Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM Engineering Test Management and Tricentis qTest 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (45.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
No pricing available
IBM Engineering Test Management
Star Rating
(25)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Browse all 4 pricing plansTricentis qTest
Star Rating
(100)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tricentis qTestSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Tricentis qTest excels in its Test Feedback feature, with a score of 9.2, allowing teams to gather insights quickly and effectively, while IBM Engineering Test Management, although solid, scores lower at 7.5 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Tricentis qTest's Test Repository functionality is highly rated at 8.9, providing a well-organized space for test cases, whereas IBM Engineering Test Management, while functional, does not match this level of organization, scoring only 7.8.
- G2 users highlight that Tricentis qTest offers superior Test Variety with a score of 9.2, enabling teams to manage different types of tests seamlessly, while IBM Engineering Test Management's score of 8.0 indicates it may not support as diverse a range of testing scenarios.
- Users on G2 appreciate Tricentis qTest's ease of use, scoring 8.2, which is notably higher than IBM Engineering Test Management's score of 7.2, suggesting that qTest may be more user-friendly for teams new to test management software.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Engineering Test Management shines in its Ease of Setup, scoring 9.0, making it a preferred choice for organizations looking for a quick implementation, while Tricentis qTest scores lower at 7.9 in this aspect.
- Users say that Tricentis qTest's Quality of Support is rated at 8.2, which is better than IBM Engineering Test Management's 7.5, indicating that users may find more responsive and helpful support with qTest.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Engineering Test Management
Free Trial
0.00
USD
- Free trial with no commitment and no credit card
Tricentis qTest
No pricing availableFree Trial
IBM Engineering Test Management
No trial information availableTricentis qTest
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
9
8.4
72
Ease of Use
7.2
9
8.4
74
Ease of Setup
9.0
5
8.0
38
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
7.9
20
Quality of Support
7.5
8
8.4
70
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
5
8.2
21
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
9
9.1
80
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
27
Not enough data
8.0
29
Not enough data
8.5
28
Management
Not enough data
8.3
28
Not enough data
8.2
27
Not enough data
8.1
26
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
9.2
15
Automation
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.0
15
Not enough data
8.8
15
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.0
10
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management and Tricentis qTest are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and Test Management
Unique Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management has no unique categories
Tricentis qTest has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Engineering Test Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tricentis qTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Automotive
16.7%
Computer Software
11.1%
Warehousing
5.6%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.6%
Other
27.8%
Information Technology and Services
27.1%
Computer Software
22.9%
Financial Services
7.3%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.2%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
IBM Engineering Test Management has no discussions with answers
Does qTest integrate with JIRA?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
qTest integrates with JIRA Cloud and JIRA Server, while also providing qTest Cloud or Server deployment options.
See this video here:...Read more
On-Boarding, Training, and continued support is a must have for any tool we adopt. How does QASymphony fit into our success?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
Keeping our customers happy is a top priority, and it shows. We consistently get top satisfaction scores across the board.
Check out our customer info...Read more
What is frequency of updates/releases?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
At QASymphony, we are releasing new features and product improvements throughout the year. Right now we are targeting to release between 8 - 10 times a...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
