Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM Engineering Test Management and PractiTest 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (42.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Starting at $49.00 Per Month
IBM Engineering Test Management
Star Rating
(25)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Browse all 4 pricing plansPractiTest
Star Rating
(231)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (42.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $49.00 Per Month
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that PractiTest excels in its "Test Repository" feature, scoring 8.9, which allows for efficient organization and retrieval of test cases, while IBM Engineering Test Management, although robust, does not highlight this feature as strongly.
- Reviewers mention that PractiTest's "Quality of Support" is rated at 9.1, indicating a high level of customer satisfaction, whereas IBM Engineering Test Management's support is rated lower at 7.5, suggesting potential challenges in user assistance.
- G2 users highlight PractiTest's "Ease of Use" with a score of 8.3, making it more accessible for teams, while IBM Engineering Test Management's score of 7.2 indicates a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Users on G2 report that PractiTest's "Customization" options are highly appreciated, allowing teams to tailor the software to their specific needs, whereas IBM Engineering Test Management lacks in this area, leading to a more rigid user experience.
- Reviewers say that PractiTest's "Stakeholder Communication" feature scores 8.6, facilitating better collaboration among team members, while IBM Engineering Test Management's communication capabilities are perceived as less effective, scoring lower in this aspect.
- Users report that PractiTest's "Automation" capabilities, particularly in "Automated Creation & Testing," are rated at 9.2, showcasing its strength in streamlining testing processes, while IBM Engineering Test Management does not emphasize automation features as effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Engineering Test Management
Free Trial
0.00
USD
- Free trial with no commitment and no credit card
PractiTest
Team (Popular)
Starting at $49.00
Per Month
All the features you need to centralize your testing operation
- Issues, Requirements, Tests, and Test Sets & Runs
- Unlimited Custom Fields and Filters
- Unlimited Projects
Free Trial
IBM Engineering Test Management
No trial information availablePractiTest
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
9
8.6
181
Ease of Use
7.2
9
8.3
182
Ease of Setup
9.0
5
8.3
87
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
8.5
81
Quality of Support
7.5
8
9.1
169
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
5
9.1
75
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
9
8.5
174
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
82
Not enough data
8.4
73
Not enough data
8.6
79
Management
Not enough data
8.5
80
Not enough data
8.4
73
Not enough data
8.4
75
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management and PractiTest are categorized as Software Testing and Test Management
Unique Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management is categorized as Automation Testing
PractiTest has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Engineering Test Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
PractiTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Automotive
16.7%
Computer Software
11.1%
Warehousing
5.6%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.6%
Other
27.8%
Information Technology and Services
25.4%
Computer Software
21.9%
Retail
5.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Marketing and Advertising
3.5%
Other
39.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
IBM Engineering Test Management has no discussions with answers
How do I plan to create filters so that I can reuse them again and again?
1 Comment
NS
Hi Aniruddha,
Thanks for reaching out. The best way to do that in your case is to create a 'Build' custom field of the type list and link it to the Test...Read more
PractiTest has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
