Compare IBM Engineering Test Management and Tricentis qTest 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (46.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
No pricing available
IBM Engineering Test Management
Star Rating
(25)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Browse all 4 pricing plansTricentis qTest
Star Rating
(101)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Tricentis qTestSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Tricentis qTest excels in user satisfaction, with a higher overall rating compared to IBM Engineering Test Management. Users appreciate its ability to centralize test management and provide seamless integration with tools like Jira, enhancing collaboration between QA and development teams.
- Users say that Tricentis qTest offers a more intuitive experience, particularly in managing test cases. Reviewers highlight the ease of creating and executing test cases, which significantly improves efficiency and quality during deployments.
- According to verified reviews, IBM Engineering Test Management shines in its comprehensive integration with other IBM tools, such as RQM and RTC. This integration helps teams maintain traceability and streamline their Agile planning processes, making it a solid choice for larger enterprises.
- Reviewers mention that while IBM Engineering Test Management has a robust feature set, it can be less user-friendly compared to Tricentis qTest. Users have noted challenges with the setup and administration, which can hinder quick adoption in fast-paced environments.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Tricentis qTest's ability to reuse test cases is a standout feature, allowing teams to save time and improve quality with each deployment. This feature is particularly beneficial for organizations that frequently update their applications.
- Users express that while IBM Engineering Test Management is effective for complex projects, it may not be as agile as Tricentis qTest in terms of usability. Reviewers appreciate the unique features of IBM's tool but often find it less straightforward for day-to-day testing activities.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Engineering Test Management
Free Trial
0.00
USD
- Free trial with no commitment and no credit card
Tricentis qTest
No pricing availableFree Trial
IBM Engineering Test Management
No trial information availableTricentis qTest
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
9
8.4
73
Ease of Use
7.2
9
8.4
75
Ease of Setup
9.0
5
8.0
39
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
7.9
21
Quality of Support
7.5
8
8.4
71
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
5
8.3
22
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
9
9.1
81
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
27
Not enough data
8.1
30
Not enough data
8.5
28
Management
Not enough data
8.3
28
Not enough data
8.2
27
Not enough data
8.1
26
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
9.2
15
Automation
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.0
15
Not enough data
8.8
15
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.0
10
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management and Tricentis qTest are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and Test Management
Unique Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management has no unique categories
Tricentis qTest has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Engineering Test Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tricentis qTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Automotive
16.7%
Computer Software
11.1%
Warehousing
5.6%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.6%
Other
27.8%
Information Technology and Services
26.8%
Computer Software
23.7%
Financial Services
7.2%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.2%
Hospital & Health Care
4.1%
Other
33.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
IBM Engineering Test Management has no discussions with answers
Does qTest integrate with JIRA?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
qTest integrates with JIRA Cloud and JIRA Server, while also providing qTest Cloud or Server deployment options.
See this video here:...Read more
On-Boarding, Training, and continued support is a must have for any tool we adopt. How does QASymphony fit into our success?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
Keeping our customers happy is a top priority, and it shows. We consistently get top satisfaction scores across the board.
Check out our customer info...Read more
What is frequency of updates/releases?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
At QASymphony, we are releasing new features and product improvements throughout the year. Right now we are targeting to release between 8 - 10 times a...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
