Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare MongoDB and Neo4j Graph Database 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
MongoDB
Star Rating
(17)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MongoDBNeo4j Graph Database
Star Rating
(133)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about Neo4j Graph DatabaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Neo4j Graph Database excels in data modeling with a score of 8.6, allowing for complex relationships to be easily represented, while MongoDB's data model score of 7.7 indicates it may not handle intricate relationships as effectively.
- Reviewers mention that MongoDB offers superior ease of use with a score of 9.1 compared to Neo4j's 8.2, making it more accessible for users who are new to database management.
- G2 users highlight that Neo4j's query language, Cypher, is particularly powerful for graph queries, scoring 8.7, while MongoDB's query language received a lower score of 8.2, suggesting it may not be as intuitive for complex queries.
- Users on G2 report that MongoDB shines in its ease of setup, scoring 9.3, which is higher than Neo4j's 8.8, indicating that MongoDB may be quicker to deploy for small businesses.
- Reviewers mention that Neo4j's data replication capabilities score 9.0, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity in graph databases, while MongoDB's replication features are not highlighted as strongly, suggesting potential limitations in this area.
- Users say that both products have strong support ratings, but MongoDB edges out with a score of 8.9 compared to Neo4j's 8.5, indicating a slightly better user experience when seeking assistance.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
MongoDB
No pricing availableNeo4j Graph Database
AuraDB Free
Free
A fully-managed graph database for free; no commitment required.
- console.neo4j.io
Free Trial
MongoDB
No trial information availableNeo4j Graph Database
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
16
8.5
73
Ease of Use
9.1
16
8.2
75
Ease of Setup
9.2
8
8.7
31
Ease of Admin
9.2
6
8.0
28
Quality of Support
8.9
15
8.5
64
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
6
8.8
24
Product Direction (% positive)
9.3
16
9.0
68
Features by Category
Management
8.9
14
Not enough data
8.8
14
Not enough data
8.7
14
Not enough data
8.6
14
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
Maintenance
8.2
13
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
Security
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
21
Availability
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.9
13
Performance
Not enough data
7.4
19
Security
Not enough data
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
7.1
14
Support
Not enough data
7.2
15
Not enough data
6.2
15
Not enough data
7.7
17
Configuration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
MongoDB and Neo4j Graph Database are categorized as Database Management Systems (DBMS)
Unique Categories
MongoDB has no unique categories
Neo4j Graph Database is categorized as Graph Databases and Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
MongoDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Neo4j Graph Database
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
35.3%
Computer Software
35.3%
Telecommunications
5.9%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
5.9%
Financial Services
5.9%
Other
11.8%
Computer Software
25.2%
Information Technology and Services
16.8%
Internet
5.3%
Telecommunications
4.6%
Marketing and Advertising
3.1%
Other
45.0%
Discussions
What is Compose Hosted MongoDB used for?
1 Comment
MG
It is used for distributed database managementRead more
MongoDB has no more discussions with answers
What is neo4j good for?
2 Comments
MR
For the simple friends of friends query, Neo4j is 60% faster than MySQL. For friends of friends of friends, Neo is 180 times faster. And for the depth four...Read more
Is neo4j enterprise free?
2 Comments
JJ
If you are a student aiming to be acquire new-age data science skills; enroll for an academic course and you can use it for free for certification purposes. Read more
What companies use neo4j?
1 Comment
Official Response from Neo4j Graph Database
Great question. This page https://neo4j.com/customers/ has a shortlist of referenceable customers. Comcast, eBay, Adobe, and Microsoft, to name a few. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
