Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM Engineering Test Management and ReadyAPI 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (42.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
No pricing available
IBM Engineering Test Management
Star Rating
(25)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Browse all 4 pricing plansReadyAPI
Star Rating
(72)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (42.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ReadyAPISummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that IBM Engineering Test Management excels in its Test Repository functionality, allowing for efficient organization and management of test cases, which is crucial for large enterprises. In contrast, ReadyAPI is noted for its Test Diversity, enabling users to perform a wide range of testing types, including functional, performance, and security testing.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Engineering Test Management offers superior Ease of Admin, with a score of 9.3, making it easier for teams to manage their testing processes. However, users on G2 highlight that ReadyAPI has a more user-friendly interface, reflected in its higher Ease of Use score of 8.5, which can be beneficial for teams with less technical expertise.
- G2 users indicate that IBM Engineering Test Management provides robust Reporting capabilities, allowing teams to generate detailed reports on test results and coverage. Conversely, users report that ReadyAPI shines in its Automation features, making it easier to integrate automated tests into CI/CD pipelines.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Engineering Test Management has a strong focus on Version Control, which is essential for teams working on large projects with multiple contributors. In comparison, ReadyAPI is praised for its Collaboration tools, which facilitate better communication among team members during the testing process.
- Users say that IBM Engineering Test Management has a solid Quality of Support, with a score of 7.5, but ReadyAPI outperforms it with a score of 8.3, indicating that users find ReadyAPI's support more responsive and helpful when issues arise.
- Users on G2 report that IBM Engineering Test Management has a lower Product Direction score of 6.1, suggesting some concerns about its future development. In contrast, ReadyAPI's score of 8.9 indicates a more positive outlook on its ongoing enhancements and feature updates, which is a significant consideration for long-term investment.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Engineering Test Management
Free Trial
0.00
USD
- Free trial with no commitment and no credit card
ReadyAPI
No pricing availableFree Trial
IBM Engineering Test Management
No trial information availableReadyAPI
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
9
8.8
55
Ease of Use
7.2
9
8.5
54
Ease of Setup
9.0
5
9.0
15
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
8.5
14
Quality of Support
7.5
8
8.3
52
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
5
8.6
15
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
9
8.9
53
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management and ReadyAPI are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management is categorized as Test Management
ReadyAPI is categorized as Service Virtualization
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Engineering Test Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ReadyAPI
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Automotive
16.7%
Computer Software
11.1%
Warehousing
5.6%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.6%
Other
27.8%
Information Technology and Services
29.0%
Computer Software
23.2%
Financial Services
8.7%
Insurance
5.8%
Telecommunications
2.9%
Other
30.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
IBM Engineering Test Management has no discussions with answers
ReadyAPI has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
