level of automated optimization.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Turbonomic's Quality of Support is rated at 8.9, with many users praising the responsiveness and expertise of the support team, whereas Prometheus, rated at 7.8, has received feedback indicating that support can be slower and less comprehensive.
- G2 users highlight that IBM Turbonomic's Real-Time Monitoring for cloud infrastructure is rated at 9.0, with users appreciating its intuitive dashboards and alerts, while Prometheus, although strong in Usage Monitoring at 8.9, is often described as requiring more manual setup for effective monitoring.
- Users on G2 report that IBM Turbonomic's Automation features, rated at 8.7, allow for seamless workflow automation, which is particularly beneficial for large enterprises, while Prometheus, with a score of 8.5, is seen as more manual and less integrated in its automation capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Turbonomic's Proactive Identification of issues is rated at 8.9, with users appreciating its predictive analytics that help prevent problems before they occur, whereas Prometheus, rated at 8.3, is noted for its reactive approach, which can lead to delays in issue resolution.
- Users say that IBM Turbonomic's Multi-Cloud Management capabilities, rated at 8.4, are superior, allowing for easy management across different cloud environments, while Prometheus, although strong in monitoring, does not provide the same level of integrated multi-cloud management features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Turbonomic
Free Trial
Free Trial
Get started with Turbonomic for a 30-day evaluation with unlimited optimization of your application resources and cloud costs for your AWS, Azure and GCP accounts.
- Public cloud optimization
Prometheus
No pricing availableFree Trial
IBM Turbonomic
Free Trial is available
Prometheus
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
207
8.8
51
Ease of Use
8.4
216
8.1
52
Ease of Setup
8.3
170
8.1
36
Ease of Admin
8.5
141
8.1
31
Quality of Support
8.9
182
7.8
39
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
140
8.7
21
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
199
8.5
48
Features by Category
Operations
8.8
110
Not enough data
8.7
104
Not enough data
8.4
84
Not enough data
8.5
101
Not enough data
Cost Optimization
8.6
103
Not enough data
8.6
101
Not enough data
8.5
94
Not enough data
Administration
8.1
98
Not enough data
8.3
107
Not enough data
8.5
84
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cloud Cost Management
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Database Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.7
35
Not enough data
8.4
32
Not enough data
8.1
30
Not enough data
8.8
32
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
Administration
8.5
34
Not enough data
8.5
30
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
Analysis
7.9
34
Not enough data
7.9
34
Not enough data
8.3
34
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cloud Infrastructure Monitoring
7.3
8
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
AI Automation - Cloud Infrastructure Monitoring
6.7
8
Not enough data
6.5
8
Not enough data
Functionality
8.1
24
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
Management
8.7
23
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cloud Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
17
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
Issue Resolution
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
Management
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AIOps Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
Management
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Management
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
Monitoring
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.8
12
Maintenance
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.5
11
Security
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
7.3
10
Alerts management
7.7
8
7.6
14
7.3
8
8.0
15
8.0
9
8.8
15
Monitoring
8.1
9
8.3
15
8.1
9
9.3
16
8.7
9
8.6
14
Feature Not Available
8.1
15
Automation
7.1
8
8.6
14
7.3
8
8.6
15
Analysis
7.3
8
8.0
14
8.0
9
8.1
16
8.0
9
7.7
16
7.2
9
8.5
16
Issue Resolution
8.1
9
8.2
14
8.1
8
7.8
13
7.1
8
7.6
13
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - IT Alerting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Platform
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Security
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
25
Not enough data
8.1
25
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise IT Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Turbonomic and Prometheus are categorized as Container Monitoring
Unique Categories
Prometheus is categorized as Database Management Systems (DBMS) and Time Series Databases
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Turbonomic
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Prometheus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.0%
Computer Software
12.9%
Financial Services
5.9%
Telecommunications
5.5%
Computer & Network Security
4.7%
Other
52.9%
Computer Software
31.0%
Information Technology and Services
25.9%
Internet
6.9%
Telecommunications
5.2%
Logistics and Supply Chain
3.4%
Other
27.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
How does Turbonomic automate decision making?
1 Comment
Official Response from IBM Turbonomic
Turbonomic automates decision making by applying the economic principles of supply, demand, and price to managing IT resources. Workloads make scaling,...Read more
Why is this approach (of applying the economic principles of supply and demand to allocate IT resources) effective?
1 Comment
Official Response from IBM Turbonomic
This approach is effective because it allows workloads to make their own scaling, placement, and capacity decisions based on all the resources they need, it...Read more
Who does Turbonomic work with?
1 Comment
Official Response from IBM Turbonomic
We've partnered with 2,000+ enterprise customers and over 100 of the Fortune 500 to enable innovation. Our customers span across industries from technology,...Read more
What does Prometheus do?
1 Comment
HJ
Promothesus is metrics dashboard for your microservices which is based on monitoring your applicationRead more
Prometheus has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
