Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare IBM Engineering Workflow Management and OpenText Application Quality Management

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Star Rating
(50)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.2% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Browse all 8 pricing plans
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality Management
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which reviewers mention allows for efficient organization and retrieval of test cases, making it easier for teams to manage their testing efforts.
  • Reviewers mention that IBM Engineering Workflow Management shines in its Product Direction, with a positive rating of 8.1, indicating that users feel confident in the ongoing development and enhancements of the software, which is crucial for long-term investment.
  • G2 users highlight the superior Ease of Use of OpenText ALM Quality Center, rated at 7.8, with many reviewers saying that its intuitive interface significantly reduces the learning curve for new users compared to IBM Engineering Workflow Management, which has a lower rating of 6.8.
  • Users on G2 report that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Bug Reporting features, particularly the Tester Reports & Feedback, scored an impressive 9.1, allowing teams to quickly address issues, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management's corresponding feature received a lower score, indicating less satisfaction among users.
  • Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Reporting capabilities are highly rated at 8.9, providing comprehensive insights that help teams make informed decisions, whereas IBM Engineering Workflow Management, while still competent, does not match this level of detail in its reporting features.
  • Users say that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Test Variety, rated at 9.0, is a standout feature, allowing for diverse testing scenarios, which is particularly beneficial for teams working on complex projects, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management does not offer the same breadth of testing options.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Free Trial
0.00
USD
Browse all 8 pricing plans
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing available
Free Trial
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
No trial information available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.0
29
8.2
118
Ease of Use
6.9
30
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
6.4
15
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
7.1
15
7.2
59
Quality of Support
7.4
28
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.6
14
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.2
26
6.8
116
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.8
11
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
13
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
6
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Requirements ManagementHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
IBM Engineering Workflow Management and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as ALM Software
Unique Categories
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is categorized as Version Control Clients
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, Bug Tracking, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
7.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
16.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
76.2%
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
12.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
21.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
66.4%
Reviewers' Industry
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Defense & Space
16.7%
Insurance
14.3%
Computer Software
9.5%
Automotive
9.5%
Other
33.3%
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
IBM Engineering Workflow Management Alternatives
SourceTree
SourceTree
Add SourceTree
codebeamer
codebeamer
Add codebeamer
GitKraken Desktop
GitKraken Desktop
Add GitKraken Desktop
Git Tower
Git Tower
Add Git Tower
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management Alternatives
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM
Add Perforce ALM
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Add Tricentis qTest
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Add Zephyr Enterprise
Discussions
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
IBM Engineering Workflow Management Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
IBM Engineering Workflow Management has no discussions with answers
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
Petr K.
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers