IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found OpenText Application Quality Management easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with OpenText Application Quality Management overall.
Reviewers felt that OpenText Application Quality Management meets the needs of their business better than IBM Engineering Workflow Management.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that OpenText Application Quality Management is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of IBM Engineering Workflow Management over OpenText Application Quality Management.
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.