IBM QRadar SOAR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Tenable Vulnerability Management easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Tenable Vulnerability Management overall.
Reviewers felt that Tenable Vulnerability Management meets the needs of their business better than IBM QRadar SOAR.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Tenable Vulnerability Management is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Tenable Vulnerability Management over IBM QRadar SOAR.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM QRadar SOAR
No pricing available
Tenable Vulnerability Management
No pricing available
Free Trial
IBM QRadar SOAR
No trial information available
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.8
23
8.9
83
Ease of Use
7.5
23
8.9
85
Ease of Setup
7.9
14
8.7
69
Ease of Admin
6.7
11
8.7
66
Quality of Support
7.9
23
8.1
80
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
What is your primary use case for Tenable Vulnerability Management, and how has it impacted your security posture?
1 Comment
JG
Hello, good morning!
Well, our first impression was of the completely vulnerable and exposed environment. This was a view we didn't have before Tenable VM....Read more
Tenable.io is user-friendly front end for Nessus scanners that provides a digestible view of all of the data the scanner is picking up. It allows you to...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.