Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Hyland Perceptive Content and IBM FileNet Content Manager 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
isoTracker
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
BlueDocs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (71.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Hyland Perceptive Content
Star Rating
(42)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Hyland Perceptive ContentIBM FileNet Content Manager
Star Rating
(139)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (71.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM FileNet Content ManagerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Perceptive Content excels in ease of use, with a score of 8.3, making it more user-friendly compared to IBM FileNet Content Manager, which has a lower score of 7.4. Reviewers mention that the intuitive interface of Perceptive Content significantly reduces the learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Perceptive Content has a smoother setup process, scoring 7.1, while IBM FileNet Content Manager's setup is more complex, reflected in its score of 5.9. Users on G2 highlight that Perceptive Content's straightforward installation process allows for quicker deployment.
- G2 users indicate that Perceptive Content has a strong quality of support, with a score of 7.6, which is slightly lower than IBM FileNet Content Manager's score of 7.7. However, users report that Perceptive Content's support team is more responsive and helpful in resolving issues quickly.
- Users say that Perceptive Content shines in its product direction, with a score of 7.6, as they appreciate the regular updates and enhancements. In contrast, IBM FileNet Content Manager, with a score of 7.7, is perceived as more stable but less innovative, according to some reviewers.
- Reviewers mention that Perceptive Content is particularly strong in document management features, with users praising its robust search capabilities and tagging system. In comparison, users on G2 report that IBM FileNet Content Manager offers more advanced analytics features, which some find beneficial for enterprise-level needs.
- Users report that while both products serve their respective markets well, Perceptive Content is favored by mid-market companies for its affordability and ease of use, whereas IBM FileNet Content Manager is preferred by larger enterprises for its comprehensive feature set and scalability.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Hyland Perceptive Content
No pricing availableIBM FileNet Content Manager
No pricing availableFree Trial
Hyland Perceptive Content
No trial information availableIBM FileNet Content Manager
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
25
8.3
92
Ease of Use
8.3
36
7.4
92
Ease of Setup
7.1
25
6.0
66
Ease of Admin
8.1
14
7.0
64
Quality of Support
7.5
21
7.8
89
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.0
15
7.8
66
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
25
7.7
86
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Hyland Perceptive Content and IBM FileNet Content Manager are categorized as Document Management
Unique Categories
Hyland Perceptive Content has no unique categories
IBM FileNet Content Manager has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Hyland Perceptive Content
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM FileNet Content Manager
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
39.0%
Hospital & Health Care
14.6%
Education Management
9.8%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
7.3%
Information Technology and Services
7.3%
Other
22.0%
Insurance
20.2%
Banking
15.6%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Government Administration
9.2%
Financial Services
7.3%
Other
34.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is perceptive content desktop client?
1 Comment
Official Response from Hyland Perceptive Content
The Perceptive Content desktop client is part of the Perceptive Content platform, a scalable content services platform that manages the entire content...Read more
What is OnBase system?
1 Comment
Official Response from Hyland OnBase
Hi, Thank you for the question. OnBase provides core capabilities for multi-channel capture, content management, process automation, case management,...Read more
What is ImageNow?
1 Comment
Official Response from Hyland Perceptive Content
Hi,
Thank you for your question. Perceptive Content was formerly known as ImageNow. If you would like more information regarding Perceptive Content,...Read more
Does IBM FileNet content Manager support Russian language?
1 Comment
JR
yes, it supports Russian languageRead more
IBM FileNet Content Manager has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
