Link copied to clipboard

# IBM QRadar SOAR vs TheHive Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/ibm-qradar-soar/thehive/export.csv)

IBM QRadar SOARTheHive[+ Add Product](#)

Pricing

**IBM QRadar SOAR**
No pricing available

**TheHive**

**Contact for pricing** Per Year · TheHive Gold (on-prem)

**Contact for pricing** Per Year · TheHive Platinum (on-prem)

**Contact for pricing** Per Year · TheHive Cloud Platform Tailored (SaaS)

**Contact for pricing** Per Year · TheHive ONE

**Free** · TheHive Community Edition (on-prem)

Show more

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Perceived Cost

**IBM QRadar SOAR**
$$$$$

**TheHive**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**IBM QRadar SOAR**
Not enough reviews yet

**TheHive**
Not enough reviews yet

Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience.
See it for free

Time to Implement

**IBM QRadar SOAR** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**TheHive** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

Return on Investment

**IBM QRadar SOAR** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**TheHive** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**Pros & Cons**
from reviews

**IBM QRadar SOAR**

Ease of Use (5)

Automation (3)

Integration Issues (3)

Complexity (2)

**TheHive**

Customization (1)

Ease of Use (1)

Complex Setup (1)

Lack of Guidance (1)

Integrations

**IBM QRadar SOAR**
Not enough data

**TheHive**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_d8d487b67574b56a5ad57a2f0f159a30/airtable.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

Airtable

](https://www.g2.com/products/airtable/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_b3390b4cc3d92e87d570895f7358c003/aws-lambda.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

AWS Lambda

](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-lambda/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_a52b5ca1be5f5c08bf3caa6bd1766311/thomson-reuters-checkpoint.png "Product Avatar Image")

Checkpoint

](https://www.g2.com/products/thomson-reuters-checkpoint/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_ce6083360b9d32949ccac4c8fd8f0b27/checkpoint.png "Product Avatar Image")

CheckPoint

](https://www.g2.com/products/checkpoint/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/thehive/integrations)

Screenshots

**IBM QRadar SOAR**
 ![IBM QRadar SOAR screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/115316/SOAR-AppExchangeListings.png)

**TheHive**
 ![TheHive screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1977551/Centralize.png)

**Ratings**
from reviews

Meets Requirements

**IBM QRadar SOAR**

**7.8** /10

Based on 23 responses

**TheHive**

**9.0** /10

Based on 15 responses

Ease of Use

**IBM QRadar SOAR**

**7.5** /10

Based on 23 responses

**TheHive**

**8.8** /10

Based on 15 responses

Ease of Setup

**IBM QRadar SOAR**

**7.9** /10

Based on 14 responses

**TheHive**

**8.3** /10

Based on 12 responses

Ease of Admin

**IBM QRadar SOAR**

**6.7** /10

Based on 11 responses

**TheHive**

**8.8** /10

Based on 12 responses

Quality of Support

**IBM QRadar SOAR**

**7.9** /10

Based on 23 responses

**TheHive**

**7.9** /10

Based on 15 responses

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**IBM QRadar SOAR**

**7.7** /10

Based on 11 responses

**TheHive**

**8.5** /10

Based on 11 responses

Product Direction (% positive)

**IBM QRadar SOAR**

**8.0** /10

Based on 23 responses

**TheHive**

**8.4** /10

Based on 15 responses

**Features**
ratings from reviews

Incident Response

**7.6** /10

Based on 17 responses

**8.2** /10

Based on 12 responses

Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)

**7.4** /10

Based on 10 responses

Not enough data

User Insights

**Reviewers' Company Size**

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
8.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
24.0%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
68.0%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
8.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
24.0%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
68.0%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
11.8%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
35.3%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
52.9%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
11.8%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
35.3%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
52.9%

**Reviewers' Industry**

[![IBM QRadar SOAR](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/7d76baae79036d41d25c4a6c46e5af43/ibm-qradar-soar.svg "IBM QRadar SOAR")](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-qradar-soar/reviews)
IBM QRadar SOAR

Information Technology and Services
32.0%

Utilities
8.0%

Retail
8.0%

Computer Networking
8.0%

Computer & Network Security
8.0%

Other
36.0%

[![TheHive](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/82465bc654f7111c0512b0cf1aa87ae8/thehive.svg "TheHive")](https://www.g2.com/products/thehive/reviews)
TheHive

Financial Services
17.6%

Telecommunications
11.8%

Information Technology and Services
11.8%

Computer & Network Security
11.8%

Security and Investigations
5.9%

Other
41.2%

Alternatives

**IBM QRadar SOAR Alternatives**

 ![Microsoft Sentinel](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a8a99a96fda235658139f710592f8a53/microsoft-sentinel.svg "Microsoft Sentinel")

[
Microsoft Sentinel
](/products/microsoft-sentinel/reviews)

 ![Google Security Operations](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_aeae116c52945fdecd7ed16d621cb315/google-security-operations.png "Google Security Operations")

[
Google Security Operations
](/products/google-security-operations/reviews)

 ![Tines Stories](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/308aa01878587e0f4031de9fd36cb216/tines-stories.svg "Tines Stories")

[
Tines Stories
](/products/tines-stories/reviews)

 ![D3 Security](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/df4c95c14f730a9758b3c0b220f2a993/d3-security.svg "D3 Security")

[
D3 Security
](/products/d3-security/reviews)

**TheHive Alternatives**

 ![Wazuh](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8d31602793a3055a5482a48147140ea9/wazuh.png "Wazuh")

[
Wazuh
](/products/wazuh/reviews)

 ![LevelBlue USM Anywhere](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/dafcd5faaef898c5bee18cd5d63cef91/levelblue-usm-anywhere%282%29.svg "LevelBlue USM Anywhere")

[
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
](/products/levelblue-usm-anywhere/reviews)

 ![IBM QRadar SIEM](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/7d76baae79036d41d25c4a6c46e5af43/ibm-ibm-qradar-siem.svg "IBM QRadar SIEM")

[
IBM QRadar SIEM
](/products/ibm-ibm-qradar-siem/reviews)

 ![Splunk Enterprise Security](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/b92838221b8df42dd6b5bb09c9f8ff55/splunk-enterprise-security.svg "Splunk Enterprise Security")

[
Splunk
](/products/splunk-enterprise-security/reviews)

## IBM QRadar SOAR vs TheHive FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 14, 2026

### What is the difference between TheHive vs IBM QRadar SOAR?

TheHive stands out for higher reviewer satisfaction and ease of administration, while IBM QRadar SOAR is noted for its automation and integration capabilities.

| [TheHive](https://www.g2.com/products/thehive/reviews) | [IBM QRadar SOAR](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-qradar-soar/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.3/5 (18 reviews) | 4.0/5 (29 reviews) |
| — | Enterprise |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Easy to set up, maintain, and use | Automation and integration with security tools |

### How do the pricing models of TheHive and IBM QRadar SOAR compare?

TheHive is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its pricing compared to IBM QRadar SOAR.

- **TheHive:** In recent reviews, buyers highlight TheHive's open-source roots and cost-effectiveness, though note that newer versions require payment.
- **IBM QRadar SOAR:** Reviewers mention that IBM QRadar SOAR is not open source and can be expensive, with some noting the need for licenses and migration costs.

### What are the best alternatives to TheHive and IBM QRadar SOAR?

The top 3 alternatives to TheHive and IBM QRadar SOAR are Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, and Tines.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [TheHive](https://www.g2.com/products/thehive/reviews) | 4.3/5 (18 reviews) | — | Open-source roots, paid for latest version | Easy to set up, maintain, and use |
| [IBM QRadar SOAR](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-qradar-soar/reviews) | 4.0/5 (29 reviews) | Enterprise | Requires licenses, not open source | Automation and integration with security tools |
| [Microsoft Sentinel](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-sentinel/reviews) | 4.4/5 (298 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |
| [Wazuh](https://www.g2.com/products/wazuh/reviews) | 4.5/5 (71 reviews) | Small-Business | — | — |
| [Tines](https://www.g2.com/products/tines/reviews) | 4.7/5 (408 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | — |

### Which Incident Response features should I prioritize when comparing TheHive and IBM QRadar SOAR?

Buyers should prioritize ease of setup, integrations, automation, threat intelligence, and case management when comparing TheHive and IBM QRadar SOAR.

- **Ease of Setup:** TheHive scores 8.3, IBM QRadar SOAR scores 7.9.
- **Integrations:** IBM QRadar SOAR is frequently cited for integrations (3 all-time mentions), while TheHive is praised for integration with Cortex and MISP in recent reviews.
- **Automation:** IBM QRadar SOAR has 3 all-time mentions for automation; TheHive is noted for automating incident response processes in recent reviews.
- **Threat Intelligence:** TheHive is highlighted for integration with Cortex and MISP; IBM QRadar SOAR is used for automated enrichment and threat detection.
- **Case Management:** TheHive is praised for case creation, merging, and tracking in recent reviews.

### What are the pros and cons of TheHive vs IBM QRadar SOAR?

TheHive's headline strength is ease of setup and use, while IBM QRadar SOAR is recognized for automation and integration capabilities.

- **TheHive strengths:** Easy to set up, maintain, and use; praised for integration with Cortex and MISP; open-source roots; strong case management and automation features.
- **TheHive trade-offs:** Newer versions require payment; some modules may not work properly; installation can be complex for beginners.
- **IBM QRadar SOAR strengths:** Automation (3 all-time mentions); integrations (3 all-time mentions); ease of use (5 all-time mentions); flexible customization; strong support from IBM; effective for consolidating security incidents and automating workflows.
- **IBM QRadar SOAR trade-offs:** Integration issues (3 all-time mentions); complexity (2 all-time mentions); limited integration (2 all-time mentions); some reviewers cite bugs and system limitations; not open source and can be expensive.

### Is TheHive or IBM QRadar SOAR better for small businesses?

Wazuh is the top-ranked alternative with a Small-Business segment, but between TheHive and IBM QRadar SOAR, TheHive is better suited for small businesses based on reviewer sentiment.

- **TheHive:** Reviewers highlight its flexibility for both small and large environments, ease of use, and open-source origins, making it accessible for small teams.
- **IBM QRadar SOAR:** Largest segment is Enterprise, and reviewers note its complexity and higher cost, which may be less suitable for small businesses.

### Which Incident Response platform has better integrations?

IBM QRadar SOAR is favored for integrations, with more frequent reviewer mentions and a broader integration ecosystem.

- **TheHive:** In recent reviews, TheHive is praised for integration with Cortex and MISP, supporting threat intelligence and SIEM workflows.
- **IBM QRadar SOAR:** Integrations are cited in 3 all-time mentions, with reviewers highlighting connections to QRadar, Jira, Lacework, and Gsuite.

### How do TheHive and IBM QRadar SOAR compare on customer support?

TheHive and IBM QRadar SOAR are rated equally on Quality of Support, both scoring 7.9, indicating parity in reviewer satisfaction.

- **TheHive:** Reviewers describe an active community and responsive support, with issues typically resolved after feedback.
- **IBM QRadar SOAR:** Reviewers note strong support from IBM, with rapid ticket resolution and helpful support analysts, though some mention the need for better technical documentation.

### Which is easier to implement, TheHive or IBM QRadar SOAR?

TheHive and IBM QRadar SOAR are rated within 0.4 points on Ease of Setup (8.3 vs 7.9), indicating near parity in implementation experience.

- **TheHive:** Reviewers consistently describe TheHive as easy to set up and maintain, with a straightforward configuration process for those familiar with Linux.
- **IBM QRadar SOAR:** Reviewers mention that setup is generally easy with IBM guides, but note that the product can be complex and time-consuming to configure for advanced use cases.

### Which product has better Threat Intelligence?

TheHive is favored for Threat Intelligence due to its strong integration with Cortex and MISP, while IBM QRadar SOAR is used for automated enrichment and threat detection.

- **TheHive:** Reviewers highlight integration with Cortex and MISP for threat intelligence; Meets Requirements score is 9.0.
- **IBM QRadar SOAR:** Reviewers cite automated enrichment and threat detection; Meets Requirements score is 7.8.

## IBM QRadar SOAR vs TheHive

When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found TheHive easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with TheHive overall.

- Reviewers felt that TheHive meets the needs of their business better than IBM QRadar SOAR.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, IBM QRadar SOAR and TheHive provide similar levels of assistance.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of TheHive over IBM QRadar SOAR.