Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM Engineering Workflow Management and codebeamer 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
DocSheets
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Visure Requirements
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ScopeMaster
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (50.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
No pricing available
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Star Rating
(50)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Browse all 8 pricing planscodebeamer
Star Rating
(141)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about codebeamerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that codebeamer excels in "Traceability" with a score of 8.7, allowing teams to easily track requirements throughout the development process, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management falls slightly behind with a score of 8.0 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that codebeamer's "Centralized Information" feature, rated at 8.8, provides a comprehensive view of project data, which enhances collaboration, whereas IBM Engineering Workflow Management's score of 7.1 in "Ease of Admin" suggests that users find it less intuitive to manage.
- G2 users highlight that codebeamer's "Automated Creation & Testing" feature, rated at 7.6, streamlines the testing process, making it easier for teams to implement continuous integration, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management's lower score in this area indicates it may not be as efficient in automating these tasks.
- Users on G2 appreciate codebeamer's strong "Quality of Support" with a score of 8.3, noting that the support team is responsive and helpful, contrasting with IBM Engineering Workflow Management's score of 7.3, where users have reported slower response times.
- Reviewers say that codebeamer's "Ease of Use" is rated at 8.0, making it more user-friendly for teams new to the software, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management's score of 6.8 suggests a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Users report that codebeamer has been a "good partner in doing business" with a score of 8.6, indicating strong customer satisfaction, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management's score of 7.6 reflects some concerns among users regarding its adaptability to changing business needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Free Trial
0.00
USD
- Free trial with no commitment and no credit card
codebeamer
No pricing availableFree Trial
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
No trial information availablecodebeamer
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.0
29
8.4
98
Ease of Use
6.9
30
8.0
99
Ease of Setup
6.4
15
7.7
72
Ease of Admin
7.1
15
7.9
67
Quality of Support
7.4
28
8.3
92
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.6
14
8.6
62
Product Direction (% positive)
8.2
26
8.5
91
Features by Category
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.2
46
Not enough data
8.8
45
Not enough data
8.7
46
Communication
Not enough data
7.8
43
Not enough data
8.5
41
Procedural
Not enough data
7.7
38
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Engineering Workflow Management and codebeamer are categorized as ALM Software
Unique Categories
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is categorized as Version Control Clients
codebeamer is categorized as Requirements Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
codebeamer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Defense & Space
16.7%
Insurance
14.3%
Computer Software
9.5%
Automotive
9.5%
Other
33.3%
Automotive
30.7%
Medical Devices
22.9%
Computer Software
5.7%
Aviation & Aerospace
4.3%
Industrial Automation
3.6%
Other
32.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
IBM Engineering Workflow Management has no discussions with answers
highlighting on same customer requirements
1 Comment
JD
Hello Dhilippan
Thanks for your request.
We have some similar feature requests from our customers. We are working on some AI capabilities and this is one...Read more
Reference business case for CSV/Medical device?
1 Comment
NS
Hi Ralf!
While we do not have a case study on this particular topic, we have many clients in the healthcare/pharmaceutical area and all of them have...Read more
codebeamer has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
